Jump to content

Photo

Coleco Chameleon .... hardware speculations?


11829 replies to this topic

#2001 Reaperman OFFLINE  

Reaperman

    Quadrunner

  • 5,965 posts
  • Location:New Orleans, LA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:35 PM

It's a shame we haven't seen too many higher-end asic game sytems.

I haven't seen one yet that outputs RGB or better.  This is more an effect of the price point they're aimed at than anything, I suppose.

Naturally, the FPGA systems, being far more expensive devices, tend to have nice video options.

 

Since Mike doesn't want to patch, why's he doing FPGA at all?  Throw an asic in each cart and be done with it...

Or heck, throw 'the big three' asics in the system and basically create a 'super retro trio' that costs more, has far fewer games and comes in limited edition, transparent jag shells.


Edited by Reaperman, Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:50 PM.


#2002 phoenixdownita OFFLINE  

phoenixdownita

    River Patroller

  • Topic Starter
  • 3,560 posts

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:41 PM

...

Throw an asic in each cart and be done with it...

Somebody's gotta design them .... of the 2 hw guys so far (RVGS first then CC now), one was last seen "been thrown under a bus", the other (undisclosed as of now) allegedly had sticky issues with a roll of electric tape at a toy fair  :grin:


Edited by phoenixdownita, Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:44 PM.


#2003 Flojomojo OFFLINE  

Flojomojo

    You can't handle the truth. No truth-handler, you.

  • 16,411 posts
  • I deride your truth-handling abilities.

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:50 PM

So, let me get this straight .... FPGA for retro gaming is in the early stages, and isn't really ready for commercial applications, even though it's going to be ubiquitous in the future. Being first is probably a handicap, not desirable. Reminds me of a mid-1990's "64-bit" system. Ironic that they have the same casing.

#2004 mickcris OFFLINE  

mickcris

    Moonsweeper

  • 485 posts
  • Location:Texas

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:55 PM

saw this a bit ago on youtube and thought is was pretty funny.  not sure who made it



#2005 goldenegg OFFLINE  

goldenegg

    River Patroller

  • 2,302 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:55 PM

Random thought, why does anyone care about how much an item that entertains you for hours on end costs?  I mean this forum is full of people who will pay several thousand dollars for a single boxed game, just to shove it onto a shelve, why cry over a $100 FPGA?

 

 

I don't think anyone has an issue with paying what it would cost to get a solid FPGA based system.  That's why so many of use are watching KevTris' project like hawks and will be shoving money in his face the moment it's available.

 

Where the issue comes in is that doing an FPGA based system shouldn't have half-assed and needs to be done right.  Otherwise, there's just no benefit.



#2006 CPUWIZ OFFLINE  

CPUWIZ

    Commander

  • 34,993 posts
  • I am the one who knocks!
  • Location:SoCal

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:56 PM

So, let me get this straight .... FPGA for retro gaming is in the early stages, and isn't really ready for commercial applications, even though it's going to be ubiquitous in the future. Being first is probably a handicap, not desirable. Reminds me of a mid-1990's "64-bit" system. Ironic that they have the same casing.

 

No, Kevin has been working with them on retro-gaming applications for over 10 years.



#2007 kevtris OFFLINE  

kevtris

    Dragonstomper

  • 747 posts
  • FPGA Whisperer
  • Location:Flyover, USA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:56 PM

Dumb Question time;

Okay, so it looks like everyone's just going to be rehashing the same lack of news from now until the kickstarter, I thought it might be a good time to ask a dumb question. Maybe I am not the only one wondering about this…

At the risk of sounding trollish, I want to ask -

What's the big deal with FPGA? Why is it considered the "gold standard" for emulation?

If we had a gate level specification of, say, the SNES video chip, then I guess anyone could implement it with gate arrays, and we would be confident that the implementation would be accurate.

But, we don't have a gate level spec. The SNES video chip is a "black box" to us - all we have are the results of people's experiments ("when I write to this address, this happened)" and people's ideas about what is going on inside.

So. the FPGA programmer has to try and recreate the design based on this incomplete knowledge. I imagine the quality and accuracy of the result is more dependent on the experience and skill of the programmer than anything else. There is nothing magical about using a gate array that makes this redesigned chip automatically more accurate than a software emulation of that chip, is there?

 

Part of the reason is because "it's there".   These days, technology has advanced enough where there's excellent tools for doing more than black box reverse engineering.  While this is still a big part of it, there's access to affordable decapping now.  We've been working on decapping various chips to figure out exactly what goes on at a gate level, and this has been very successful on the NES.   The SNES SPC chips have been decapped and have been giving up some of their secrets.  Cheapish very high end logic analyzers can now be had for peanuts on ebay, so I have been using one of those to probe the inner secrets of various systems to get exact cycle timing for things.   This isn't an exact gate level, but lots of the time you can predict exactly how something must work by the evidence produced.

 

Of course this info can be used to make software emulators better too.   I work on FPGA stuff because I find it interesting and it's kind of a simulation more at the hardware level of how a real system works, complete with all its quirks, timing, and other characteristics.  Getting all these things right in a software emulator can be difficult and take a very high end CPU if you wish to have a really good low level emulation.  Obviously, a cheaper (CPU cycles) less accurate emulation will play most of the games in an acceptable fashion.   You might look at it as listening to music on a pair of $2 ear buds vs. a $500 pair of high end over the ear headphones.



#2008 Flojomojo OFFLINE  

Flojomojo

    You can't handle the truth. No truth-handler, you.

  • 16,411 posts
  • I deride your truth-handling abilities.

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 4:58 PM

this forum is full of people who will pay several thousand dollars for a single boxed game, just to shove it onto a shelve


As they say on Wikipedia, [citation needed]. While I'm sure there are some rich collectors here, I wouldn't say AA is "full" of them.

My general impression of our membership is more of people who haunt flea markets or online auctions looking for deals, and people who haven't bought a new game since the turn of the century.

#2009 AE35 OFFLINE  

AE35

    Chopper Commander

  • 150 posts
  • Location:Kingdom of Denmark

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:03 PM

 

He won a lot of points here in the RVGS debacle.  He showed us how not only was the RVGS nonexistent on the hardware front, but even on the software side.  When a game producer says that he has no idea how a game will get ported to a system its promised-for, people take note.  It would be like the Chameleon hardware guy stepping up and saying, "We have no real prototype."

 

Is guilt-by-association fair?  Beats me and I completely understand if you feel that way.  Piko/Eli seems to be taking more of a wait-and-see attitude about the Chameleon.  Contrast with CollectorVision (as mentioned earlier), where they produced half-hour infomercials on RVGS where it was only briefly mentioned toward the end of the video that the pack-in game was theirs.  That seems a less forgivable offense to me.

 

It is a good point! I never liked Gamester81 and his videos at all...so I don't expect anything from him/them either way. I can't get more away from them. All I know from Piko is this strange relationship between them and Mike Kennedys project, that everyone seems to think is a con, really. After the Retro VGS video with John Carlsen showing where power goes in and where video comes out and the mini-snes in a jag shell-farce, I am just amazed at how you can choose to take a wait-and-see stance.

 

There's another guy in here who defends Mike Kennedy because Mike is his friend(by his own statement, not mine)...he doesn't get a pass.

 

I am wrong all the time, I might be wrong here. I thought I remembered Piko being at Mikes booth, but I think it was somebody else now.

 

Thanks,

 

Nicholas

 

Edit: Not that I don't like the MAN, Gamerster81 :)


Edited by AE35, Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:14 PM.


#2010 Nathan Strum OFFLINE  

Nathan Strum

    Quadrunner

  • 8,433 posts
  • Enjoying a sandwich
  • Location:Newhall, CA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:04 PM

Random thought, why does anyone care about how much an item that entertains you for hours on end costs?

 
 I don't. What I care about are games that would actually entertain me for hours. As of yet, I've seen none for the Chameleon that fit that criteria, and have to be convinced they actually have any actual hardware that will run the games they have mentioned.
 

I mean this forum is full of people who will pay several thousand dollars for a single boxed game, just to shove it onto a shelve, why cry over a $100 FPGA?

 

Full of? No. Are there some here? Yes. Enough to make a product like the Chameleon a success? No. And I suspect part of this is what lies at the root of the problem. Mike has seen games go for outrageous prices on Game Grovel, and assumes that the handful of high-profile, big-spending collectors that he's seen are the norm for retrogamers, and not the exception.



#2011 jaybird3rd OFFLINE  

jaybird3rd

    Quadrunner

  • 9,283 posts
  • "Excuse me, sir? I have a question ..."
  • Location:806.4616.0110

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:09 PM

Somebody's gotta design them .... of the 2 hw guys so far (RVGS first then CC now), one was last seen "been thrown under a bus", the other (undisclosed as of now) allegedly had sticky issues with a roll of electric tape at a toy fair  :grin:

I can't imagine why any "hardware guy" would want to work for Mike, given his history with them.  "Hardware guys" are to the RVGS/Chameleon project exactly what redshirts were to the Starship Enterprise.



#2012 Reaperman OFFLINE  

Reaperman

    Quadrunner

  • 5,965 posts
  • Location:New Orleans, LA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:11 PM

x0TwE0tm.jpg



#2013 CPUWIZ OFFLINE  

CPUWIZ

    Commander

  • 34,993 posts
  • I am the one who knocks!
  • Location:SoCal

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:11 PM

 
 I don't. What I care about are games that would actually entertain me for hours. As of yet, I've seen none for the Chameleon that fit that criteria, and have to be convinced they actually have any actual hardware that will run the games they have mentioned.
 

 

Full of? No. Are there some here? Yes. Enough to make a product like the Chameleon a success? No. And I suspect part of this is what lies at the root of the problem. Mike has seen games go for outrageous prices on Game Grovel, and assumes that the handful of high-profile, big-spending collectors that he's seen are the norm for retrogamers, and not the exception.

 

True, the content is a problem, but not the price.  I am not rich, I just know how to collect money long enough to buy what I desire.  I have zero interest in this "console", I was just throwing out the fact that people cried about the original $300 price point.

 

I guarantee you, this forum has enough collectors of high value items, to reach 7 figures easily.



#2014 Reaperman OFFLINE  

Reaperman

    Quadrunner

  • 5,965 posts
  • Location:New Orleans, LA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:19 PM

 I was just throwing out the fact that people cried about the original $300 price point.

 

 

I think they were mostly complaining because that price falls into the 'splaining to the wife*' range, where if it was half of that I might just be able to sneak it by...

 

*at least in my household



#2015 CPUWIZ OFFLINE  

CPUWIZ

    Commander

  • 34,993 posts
  • I am the one who knocks!
  • Location:SoCal

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:22 PM

 

I think they were mostly complaining because that price falls into the 'splaining to the wife*' range, where if it was half of that I might just be able to sneak it by...

 

*at least in my household

 

You need to do what many people do, open a "toy account". ;)



#2016 Reaperman OFFLINE  

Reaperman

    Quadrunner

  • 5,965 posts
  • Location:New Orleans, LA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:23 PM

 

You need to do what many people do, open a "toy account". ;)

I have an allowance, but it's only $10/day and I want it now!--I want it now!--I want it now! :P


Edited by Reaperman, Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:24 PM.


#2017 CPUWIZ OFFLINE  

CPUWIZ

    Commander

  • 34,993 posts
  • I am the one who knocks!
  • Location:SoCal

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:25 PM

I have an allowance, but it's only $10/day and I want it now!--I want it now!--I want it now! :P

 

Hehe, yes, without patience it doesn't work. :D



#2018 Flojomojo OFFLINE  

Flojomojo

    You can't handle the truth. No truth-handler, you.

  • 16,411 posts
  • I deride your truth-handling abilities.

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:27 PM

I guarantee you, this forum has enough collectors of high value items, to reach 7 figures easily.


That makes sense ... I'm sure there are enough enthusiasts to scratch together a million dollars for something awesome that was clearly worth it. Retro VGS Chameleon isn't it, though.

I wonder about the "lessons learned" that will come out of this. I sure hope no one takes away that pricing was the main problem with this project. Soft demand, maybe. Botched communication for sure. Failure to listen to the market, absolutely. I would hate for anyone trying to do this right to be discouraged or negatively affected by the lousy execution of this project.

Kevtris, you're our only hope

#2019 Pipercub OFFLINE  

Pipercub

    Moonsweeper

  • 298 posts

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:33 PM

My replica so far, I am waiting on the extensions and a few other bits for authenticity, but this is how I imagine it was constructed.

 

 

Attached Thumbnails

  • jag1.JPG
  • jag2.JPG
  • jag3.JPG


#2020 Reaperman OFFLINE  

Reaperman

    Quadrunner

  • 5,965 posts
  • Location:New Orleans, LA

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:38 PM

Wow, you even left the corner open.

That attention to detail suggests that you were trying way harder than the original putz.



#2021 AE35 OFFLINE  

AE35

    Chopper Commander

  • 150 posts
  • Location:Kingdom of Denmark

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:40 PM

Great job on the replica :)

 

So, how do Mike get people to sign on to be part of something like putting a mini-SNES pcb in a jaguar? It must be something

like: "We have to do it for now, just til we get the protoype going" - that way it is not *really* cheating, but just buying time!

 

I am curious as to how the person-to-person interaction is.


Edited by AE35, Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:41 PM.


#2022 PlaysWithWolves OFFLINE  

PlaysWithWolves

    Stargunner

  • 1,843 posts

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:47 PM

My replica so far, I am waiting on the extensions and a few other bits for authenticity, but this is how I imagine it was constructed.

 
 
You even spray-painted it?  That's above-and-beyond stuff right there.
Bonus points for showing us how to properly hard-wire controllers.

#2023 madman OFFLINE  

madman

    River Patroller

  • 2,873 posts
  • Location:127.0.0.1

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:48 PM

My replica so far, I am waiting on the extensions and a few other bits for authenticity, but this is how I imagine it was constructed.

 

When does your KS launch?



#2024 Retro Nick OFFLINE  

Retro Nick

    Star Raider

  • 81 posts
  • Location:Oklahoma

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:49 PM

My replica so far, I am waiting on the extensions and a few other bits for authenticity, but this is how I imagine it was constructed.


Those conrollers are not "hard wired" into the system, you slanderous fraud!

#2025 remowilliams OFFLINE  

remowilliams

    Quadrunner

  • 10,609 posts
  • Location:Detonation Boulevard

Posted Sat Feb 20, 2016 5:55 PM

My replica so far, I am waiting on the extensions and a few other bits for authenticity, but this is how I imagine it was constructed.

 

 

BvWSew.jpg








Recent blog entries on this topic

Photo

From: Coleco Chameleon .... hardware speculations?

By Serguei2 in Robin Gravel's Blog, on Tue Mar 8, 2016 9:32 PM

If only Coleco Chameleon was true, I would buy it
 
Unfortunately, it's seem it's a prank after all.
 
  
Source: Coleco Chameleon .... hardware speculations?

Read Full Entry and Comments →

0 user(s) are browsing this forum

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users