8Bitjunkie Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 AWESOME! thanks a lot for that great tool! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrathchild Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Running on 32bit WinXP - Chrome - the resulting executable looks like skewed lines Running on IE8 (probably not supported - Webpage error details User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB7.5; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Timestamp: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 22:04:33 UTC Message: Object doesn't support this property or method Line: 27 Char: 5 Code: 0 URI: file:///D:/UTILS/JAG-Creator/JAG-Creator/script/FileSaver.js Message: 'Uint8Array' is undefined Line: 220 Char: 712 Code: 0 URI: file:///D:/UTILS/JAG-Creator/JAG-Creator/script/jagcreator.js Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Running on 32bit WinXP - Chrome - the resulting executable looks like skewed lines You seriously use Windows XP today? I kicked that Virus and Malware sucker with the 1st release of Vista in 2007... and now it's 7, 8 ... 8.1 ... year 2015 and ....Windows 10 is coming The tool works great in 8.1 with IE 11.... btw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathy Posted January 7, 2015 Share Posted January 7, 2015 Hello guys You're still using Windows today? Mac OS X 10.10.2 is coming. Sincerely Mathy 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Hello guys You're still using Windows today? Mac OS X 10.10.2 is coming. Sincerely Mathy Why should I downgrade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 (edited) The best feature of this tool is the conversion speed. In theory one could do a webbrowser, with some "resizer" before the Data enters the Atari, viewing any graphics in a "recognizable" format. cat.xex spidi.xex Edited January 8, 2015 by emkay 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irgendwer Posted January 8, 2015 Author Share Posted January 8, 2015 Running on 32bit WinXP - Chrome - the resulting executable looks like skewed lines Running on IE8 (probably not supported - Hmm... the result should look like skewed lines... (screenshot?). Only problem with Chromium I have, is the recognition of the right mouse button (maybe I add something here). IE8 is much too old. Current Firefox under WinXP (if it has to be this OS) runs the program perfectly. BTW: My environment is Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS - proving that the application is really platform independent . (Runs on my Phablet too). Thanks for feedback and esp. for the both donations - you know who you are! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matosimi Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 (edited) You seriously use Windows XP today? I kicked that Virus and Malware sucker with the 1st release of Vista in 2007... and now it's 7, 8 ... 8.1 ... year 2015 and ....Windows 10 is coming The tool works great in 8.1 with IE 11.... btw. Nice tool, it must be really "delivery" doing it in JS. Anyway, I have troubles utilizing right click. IE11 nor Opera responds (win8.1)... is there any other way to set register (arrow) in settings window? Edited January 8, 2015 by matosimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irgendwer Posted January 8, 2015 Author Share Posted January 8, 2015 Anyway, I have troubles utilizing right click. IE11 nor Opera responds (win8.1)... is there any other way to set register (arrow) in settings window? I will add an alternative operation soon (see above). Until then, you are forced to select the colours manually with the selector, when not it FF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matosimi Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 (edited) I will add an alternative operation soon (see above). Until then, you are forced to select the colours manually with the selector, when not it FF. Ah, ok. I was bit confused, thought I was doing something wrong. Also other bug... range stopped working after several clicks... so even if I set range for color, whole column gets filled with selected color. -my bad, now i know that range is filled with color when i click it... (i clicked buttons above columns before) anyway, very nice work, do you plan to publish it somewhere online? I'm quite surprised you did so nice manual, it must took some serious time... Edited January 8, 2015 by matosimi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Nice tool, it must be really "delivery" doing it in JS. Anyway, I have troubles utilizing right click. IE11 nor Opera responds (win8.1)... is there any other way to set register (arrow) in settings window? Funny, I have to admit that feature doesn't work in IE11. Didn't need that as I prefered to set the colours by visuals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashjazzcat Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Can't get right-click register advance to work in Chrome under Win 7 32-bit. Installed Firefox and JAG-Creator actually hangs the browser. Great looking tool, though - dying to process some pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sikor Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 (edited) Hello guys You're still using Windows today? Mac OS X 10.10.2 is coming. Sincerely Mathy Wrong real men still using MyDOS 4.53 Edited January 8, 2015 by Sikor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathy Posted January 8, 2015 Share Posted January 8, 2015 Hello Sikor You mean MyDOS 4.55 beta 4. Sincerely Mathy 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 (edited) And two others And some Bug, as the saved picture shows "garbage" . I only encountered that with one image and it is repeatable. Edited January 9, 2015 by emkay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 (edited) That's how it looks... And, what the heck is wrong with the attachement handling today ? garbage.xex rubik.xex cdinterieur.xex Edited January 9, 2015 by emkay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irgendwer Posted January 10, 2015 Author Share Posted January 10, 2015 That's how it looks... Could you please supply the source image and JCM so that I may be able to reproduce the bug? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 10, 2015 Share Posted January 10, 2015 Could you please supply the source image and JCM so that I may be able to reproduce the bug? I found the solution already. When the picture is smaller than 320 pixel, it's shown correctly, but it saves the picture with that lesser resolution, resulting in that lining garbage. Resizing the image before, everything is fine. One request, if possible: The colour chosing seems to have a priority in chosing colours. Is it possible to set a preferred colour? It doesn't set "red" because a grey is already at that position, and if you remove the grey, it ajusts the whole colour range instead of using red. alien.xex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irgendwer Posted January 10, 2015 Author Share Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) Running on 32bit WinXP - Chrome - the resulting executable looks like skewed lines Maybe the same issue as above? Edited January 10, 2015 by Irgendwer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irgendwer Posted January 10, 2015 Author Share Posted January 10, 2015 One request, if possible: The colour chosing seems to have a priority in chosing colours. Is it possible to set a preferred colour? It doesn't set "red" because a grey is already at that position, and if you remove the grey, it ajusts the whole colour range instead of using red. Yes, I'm aware of that problem. Pure mathematics (see chapter 5, point 3 in the manual). I tought already about user influence for colour mapping (preferring colour even brightness is more off). I may add it, even this forces stronger grille effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wally1 Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 this art is incredible may I dare ask what Atari graphics mode is this? it looks like gr. 8 but with many colors some sort of hybrid mode ... thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Yes, I'm aware of that problem. Pure mathematics (see chapter 5, point 3 in the manual). I tought already about user influence for colour mapping (preferring colour even brightness is more off). I may add it, even this forces stronger grille effect. Possibly it could help to use the 16 values for gr. 9 for calculations. At least it could be possible to get the right colour in those scanlines, which would be fairly enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emkay Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) this art is incredible may I dare ask what Atari graphics mode is this? it looks like gr. 8 but with many colors some sort of hybrid mode ... thanks It's interleaved "gr.10/gr.9" . It's actually 80 pixels per scanline and the different modes create that half pixel offset. The colours were used to be as close as possible together, to remove the most scanline artefacts. As long as the same colours can be used, it looks like a solid graphicsmode. In the alien picture , you see scanlines, because gr. 9 has 16 shades of a colour and paletted modes ( Gr.10 )use 8 shades. As long as those "grille" effect is that small, it doesn't interfere with the image. Vice Versa, the 16 shades enhance the depth and overall view of the image clearly. Edited January 11, 2015 by emkay 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrathchild Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 Maybe the same issue as above? Yes it was, Emkay's identification of the 320 pixel thing now lets the executable show the image correctly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wally1 Posted January 11, 2015 Share Posted January 11, 2015 thanks emkay interleaved meaning something like page flipping, maybe..? thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.