Retrospect Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 If this is an issue at my end, I would not be surprised at all. There's something wrong with this PC but then I got it cheap. Maybes one of my RAM chips is on the turn. It identifies having 2gb of ram though when I go to the specs thing in the settings. Gawd knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+arcadeshopper Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 If this is an issue at my end, I would not be surprised at all. There's something wrong with this PC but then I got it cheap. Maybes one of my RAM chips is on the turn. It identifies having 2gb of ram though when I go to the specs thing in the settings. Gawd knows. Easy to run memtest.. boot a ubuntu CD or USB and pick memtest.. Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tursi Posted September 12, 2018 Author Share Posted September 12, 2018 If this is an issue at my end, I would not be surprised at all. There's something wrong with this PC but then I got it cheap. Maybes one of my RAM chips is on the turn. It identifies having 2gb of ram though when I go to the specs thing in the settings. Gawd knows. I don't see a PC problem there, either. You're looking for a really narrowly defined data structure. If the data was malformed or corrupt, the loop will only check every third byte in VDP memory and one of them has to be a '3' or it will just fall out - that's unlikely. The spin loop is more likely. I think you just have a bug in your TI code, cause that's a strange structure. Why not post the actual code and comments for what it's trying to do? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted September 12, 2018 Share Posted September 12, 2018 Easy to run memtest.. boot a ubuntu CD or USB and pick memtest.. Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk Exactly what I did to find my bad RAM STICK. But under OS X I can rip off Linux apps and run them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willie1914 Posted September 17, 2018 Share Posted September 17, 2018 Hello everyone, I've just downloaded the latest version of Classic99 and I'm getting a (generic, I believe) warning from Windows Defender. I think that that last version of Classic99 that I have running on my Windows 10 laptop is two version old, and it didn't spawn this warning. I assume that everything is fine with the download, and am hoping this has something to do with the last series of updates from MicroSoft. Has anyone else encountered this issue? Thanks in advance, Willie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tursi Posted September 18, 2018 Author Share Posted September 18, 2018 You're likely to get a warning the first time you run it because it's not signed, and Windows is drifting that way. (I've looked into a software signing key, but still trying to justify the cost). If you have any doubt whatsoever I am happy to recommend the virustotal website - you can scan the zip file from from my own website without downloading it, or upload your own copy to be verified. -- https://www.virustotal.com As of the current build, VirusTotal hadn't analyzed the file for about six months, so I asked it to reanalyze, and it's still claiming clean. https://www.virustotal.com/#/url/054e3950300d979200bfb950b992fcd6b26dc51f8d0f85c0d32c0c2c3427dbb0/detection I get the concern, though... these days, you really can't trust anything. :/ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrhodes Posted September 18, 2018 Share Posted September 18, 2018 (edited) What worries me is that windows may try to enforce mandatory application signing. Essentially they are trying to make it so that unless you download from a source microsoft themselves approve of then you will not be able to run it. (that is where i see windows heading by 5 years from now) I am still sticking back on windows 8, and have no plans to go to a newer windows version. Edited September 18, 2018 by jrhodes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Schmitzi Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 uiiih, v3.99, so we are running out of version numbers before the "big" v4.00 change OkiDoki I was wrong 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tursi Posted September 26, 2018 Author Share Posted September 26, 2018 I considered just claiming the number was in hex for a while, but this was easier 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Schmitzi Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 so for now, we have 996 updates left, before the "big" v4 one 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RXB Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 I just gave up on version numbers myself and the version is now year. No more versions between years. Personally my files are Time stamped now. *********************************************************** * GROM HEADER *********************************************************** GROM >6000 AORG 0 DATA >AA12 * VALID GROM / VERSION 18 DATA >0100 * (FUTURE EXPANSION) DATA >0000 * POWERUP DATA XBCART * PROGRAMS DATA >0000 * DSR DATA LINK1 * CALL DATA >0000 * INTERUPT DATA >0000 * BASIC CALL Unlikely >12 in Hex or 18 in Decimal will ever reach >63 or the year 2099 unless I live to be 145 years old, would be nice, but unlikely. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tursi Posted October 14, 2018 Author Share Posted October 14, 2018 Bugfix for CRU timer - 399.004 -reset more of CRU on menu-reset -add 9901 timer to the debug register pane -don't reset the 9901 timer every time you leave timer mode (fix for CamelForth) -more disk DSR warnings (hate that disk DSR so much...) -allow the disk corruption break option to catch the DSR warnings too -update manual for 9901 line -no longer UPX packing the exe http://harmlesslion.com/software/classic99 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega-TI Posted October 14, 2018 Share Posted October 14, 2018 Even with Real Iron, I still use my Classic 99! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith99er Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 Howdy, - just tried to download Classic99 but the website says - Forbidden You don't have permission to access /software/Classic99 on this server. It that a problem my side or yours? Ta! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrhodes Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 Not just you, i am getting the same error. Everything OK tursi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atrax27407 Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 I get an "internal server error" - Tursi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+adamantyr Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 And swiftly panic spread throughout the TI community... "NO!!!! I need Classic99!!!!" 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retrospect Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 #MeToo Maybes he's working on something and doesn't want anyone downloading it until it's done? Just a guess. I wouldn't panic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega-TI Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 #MeToo Maybes he's working on something and doesn't want anyone downloading it until it's done? Just a guess. I wouldn't panic. Naw, his web page works until you get to the specific files section and the error comes up on all the program in that section. I'm sure he'll get it fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tursi Posted October 30, 2018 Author Share Posted October 30, 2018 Nope, had no idea. Will take a look Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tursi Posted October 30, 2018 Author Share Posted October 30, 2018 Should be okay now, thanks for letting me know! Was a combination of things - upgrade to Apache 2.2 a week or so ago broke a lot of configuration, and I missed some relative to the rewrite rules (so if you clicked your way in, Classic99 came up, but if you used the direct URL, it broke). Also one of the script files was corrupt - I have a macro-enabled keyboard, and it looks like just as I was saving the script file, I bumped one of the macro keys. Odd, scripts don't work when they start with "Rainbow #!/bin/python" My bad for not testing that part correctly. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atrax27407 Posted October 30, 2018 Share Posted October 30, 2018 That appears to have fixed the problem. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opry99er Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 Don't know if this is the place for this... but: I'm trying to install Classic99 on my son's Win10 Home laptop. It is a 64 bit computer with 2GB of RAM running on an Intel Ceeron 1.60GHz professor. I get this and nothing else when I try to launch. The folder was extracted to a folder in the root of C:/ Any help you could offer would be great! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Torrax Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 You can try moving it from "C:\Program Files\Classic99" to something more like "C:\Emuls\Classic99". And see if that works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+arcadeshopper Posted December 6, 2018 Share Posted December 6, 2018 You can try moving it from "C:\Program Files\Classic99" to something more like "C:\Emuls\Classic99". And see if that works. I put mine under the downloads folder, always have rights there.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.