Jump to content
IGNORED

Testing CRT Screen Size


Thomas Jentzsch

Recommended Posts

NTSC

Sylvania 32"

 

(Heavy 6'er, RF output)

It was kind of interesting to watch the screen stop rolling then display multiple, stable images, each much shorter vertically than the displayed scan line count as I ran the total scan lines way up above a reasonable number.

Is that an old TV with a rounded screen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been off of AtariAge for years, and got sucked back in today when I saw that a Atari Flashback Portable is available with SD card. I have a Harmony cart and will see if I can get it setup today/tomorrow. The only CRT TVs I have left are my 9" DVD combo, and my 250 lb Sony WEGA 36" which has not seen power in years.

Do you care which Atari I test with? I pretty much 1 of every, 4sw, 6sw (heavy and light), Jr, 7800...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My results (NTSC Memorex 9" DVD Combo): (FWIW, it is rock steady even at 257)

  • Cold - NTSC: 28, 215, 19 (but really if you ignore the top left and bottom right corner 27 217 18)
  • Warm - NTSC: 27, 217, 18 (but really if you ignore the top left and bottom right corner 26 218 18)

I think the tube is a smidge clockwise in the cabinet.

Testing on my behemoth 36" WEGA will have to wait a bit, maybe later today or tomorrow.

Edited by Pioneer4x4
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ran the 1.2

 

My results (NTSC Memorex 9" DVD Combo): (FWIW, it is rock steady even at 257)

  • Cold - NTSC: 27, 216, 19 with seeing Warm - NTSC: 27, 217, 18 (at the 80)
  • The lowest it will go without rolling is 17 204 04
  • The highest is 45 211 40
  • The most lines in the center I could get seems to be 19 220 11 FWIW
  • Warm - NTSC 28 218 18

All were with just ½ a pixel cut off top left and bottom right, so assuming it was straight, maybe 1 less on either end and perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for testing. Can you test again with color switch at B&W too?

 

I am surprised that there are any differences at all.

OK here are the results:

 

(No B&W switch on the 7800)

 

ATARI 2600 4 switch PAL CVBS - 33/255/24

ATARI 2600 junior PAL Antenna - 32/257/23

Edited by Tigerduck
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have updated the results in the first post.

 

Summary: Especially old TVs with rounded corners, can only display 200 (NTSC) respectively 240 (PAL) or less scan lines at full width. If you limit the tested width to 60% (thus excluding the corners), you can use ~10-15 extra scan lines.

 

Conclusion: If you make sure that nothing relevant is displayed in the corners (e.g. display a typical centered score at the top or bottom), you can use 210 (NTSC)/ 250 (PAL) scan lines. And even more, if you ignore certain TVs which have an incorrect, too much zoomed setup (e.g. maybe like Tigerduck's JVC from the post above).

Edited by Thomas Jentzsch
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK here are the results:

 

ATARI 2600 4 switch PAL CVBS - 33/255/24

ATARI 2600 junior PAL Antenna - 32/257/23

Is that JVC an old TV with rounded corners? If yes, maybe you can repeat your tests with version 1.2

 

If not, then your set up is pretty much off. The picture is too much zoomed vertically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Conclusion: If you make sure that nothing relevant is displayed in the corners (e.g. display a typical centered score at the top or bottom), you can use 210 (NTSC)/ 250 (PAL) scan lines. And even more, if you ignore certain TVs which have an incorrect, too much zoomed setup (e.g. maybe like Tigerduck's JVC from the post above).

 

Thank you for doing this and to everyone who replied. With a display of more than 192 scan lines, what would you recommend doing with the vertical blank and over scan... take half the extra scan lines off of each?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for bringing together this testing, Thomas. Reviewing the results, a majority average of 224.1 visible display lines for NTSC is reassuring to see, but not surprising.


The 192 figure is definitely a reference in utilization of much older CRTs from the 60's-70's that had a greater area of the screen cut off from view for the vast majority of displays. This includes harmonizing with the computers from that era, such as the Apple II (280x192) and Atari 400/800 (Max 320x192).


If we take a look at resolutions listed for consoles regarding what was put into practice as reference in the mid 80's/early 90's for the NTSC regions...


NES = 256x224

SMS = 256x224

Genesis = 320x224

SNES = 256x224


...including looking at Stella's younger sister Maria...


Atari 7800 = 160x240/320x240; however, in practice, the max number of lines ever utilized (I.E. Water Ski and Tank Command) is exactly 224...


...the test results make complete sense. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19" Zenith CRT (circa 1997)

 

Atari 2600 Vader NTSC & Atari 7800 (with expansion connector) NTSC using version 1.2 of the screen size software:

 

18 196 12 - smallest stable size (226 total)

32 206 26 - typical size (262 total)

45 210 40 - biggest stable size (295 total)

 

Note: It seems my TV displays too far to the right though, so I do have some cut-off on the right-side corners. I'd approximate its about 4pixels too far to the right. I've tried to compensate with the numbers, so I might be a little bit off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Are you sure NES outputs 224 scanlines? I read everywhere that it is 240 actually. Of course not all 240 are used for active playfield - due to those reasons.

 

Correct. The 224 reference for the NES, as in the case of 7800 Water Ski/Tank Command, is not what it actively puts out - both consoles are 240p, but what is actually utilized (..."put into practice"...) as reference, for how many lines are visible on the screen. Taking into account an average of 8 scanlines cut from the top and 8 scanlines cut from the bottom (240-8-8 = 224), 224 scanlines is the reference for what is seen on the average NTSC (CRT) screen.

 

The results reported for Thomas' test fortifies that fact with the majority of NTSC displays reporting an average of 224.1 visible scanlines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for bringing together this testing, Thomas. Reviewing the results, a majority average of 224.1 visible display lines for NTSC is reassuring to see, but not surprising.

Well, the 224 lines are only visible over 60% of the screen width. If you want to display something important in the corners, you must got down quite a few lines (~200).

 

The 192 figure is definitely a reference in utilization of much older CRTs from the 60's-70's that had a greater area of the screen cut off from view for the vast majority of displays.

I think the 192 is a shortcut for rounded corners. Those old TVs could display more than 200 lines for sure, but not (always) in the corners. So Atari simplified the problem and defined 192 in the programmer's guide.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...