Jump to content
IGNORED

OT: No clue where to start looking for a new PC that meets my requirements.


Omega-TI

Recommended Posts

HELP! Suggestions & comments welcome!

 

Okay, maybe I want too much in my next PC... but for MINIMUM specifications I'd like....

 

3 monitors at least 20" in physical size with a minimum resolution of: 1920 X 1080 each (preferably HDMI) and a fast graphics card to match.

 

A minimum of 16GB RAM

No clue what processor, but I want to speed up video editing projects.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do almost all my shopping for PC equipment on NewEgg... they have a great review system and prices that are pretty competitive to Amazon, for more common consumer parts such as monitors.

 

Are you looking to just get a complete PC system without having to muck about installing stuff? If so, you probably want to look at gamer rig's, they require a similar approach to video editing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to build my own systems with newegg supplying the parts..

 

You are looking at an expensive system if you want something that can do that many monitors etc..

 

if you go that way Get:

I7 processor or better

16gb ram or more

Nividia video card that is >350$ in price I say that because there are some cheap versions that don't have the power to do multi displays like you want

Asus motherboard

Western digital drives or intel/samsung ssd

 

Or just buy one of these:

http://www.qvc.com/qvc.product.E290065.html?ref=GAS&cm_mmc=GOOGLESHOPPINGFEED-_-GShopping|L|BrandProduct|electronics|computers-_-pla-_-sXrzoxwtH|dc_193217060102__E290065_&mkwid=sXrzoxwtH|dc_pcrid_193217060102_pkw__pmt__productid_E290065_&cvosrc=pla.google.E290065&cvo_crid=193217060102&matchtype=shopping

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, you are not looking at a laptop for sure. ;-)

 

Based on your requirements I assume money is not a factor?

 

Triple-headed system is going to require a heavy-weight video card, or a pair of video cards. Big power supply too. At the resolution you specified you might want to consider a single 4K monitor (get a big one if you go 4K, at least 30" or more). One *real* 4K (3840x2160) monitor would be like having four 1920x1080 resolution monitors. I have a 27" 4K monitor on a computer... it is a lot of pixels, and it really needs to be a little bigger physically (that's why I say get one that is 30" or more). Ever since high-resolution wide screen monitors came out I quite doing multi-monitor systems. A single monitor is doing the job these days without all the hassle.

 

If you consider 4K monitor, then you might actually be able to pull off a laptop! It will be a beefy laptop, like an Asus RoC gaming laptop. But you can get business workstation-class laptops too. The mechanical engineers at my work have these for running SolidWorks, Maya, and other such graphics apps.

 

For the CPU I would research your video editing software first. I don't know if video editing and transcoding are CPU intensive or if the software uses the GPU for such tasks? Also, if your software can use it, you might want to look into getting a CUDA-core to speed things up.

 

SSD for your primary OS drive, spinning disks for the bulk storage (video files and such).

 

When I build systems (not very often anymore), I would always buy from NewEgg. These days I would probably also price compare with Amazon since I get free shipping with Prime.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a Mac Pro Tower as it does it all.

Ubuntu 750 Gig SATA drive

Mac OS X (El Capitan) 1 TB SATA drive

Window 7 1 TB SATA drive

Windows 10 500 Gig SATA drive

And a backup 1 TB SATA drive with partition for Document storage too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a base line - My computer is several years old and meets your requirements (not it's no for sale).

 

My 4GB GTX 770 is aged so go for something newer - I also have to use 2 adaptors to connect everything as the ports are 2xDVI, one HDMI and one displayport.

 

My PSU isn't listed but it's a 1kwatt evga.

 

The monitors are interchangeable to what you'd want. i actually use a 42" kiosk as my main screen, A TV, a Cintiq (for artwork) and the HP is turned 90 degrees for better page reading.

 
Summary
 
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
 
CPU
AMD FX-8350 34 °C
Vishera 32nm Technology
 
RAM
32.0GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 803MHz (9-9-9-26)
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co. Ltd. 990FXA-UD5 (CPU 1) 28 °C
 
Graphics
42MDT1-A2D (1920x1080@60Hz)
HP L1750 (1024x1280@60Hz)
ZORAN (1920x1080@30Hz)
Cintiq 12WX (1280x800@59Hz)
4095MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (EVGA) 37 °C
 
Storage
465GB Samsung SSD 840 Series SATA Disk Device (SSD) 31 °C
465GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500G SATA Disk Device (SSD) 27 °C
465GB Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500G SATA Disk Device (SSD) 29 °C
465GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 500G SATA Disk Device (SSD) 29 °C
 
Optical Drives
ATAPI iHAS220 6 SATA CdRom Device
 
Audio
Realtek High Definition Audio
 
Operating System
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Computer type: Desktop
 
I use it for everything from music creation to game development to video editing etc...
Edited by Sinphaltimus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refreshed after Christmas 2016 ...

 

Gigabyte GA-H170 Mainboard

Intel Corei7-6700K 4 GHz

Samsung 500 GiB SSD

Sapphire Radeon RX480

Kingston 16 GiB DDR4-2133

 

+ older 128 GiB SSD for VirtualBox drives

+ older 1 TB hard drive (magn)

 

The CPU brought an enormous boost, compared to my previous system (Corei7-3820).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not liking these "combo" microphone/earphone jacks I'm see on a lot of these computers...

 

For example << THIS COMPUTER >> even has one. I've never really been a fan of all-in ones, but am considering it...

Also never buy all in ones as you have more failures by average and if you have one component fail your whole pc is down

 

Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say a 486DX4-100 with 48megs of RAM, Sound Blaster 16 card and Diamond Stealth SVGA VLB card with a beefy 320meg hard drive and 4x speed CDROM drive. Round it off with a nice 17" CRT monitor. Wait, this is not 1995, is it????

That's almost exactly my first PC spec, except I have a MASSIVE 850Mb hard drive :P

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

64 GiB RAM is gigantic, and I have some doubts that it can ever be reasonably filled with a desktop PC, even when you're doing video editing. My PC does not even fill its 16 GiB RAM.

 

Also, 2 TB is really big for the HD, again, depending on whether you keep your stuff on the HD or burn it to a Bluray. I'd rather go for a bigger SSD (512 GB).

 

The graphics card is from the second line; a faster choice would be GTX1080.

 

But I guess this will suffice for any application including running current games with 4K resolution.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

64 GiB RAM is gigantic, and I have some doubts that it can ever be reasonably filled with a desktop PC, even when you're doing video editing. My PC does not even fill its 16 GiB RAM.

 

Also, 2 TB is really big for the HD, again, depending on whether you keep your stuff on the HD or burn it to a Bluray. I'd rather go for a bigger SSD (512 GB).

 

The graphics card is from the second line; a faster choice would be GTX1080.

 

But I guess this will suffice for any application including running current games with 4K resolution.

 

You make some good points there, thank you. I suppose it will also save me some money. I guess I can cut the RAM down to a more reasonable 16GB. I currently have 8GB on my current system, but that does not appear to be enough and I cannot extend it further.

 

Yeah, on the HD I have a 3TB WD as a backup, and only keep about 250GB on my primary drive at one time, so yes that would be overkill.

 

With the money I save on the PC side, I can put towards a larger 4K monitor.

 

I'm hoping the setup I end up with will have a serviceable life of at least 5 years.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16GB was not enough for me on my last PC as I often let multiple large jobs run in the background while I do other things - it depends on how you use your system. When I upped it to 24GB I was finally happy, my current machine has 32GB. Likewise, a packrat nature combined with the desire that everything always be instantly available to me, I found 2TB not quite big enough for my use.

 

BUT! Upgrading RAM and upgrading HDD are both things that get cheaper all the time, so as long as you leave yourself some room, I wouldn't worry about it. ;) Since you're coming from 8GB RAM and very little on your main drive, doubling both will keep you happy for a good while! ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

...

With the money I save on the PC side, I can put towards a larger 4K monitor.

 

I'm hoping the setup I end up with will have a serviceable life of at least 5 years.

 

You just *can't* spend a lot on a monitor any more. I got my 4K about 2-years ago for something like $450 I think, if that. Hell, I spent $750 *each* for 19" LCD monitors back in 2003 when I was going from CRT to flat screen. There are two things I'm willing to spend money on to get a better product, monitors and printers, but these days you just can't get a quality computer product by spending more money. It seems low price is the only factor these days, and products are so cheap and crappy. :-( Makes me sad and want to program my 99/4A. :-)

 

A system like that will easily give you service for 5 years. Computers are not getting any faster, and have not for about 10 years. We hit a speed limit of about 3.5GHz to 4GHz back in the early 2000's, and that's when things started going "wider" (think more cores, etc.). But for typical desktop use, a 3GHz computer from 5 years ago is just a good as a 3GHz computer today, and that will be just as good (or bad depending on how the future goes) as a 3GHz computer in 5 years. IMO.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But for typical desktop use, a 3GHz computer from 5 years ago is just a good as a 3GHz computer today, and that will be just as good (or bad depending on how the future goes) as a 3GHz computer in 5 years. IMO.

 

As I said above, my impression is different. Although there are only few visible changes, the switch from Core i7-3820 ("Sandy Bridge", 3.6 GHz) to Core i7-6700K ("Skylake", 4 GHz) gave a significant boost. When I run "mame64 ti99_8 -bench 10" for measuring performance, I get a 200% for the first, but a 350% for the second - and MAME is largely single-threaded. Other things like compiling time are harder to compare because the storage device plays an important role, as does the graphics card for video/image editing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just *can't* spend a lot on a monitor any more. I got my 4K about 2-years ago for something like $450 I think, if that. Hell, I spent $750 *each* for 19" LCD monitors back in 2003 when I was going from CRT to flat screen. There are two things I'm willing to spend money on to get a better product, monitors and printers, but these days you just can't get a quality computer product by spending more money. It seems low price is the only factor these days, and products are so cheap and crappy. :-( Makes me sad and want to program my 99/4A. :-)

 

Oh sure you can, build your own. There's no shortage of premium parts like sound cards that control lighting strips. Memory modules with LEDs on them. Or liquid-cooled M2 drives.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...