Jump to content





Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Spoiler-free review

Posted by Nathan Strum, 25 December 2017 · 255 views

Movies

I got out to see Star Wars: The Last Jedi a couple of nights ago. But before we get to the review… two things:
 
1) Remember my rant a few years ago about how awful movie theaters are? And later how I found movie theaters that corrected those problems? Well, to see any movie now, much less a Star Wars film, I'm really particular about where I see it. Since I'm in Seattle at the moment, I'd hoped to go to the Cinerama again, where I saw Star Wars: The Force Awakens. However, we found an alternative, and much to my surprise… it was at a theater chain. In this case: AMC/Loews. And while I think most AMC/Loews theaters are still little more than wallpapered outhouses, this one had something special going for it: one of their screening rooms had been turned into a Dolby Cinema.
 
So, what does that mean? Well, first, it's new. That means it hasn't been trashed yet. The screen is new, and clean. The seats are new. The floors aren't a sticky mess. But better than that - it's fully equipped with the latest Dolby projection and audio systems. So that means there's a better-than-average chance that the picture and sound may be somewhat correct (in this case, both were excellent). Plus, the seating is vastly improved. The old seats have been removed and the theater completely restructured with fully adjustable, electrically-controlled leather* recliners. Big and comfy, with tons of legroom. Plus, the rows are tiered in such a way that the theater is much steeper, and each row has a knee wall in front of it, giving uninterrupted sight-lines throughout the room.
 
*(probably not actual leather)
 
And better still - the seats are reserved. No waiting in line with the huddled masses in order to maybe find a decent seat. We ordered online a few days in advance, and were able to score some excellent seats for a midday showing.
 
The downside? Well, it's more expensive. A lot more. By the time you add in "convenience" fees**, it's almost $20 per ticket. For a movie. A popcorn and a drink added another $15. So… yeah. Crazy expensive. Plus, the bathrooms still stink like an open sewer.
 
**(does this mean they owe me a refund for all of the times it was inconvenient to see a movie there?)
 
But ultimately, for me, since I don't see that many movies, and presentation makes a huge difference in my enjoyment of a movie, it was worth the extra money. So if they have a Dolby Cinema in your area, you might check it out.
 
Especially if you have to sit through 24 minutes of trailers. 24! A quarter of my popcorn was already gone by the time the movie started.
 
But if they don't have a Dolby Cinema, avoid AMC/Loews like the plague. Seriously, their other theaters are toilets.
 
They aren't like toilets, I think they actually are toilets.
 
2) As I was getting ready to see The Last Jedi, I thought back to Return of the Jedi. What did the title mean? Who was the returning Jedi? Was it Anakin Skywalker returning as the Jedi he had once been? Was it Luke Skywalker returning, now as a Jedi? Was it plural - the Jedi as an order returning in the person of Luke Skywalker? Beats me. I'm still not sure. Just some food for thought.
 
There's no such ambiguity in Star Wars: The Last Jedi though - by the end of the film, what The Last Jedi means is pretty clearly explained.
 
So, on with the review! Cue the Spoiler-free Review theme music! (For the sake of variety, this time it's Sugar, Sugar by the Archies, for no particular reason.)
 
Actually, you ought to hear Micky Dolenz's version from his solo album Remember. Totally different take on it.
 
Oh right. The review.
 
So, first things first - I enjoyed The Last Jedi. I know there are some fans out there who outright hated it, but I'm not in that camp. Much of it was a lot of fun, which is what a Star Wars film should be. There wasn't anything that I really disliked about it, although there were some things I was disappointed in. But I thought it was better than The Force Awakens, although a lot of that is because The Last Jedi wasn't just a rehash of the original Star Wars.
 
Carrie Fisher has a more significant role in the movie, and her presence in Episode IX will be sorely missed. Mark Hamill actually gets to speak this time, and does several other things as well! He easily has the strongest performance in the movie, and this movie is as much about Luke Skywalker as any of the newer characters. In fact, pretty-much everyone has an expanded role in the film (save for Captain Phasma, who does a little more this time around, but really is becoming something of a punchline), but therein lies one of the problems of The Last Jedi: it's a long film. A bit too long.
 
While Rian Johnson does a good job of keeping the film and its different plots moving along, there's a bit too much of it. Most notably, the side quest with Finn and Rose is entirely unnecessary. It's kind of a throw-away B-story - something that would be more suited to an old Marvel Star Wars comic book, rather than taking up so much time here. The Last Jedi would have been a sleeker, more streamlined, and possibly more effective story without it. Parts of their story are fun, but a lot of it feels like "We better give Finn something to do - since he doesn't fit in anywhere else".
 
There's also a significant amount of fan service in The Last Jedi - scenes that were added in just to please the audience - with a number of overt homages to The Empire Strikes Back. While those can be fun, I tend to find them distracting since they remind you that you're watching a movie, rather than just letting you sit there and enjoy the new movie for what it is. Also, I felt some of the humor was a little too… familiar. Not in terms of it being recycled, but in terms of it feeling like contemporary, pop-culture humor. Star Wars humor (when it worked best) was always kept in the context of the Star Wars universe, and felt natural. Some of the humor in this film felt forced (pun not intended), or overused. The Porgs were completely unnecessary, but they didn't bother me all that much, since they didn't have as much screen time as I feared, given all of the marketing hype surrounding them. There were a couple of scenes with BB-8 though that were just too over-the-top, and seemed like they'd be more at home in a HISHE parody, than the actual film.
 
As for those disappointments I mentioned - there are a couple of significant plot points that weren't handled very well. I'll expand on those a little here, plus add another. Please use Spoiler tags if responding to these:

  • Spoiler
  • Spoiler
  • Spoiler
Again, I'm not in the "I hate The Last Jedi" camp. I fully get that some people hate it, but as far as I'm concerned, everything except The Empire Strikes Back has failed to some degree or other to live up to the original Star Wars. Return of the Jedi was a massive disappointment to me (30+ years later, I still refer to it as a big, Muppety, Ewok turd). The less said about the Prequel Trilogy, the better. And while The Force Awakens was overall a good movie, it was too derivative, and had too many of J.J. Arbrams' trademark technology McGuffins. Rogue One was a solid piece of Star Wars storytelling entertainment, although again, not without its problems.
 
That's basically where I'd put The Last Jedi. I didn't have any issues with how the characters were handled. I didn't have any preconceived ideas about how Luke Skywalker should or should not have acted. I went to the movie to find out what had happened to him - not watch online fanboy theories play out. I never read any of the non-movie books (save for Splinter of the Mind's Eye, and a couple of the early Han Solo books). None of the Expanded Universe matters to me, so I had no alternate histories for this film to live up to. I'm sure they're good stories - but I don't expect them to be canon any more than the Marvel Star Wars comics that I collected as a kid. I just enjoyed them for what they were.
 
I generally liked the performances in the Last Jedi, the notable exception being Snoke, who looked even more fake here than in The Force Awakens. Mark Hamill brought great emotion to Luke, and a depth we'd never seen before. Carrie Fisher seemed far more at home in The Last Jedi, and really shone brightly as the heart and soul of the Resistance, and her final scenes are a poignant reminder of what will be missed about her. Daisy Ridley was solid again as Rey, and Adam Driver still makes for an interesting, conflicted Kylo Ren
Spoiler
As mentioned before, I felt that the Finn and Rose side story was largely throwaway, but they did a serviceable job with the material they were given. The other characters in the film are fine - again, mostly serviceable. Nothing bad, but nothing they're going to be handing Oscars out for, either. But they should really stop trying to make the Poe Dameron thing happen. I just don't get the appeal. Not really a strong, lead character in my opinion, and someone they wasted entirely too much screen time on.
 
The action sequences in the film were solid - although there were a few scenes lifted a little too directly out of The Empire Strikes Back. Stop with the homages already, and come up with something new, please. The special effects were all up to the best of modern standards, except, as already mentioned, Snoke. He never looked convincing, he walked badly (like bad CG animation, not like he was limping or something), and I didn't think much of Andy Serkis' acting, either. He seemed very flat, and never truly menacing. Also, Chewbacca looked a little odd at times. I know Peter Mayhew is no longer in the mask, but I'm wondering if they were attempting some CG trickery or had changed something significant about his face, because his mouth didn't look quite right.
 
Where The Last Jedi actually worked best for me were the scenes with Luke coming to terms with his own past. Again - I went to this film to find out what had happened to him. Mark Hamill might not have agreed with the direction of Luke's character for this film, but that didn't stop him from doing a powerful acting job with it. We already know the Jedi were flawed and often made mistakes out of hubris - especially in the prequels. Even Obi-Wan turned out to be somewhat of a jerk with his "certain point-of-view". So Luke having some conflict in his own past shouldn't be that surprising - Jedi or not, he's still human. I think that makes him even more compelling. I enjoyed seeing Mark Hamill back as Luke Skywalker, and really delivering a performance worthy of the character. I spent decades assuming we'd never get to see Hamill back again as Luke. So I'm glad we finally got that. And if it wasn't what people were expecting - well, maybe sometimes that's a good thing. I get pretty tired of going to see movies where I can predict everything that's going to happen.
 
Some people may be unhappy with Star Wars being in the hands of Disney now - but remember what happened when it was in Lucas' hands? Remember Jar-Jar? Li'l Anakin? Teen angst Anakin? That absolutely awful dialog between him and Padme? And remember that Star Wars was effectively dead as a movie franchise when George had finished Episode III? Star Wars will never be everything everyone wants it to be, anymore than Star Trek will ever be everything everyone wants it to be. It can't measure up to peoples' nostalgia, memories or expectations. Overall, The Last Jedi was fun movie. For me. That's all I needed out of it. Anything beyond that is a bonus. And it was way, way better than the prequels... and a certain Muppety, Ewok Turd. No movie is perfect, and I doubt any Star Wars movie will ever live up to fan expectations. The Last Jedi didn't meet all of mine either, but neither was it predictable. Nor was it bad. Long? Yes. Incomplete? Sure. But I'm satisfied that seeing it was time well spent. I had fun. I really enjoyed watching Luke's story play out. I'd recommend it. It's a good popcorn flick. And a little bit more.
 
What I'm not looking forward to, is that J.J. Abrams will be back for Episode IX. Ugh. He'll probably introduce trans-galactic-hyper-underwear for traveling millions of lightyears without needing a spaceship. Or he'll bring in a race of time traveling, Force-weilding space Leprechauns. The last thing Star Wars needs is time travel. Can you imagine the mess that would cause?
 
Star Wars: The Last Jedi probably should get about a 7.5/10, but in order to score it higher than The Force Awakens or Rogue One, I'll have to give it an 8.2/10.
 
Yeah… that's probably being inconsistent with peoples' expectations. I'm sure someone will just absolutely hate this review because of that. ;)
 
(After writing this, I read this review at Slashfilm. I think it actually addresses some of my own complaints very well, and has a good perspective on the film.)






I really like Star Wars:The Last Jedi.  I've seen it twice at our AMC Dolby Cinema theatre. The second time we watched the first showing (9 a.m.) and to my surprise, it only cost $8.99. I wasn't expecting the Dolby theater to honor matinee pricing, but they do. :)

 

My top 3 Star Wars films are now, Empire Strikes Back, Rogue One and The Last Jedi.

  • Report

I really did not like this movie on several levels.  I'll have to watch it again after some time has passed.  

  • Report

My work took us for our Xmas party.  I was bored most of the film.

  • Report

I disagree that the Finn/Rose side story was unnecessary.  I do think the llama race through the forest was too much.  I think you could trim the whole trip down by about half and still get what you need from it.  I feel that storyline was there to help strike at the core of why we have to fight the First Order/Empire and really get what the Resistance is about.  One of the contemporary gripes about the OT is that we never see why the Empire is so bad, we are just told it's bad.  I think this scene helps remedy that a little bit.  It also sets up one of the most poignant moments at the end of the film.  I'm ok with both of those things.

 

I think a lot of people are upset that their plan didn't work.  But I'm ok with that too because sometimes plans don't work and thus far Star Wars has lived on the back of harebrained schemes by rogue agents that need everything to happen perfectly to save the galaxy, and do.  If it happened again here, what's new?  What's interesting?  But what happens if the crazy plan fails and everything goes totally tits-up?  Finally we get to see that and our characters get to deal with it.  It also is a character moment for Poe Dameron.  It's his idea to send them on this plan.  Many times in this film Poe is so sure he is right and I think it's important that sometimes he's not.  People are wringing their hands because Rey "has no faults" (which isn't true), so here we have a moment where Poe puts everything at risk on the back of an unlikely plan that blows up (literally) in his face (not literally), and now he has to look his mentor in the face and accept a whole humble pie.  That, my friends, is how you build a character.  We don't love Han Solo because he's always right, we love him because he's usually wrong and Leia has to save his hash.  It's how he recovers from that, that makes us love him.  "you do have your moments, not many of them, but you do have them."

 

So I don't think we can throw away the Monte Carlo trip entirely.  While it doesn't pan out as a plan it pays off in bigger ways for the film and its characters.

  • Report

I feel that storyline was there to help strike at the core of why we have to fight the First Order/Empire and really get what the Resistance is about.


Because arms dealers are getting rich off of the First Order, and they abuse space llama stable boys? That’s all I got out of that whole trip. Plus, we found out the Resistance is making arms dealers wealthy, too. That, to me, was the biggest revelation for Finn on that whole trip.

One of the contemporary gripes about the OT is that we never see why the Empire is so bad, we are just told it's bad.


Well, they blew up Alderaan.

so here we have a moment where Poe puts everything at risk on the back of an unlikely plan that blows up (literally) in his face (not literally), and now he has to look his mentor in the face and accept a whole humble pie.  That, my friends, is how you build a character.  We don't love Han Solo because he's always right, we love him because he's usually wrong and Leia has to save his hash.


Yes, but Han was an interesting character from the outset. Poe still isn’t. Maybe I’m missing something, but he completely lacks any sort of charisma.
 

So I don't think we can throw away the Monte Carlo trip entirely.  While it doesn't pan out as a plan it pays off in bigger ways for the film and its characters.


While I agree it may have helped develop Rose and Finn’s characters, I still feel the entire subplot felt tacked on. Their entire mission was nothing more than an elaborate countdown clock. They could have figured out some way for them to get directly onto the Dreadnaught, and accomplished the same plot points in far less time.
  • Report

I think the larger themes of avarice and oppression are expressed in the reductions you list.  I think those are important because, as you point out the Empire did blow up Alderaan, but the Rebels were already fighting them at that point and we don't know much of why.  It just fleshes out the conflict a little more and makes it less one-dimensional.  I guess you don't need it, but I don't think it's out of place. 

 

We are definitely seeing different Poes.  I think he's a great character.  He's the up close action rebel pilot we all imagined Wedge Antilles to be, so he scratches that itch.  He's also got that brash hotshot pilot thing that made Han so appealing.  Honestly, he feels like this franchise's stab at a rogue type and I think it works.  (I admit some bias because I'm also reading the Poe Dameron comic book and it's really good).  I'll also argue that we have only lived with Poe for 3 years, but we've lived with Han for 40, so time may prove Poe to be better than you think at first blush.

 

I really think if they had tightened that sequence up a bit, it's purpose would be more evident.

  • Report

Loved the movie because amongst all the new characters got more screen time (I am a big Poe fan BTW) and some good time with the older characters too.

 

"What I'm not looking forward to, is that J.J. Abrams will be back for Episode IX."

 

Oh F\/(|< no.  Geez, after Star Trek and Star Wars I think Abrams needs to stay way from Sci-Fi movies.   The man has no technical or scientific plausible sense to make a good movie of that type.

  • Report

I guess you don't need it, but I don't think it's out of place. 


I don’t necessarily think it’s out of place, I just think they spent way too much time on that part of the film for a minimal payoff. I’m not convinced downtrodden llama stable boys make for an evil enough empire. There needs to be something more sinister at work, and I think that was presented better at the beginning of The Force Awakens with the slaughter of the village.
 

We are definitely seeing different Poes.  I think he's a great character.  (I admit some bias because I'm also reading the Poe Dameron comic book and it's really good).  I'll also argue that we have only lived with Poe for 3 years, but we've lived with Han for 40, so time may prove Poe to be better than you think at first blush.


I haven’t read the comic, so I can only go by the two films. But Han Solo was already cool in 1977.

I think Poe’s “rogue” nature felt tacked onto this film, just for the sake of adding drama, since in the previous film he seemed to be their highly respected, ace hot-shot pilot. He didn’t seem like a rule breaker there.

Maybe he’ll become a more interesting character for me in the next film, but for now, I still think of him as a minor character, at best.
  • Report
Mark Hamill's own follow-up on The Last Jedi: https://twitter.com/...784443964309505
  • Report

Mark Hamill's own follow-up on The Last Jedi: https://twitter.com/...784443964309505

 

Sounds more like damage control. He's been way to vocal about not liking the film to have a sudden change of heart for no good reason aside from his dislike for the film getting traction online. He even went as far as saying he's only been to some of the events around the movie because he's contractually obligated to do so.

  • Report

♪  Bathrooms stinking like an open sewer, ♫

♫ Sticky messes on the floor

 

Gotta keep that Christmas spirit!

  • Report

Over Christmas we watched all of the Star Wars movies (in story order) before going to see Last Jedi.  

 

One of the things I liked about Last Jedi is how many of the plot points didn't take the easy & predictable ending.  There were lots of times where I thought, "that isn't what I expected".

 

Can someone explain why Vice Admiral Amilyn Holdo didn't reveal her escape plan to Poe?  Not doing so makes it seem like she had no plan, which kicked off the whole Finn / Rose stoyline that ultimately resulted in the First Order learning of the plan.

 

And while I could nit-pick the film to death, it was a decent addition to the Star Wars films - certainly better than it's immediate predecessor and in the top half of the list.

 

It will be interesting to see where the story goes from here as the Rebel Alliance tries to recover from being effectively wiped out from a military perspective.

  • Report

Can someone explain why Vice Admiral Amilyn Holdo didn't reveal her escape plan to Poe? 

 

 

Not doing so makes it seem like she had no plan, which kicked off the whole Finn / Rose stoyline that ultimately resulted in the First Order learning of the plan.

 

Exactly. :)

 

It's just a plot device.

  • Report