kiwilove's Blog

Part of education is learning the difference between its and it's:

www.its-not-its.info/

 

.. and when to use "," or "-".

Truth is always short, sharp, simple and to the point. You can answer the great questions of all time, with a simple yes or no... And most intelligent people should be able to know which is the correct answer. eg. Does "God" of religions exist? It's a definite no - because there is no evidence for it, and circular logic is only present. Religions do no research into their authenticity, provide no evidence - and above all do not invite discussion about their central ideas/concepts they promote. You have only to compare religion with science - and know that science has all manner of ongoing projects going - such as CERN, various astronomical observatories etc being built or have been built - and no religion has anything going in this kind of manner. Though there has been some archaeological uncoverings here and there.- which shed a little light. Hardcore evidence though is always lacking.

Actual truth is not like the romantic truth popularised for the public - that more often than not - it is thought provoking, controversial, hard to accept - and confronting. That a lot of concepts the public accepts - is simply not true.

Or that the public is fed a lot of nonsense - a lot of the time. This comes especially from religion(s) - and politicians of course.

 

I will say that a lot of the stories we are told - are not valid. Or endorse the wrong kind of values. Such as the hero stories as such. Stories in which the hero uses or resorts to violence to stop the evil doer - is sending the wrong message to the public/reader. This is endorsing "Might is Right" - whereas the overall message should be - be fair, or do good rather than commit evil. All the superhero stories are sending the wrong message home.

If we want a peaceful world in our future - we need to foster the correct mindset to bring that about. The answer is not to have better and better high tech weapons, etc etc. But to have a better educated public - who understands how evil comes about in the first place - by having people deprived of a decent way of life through inequality and hardship.

 

Of course, there has to be a method to deal with those who will commit murder and killing for their own ends. That such people will not change their ways through discussion and communication - and only in this extreme circumstance - one has to use violence to stop the violence being committed. In the current world situation - the answer should be - to have an international cooperative body of the best of the best - of the intelligence, police, military, etc to work as an international team - and given the permission to track down those who commit such evil to their source - to bring them to justice - but not to execution, but to lifetime imprisonment - so that they can serve as examples - to recognise such characters in future.

 

Religions should be recognised for what they are. That they mislead the public and their believers/followers with their incorrect and misinterpreted stories, etc etc and reveal the original stories they fail to tell. There is a version of Jesus/Jmmanuel that most people do not know of. It is a version in which the resurrection did not take place - that yes he did suffer on the cross - but was near death and taken down to be thought of as being dead. But that he was revived and did recover. He fled the scene - for fear of his life - made his way to Kashmir, where he lived out the rest of his life, and is buried there. The text - The Talmud Jmmanuel is thought to be the most accurate version of events. Anyone interested enough - can probably find a copy of this on the internet somewhere, although it is officially available through steelmark online I think. You should avoid the George Green version. The steelmark version is the latest/official version - but an earlier version is locatable.

Documentaries such as "Did Jesus Die?" - and "The Hidden Story of Jesus" present this story of Jesus in India.

 

Anyway in getting to the truth - you should have an open mind, and be willing to do some research and further reading, etc etc.

 

The text known as the The Holy Bible - is not so holy after all. Some parts of which could be said to be accurate - whereas other parts can be said to be not accurate at all. Of course, there are contradictions within the text itself - and claims of it being the word of God - and it is accurate is nonsense. The same can be said of the Koran - the same can be said of it being accurate. It is not. Like Biblical text - more often than not - it was not written not at the time of the events - why not? Weren't scribes present then? And it is said, that it was written down afterwards - as people recollected their memories, etc etc.

But if you were to even look at the story structure of the text - you should see that this is not the case at all. eg. Biblical text - it is not written from a personal viewpoint - but in third person.

 

Anyway all such stories can be said to contain some truth to them - and some stories could contain a lot more ....

There is the general view, most probably of man emerging from the ice age and becoming civilised - say from about 14,000 years ago or thereabouts... but it is not usually viewed, that this process was a cycle - of which how many times before has such a similar event happened? That of mankind having to restart all over again from a natural catacylsm. The story of Atlantis predates this, in which man causes his own destruction through warring with himself - Atlantis and Mu - their capitals being Florida and Mongolia - also in this time period (of ancient ancient history) - the story of our solar system being that Earth was not the only planet having life (also human life present) - but there were 2 others - being Mars and Malona (also called Phaeton) - this being the planet that now is the remains of the asteroid field - that the goldilocks zone was of 3 planets - that was radically changed when a great destroyer comet changed the orbits, which was a natural event as such - causing the destruction of one, and the radical change for Mars - having it's atmosphere ripped away, with it's orbit changed. Perhaps at this time - the Earth got's it Moon - which is a captured planet/moon as such - which was an outer orbit planet. It is easy to see that our Moon is not the earth's natural companion - because what other planet has a moon of this size? Only the 2 largest planets of our solar system - have sizeable moons, even Mars has what looks like to be captured asteroids, than true moons as such.

 

Anyway the full story can be read in a text titled "The 251st Contact Notes" by Billy Meier at the futureofmankind.co.uk website - and elsewhere.

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_251

Anyway it is quite an incredible text - and it will take some years to fully appreciate it - while it's only so many pages - it takes some years to fully appreciate what it contains...

 

Consider that man is suppose to be millions of years old (some 4 or 5?) and that we only know about the last 16,000 years in some detail - there is still some millions yet to be accounted for... Was man truly primitive during all that time....

 

Also consider the age of the dinosaurs - how long ago, and how long were they on this planet?

Also note how animals were supersized back then - and also the plant kingdom - trees etc would have been abundant...

 

You have only to acknowledge how silly our world religions are - when they teach us so much that is incorrect and distorted.

There is too much emphasis given to say the Middle Eastern religions/etc text - whereas there should have been more attention given to the Indian continent texts - which are far older - and said to be less misinterpreted etc - ie. are more accurate texts than that of the early Israelites/etc.

There is never any acknowledgement given to how self-promoting they were - how they most probably stole/borrowed from other cultures their stories etc to claim as their own. The same fault with the Holy Bible - is present with muslim/islamic text too.

All religions suffer from the same circular logic - whereby they do not question their own material - as to how accurate is it?