Jump to content
  • entries
    4,944
  • comments
    2,718
  • views
    1,808,382

Windows Media Player is stupid


atari2600land

606 views

So I finished the second song (MIDI) on my album and converted it to an MP3. But when I went to add it into Windows Media Player, it said it was 27:05. I was like "What?" All the other Windows programs that play music said it was around 27 minutes as well. So I went and started up Nero. It said a more sane time: 26:25. Which is what the MIDI program I programmed the music in said it was.

Why is Windows Media Player then saying it's 27:05 when it's actually 26:25? I've had discrepencies in music length with WMP before, so it's not like this is a fairly new thing, but 40 seconds' difference seems like a long time to be off by.

And with song #2 done, all I have to do is begin and make a third song. Song #2 is called "Music To Clip Your Toenails By". But if it takes you 26 minutes to clip your toenails, there's something wrong there. I don't know, I just thought to myself "There's no music to play when you clip your toenails. There's music to play at Christmas time, but none at toenail clipping time." So I rectified that situation.

Song #3 will be called "Lemons in August." I hoped to have this done by November, but I kept on not working on it, so I pushed it back to December. And since I work on like about a minute per day, that seems like mid-November is about right, Unless I don't work on it every day.

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

Are you encoding MP3 with a fixed or variable bitrate? If you're using variable, programs like WMP and others won't be able to know for certain how long your song is until it has finished playing. I don't think the MP3 format has a field for storing total length. If you encode with fixed bitrate - e.g. 128 kbit/s if you are sampling a sound card - you should get consistent results.

Link to comment

Ok, it seems that "default" is a fixed bitrate of 128 kbit/s so it would eliminate that option. How about shorter songs, do you get consistent results with those so only really long ones will differentiate a little?

 

(Besides, I've never been close to a 26 minute composition - kudos to you!)

Link to comment

A long time ago, I converted a YouTube video of Frank Zappa's "Billy the Mountain" to MP3. It was more than a few minutes off, so I think the shorter the song, the more correct it is.

Link to comment

What MIDI program are you using? I'm surprised it doesn't have an "export" function for MP3s.

 

Also, it could be that the conversion program slowed down the tempo a little bit, stretching the song slightly. I suppose even a fraction variance would add up after 26 minutes, so the extra 40 seconds may be just that.

Link to comment

But if he loaded the generated MP3 into Nero (which burns CD-R for reference) and it displayed the same playing time as the MIDI file had, it probably is something else that makes the other music playing softwares to display a longer playing time.

 

What you could do if you doubt the online converter and have a fairly good sound card in your PC (or software synth) is to use a program like Audacity and record playback from the MIDI software, the "What you hear" input option. Remember to close down email clients, web browsers and other software that could cause system beeps and plongs while the music plays. You also need the LAME MP3 encoding library installed so Audacity can generate MP3. A bit cumbersome perhaps compared to making an online conversion, but better odds you have control over the entire process.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...