Adrian M Posted December 10, 2001 Share Posted December 10, 2001 I agree. The Atari version is great, but just like the NES version of Double Dragon, too much of the arcade feel is lost. Another thing that makes the game annoyingly difficult is how easy it is to accidentally detonate your flash bombs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moycon Posted December 10, 2001 Share Posted December 10, 2001 Yes I agree it loses alot in the translation. But I always liked it. There were alot of games around that time that only had one screen...Tutankamen had 4 and they scrolled!!! It does get a tad hard quick tho! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Posted December 10, 2001 Share Posted December 10, 2001 Never having played the arcade version when I was younger I thought Tutankham was great. It really doesn't resemble the arcade game at all, but it's a great game on it's own. The manual really adds alot to the game giving background on all the treasures. I've made it through the whole game collecting all the treasures on 1 life. Tempest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanJr Posted December 11, 2001 Share Posted December 11, 2001 Tutankham is gold, baby! I love it. It does get hard fast, but I still love it. It is excellent! Stan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memorymoog Posted December 11, 2001 Author Share Posted December 11, 2001 Whats with this game? ive heard conflicting reviews? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemmi Posted December 11, 2001 Share Posted December 11, 2001 i love this game , my first experience with this game was on the colecovision which i played it to death , then i found a copy for the 2600 about 10 years later and when i played it i went out and got a Colecovision of my own and tutankham but i think both versions are good for there systems and i would give it a Gold Star Edit I hope this makes sence cause it sounds like i am rambleing and i dont feel like fixing it my point, i love this game but i love the colecovision version better [ 12-10-2001: Message edited by: Lemmi ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fretwobbler Posted December 11, 2001 Share Posted December 11, 2001 For a contradicting view I think its a pain - I dont like the way your bloke can't stand still, infuriates me. But dont let me put you off buying the game, you may love it , one mans Atari game is another mans poisen Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian M Posted December 11, 2001 Share Posted December 11, 2001 Good game, but INCREDIBLY difficult! Make sure you have a good joystick or better yet, a new Genesis pad with a crisp D-pad since you're often faced with situations where lightning quick reflexes are required. Those damn bats can be tough! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ze_ro Posted December 11, 2001 Share Posted December 11, 2001 I loved the arcade version, but I think the 2600 version loses a lot in the translation. If you have a ColecoVision though, it has a better version of the game. The Atari version is still pretty good though, and is worth picking up. --Zero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.