Jump to content
  • entries
    259
  • comments
    667
  • views
    50,570

Strawberry Shortcake: Musical Match-ups (Parker Brothers)

DoctorSpuds

100 views

blog-0960259001557979660.png

Kid’s games are exceptionally difficult to make, which is why so many of them are terrible. Many companies vie for the tried and true method of making a few cookie cutter minigames and plastering a well-known children’s character/icon on it. Some companies like Humungous Entertainment and Disney found ways to make kid’s games that kid’s will actually enjoy playing; they’re complex without being too difficult  and not too easy to the point of being condescending. Unfortunately this is 1983 and we’re stuck with whatever Spinnaker is releasing on the Commodore systems and a few sporadic releases on the current consoles like the Electric Company: Word/Math Fun and a few Coleco releases based on the Cabbage Patch Kids and Smurfs (I’m sure there are more on home computers but I only know of these few on console). Enter Parker Brothers who released a slew of licensed games between 1982 and 1984, but all of these were for the most part based on characters and products aimed at boys or were at the very least marketed to kids in general, but what about the girls? Well the girls got what is probably Parker Brothers’ worst released game, Strawberry Shortcake Musical Matchups, holy crap this game… Let’s begin where we always do, the graphics.
 
blogentry-62222-0-15231300-1557979619_thumb.png
I’ll be honest here, the graphics are actually incredible, the spritework done is absolutely top notch. All five characters are colorful and complex to the point of actually looking like the character they’re meant to represent which is good frankly astounding for the 2600. The strange trellis gazebo thing they’re standing under is a bit odd looking, it resembles an extremely tall pink cupcake, or something I’d rather not talk about with kids nearby, the detail work is good and is passable as a whole. The background is okay the sky is blue and the sun is happy, the only other thing of note is the decent text they managed to get, it’s not often that you get legible writing on the 2600.
blogentry-62222-0-93007300-1557979622_thumb.png
It may seem odd but I think more care was placed into the music that was into either the graphics or gameplay. Each character has a decently long harmonized tune that plays when they are matched, more on that later, each song is split up into three different parts, more on that later again. Some of the music is excellent with different instrumentation for each song giving each it’s own feel to fit in with its respective character, the rest is a series of high pitch squeals that rends all the flesh from your ears. My personal favorite tune is the Purple Pieman’s because it is the catchiest and is far different from the rest. And now for the gameplay…
blogentry-62222-0-20641500-1557979627_thumb.png
Um… Where is it? I can’t seem to find any… This is a matching game where you put together three different parts of a character, head, torso, and legs. Upon matching all three parts and pressing the button you’ll hear the character’s complete song. If you don’t match the character parts but press the button anyway you’ll be treated to a messed up mish-mash of garbage, which would be an apt description of the game coincidentally. The manual for this game, which is a whopping four pages, is filled with the different game variations which simply add more things to match and a time limit. In one variation you have to match a character to the name displayed at the bottom and in another it’s the same thing but with a time limit, another is the same thing but with a faster time limit. I believe the final two variations have you matching the character and name to the song played at the beginning which is a bit more difficult but nowhere near engaging.
blogentry-62222-0-30376500-1557979631_thumb.png
This game is boring, this game is repetitive, and worst of all its condescending. “Here kids, match these same five things for an hour, and do it again tomorrow too”, a game like this would be ideal for ages 1-4 not 4-7 like the box says, I know Strawberry Shortcake was big back in the 80’s but this just wasn’t the way to go about making a game about it. Actually it would have been better if they’d copied what Coleco was doing and make a basic Pitfall! Style platforming game but with Strawberry Shortcake characters, not a matching game. If you want to buy this game (for some reason) it’ll cost you around 12 dollars for a loose cart and anywhere from 20-80 dollars for a boxed copy, I got ‘lucky’ and got mine boxed off Etsy for 15 dollars. If you have any self respect then don’t buy this game, it’s just stupid and rightfully goes to the Collector’s Zone.



5 Comments


Recommended Comments

They used a neat trick to pull off the character graphics. They set player0 to 2 copies close then lined up the players as:

010

 

which results in a 24 pixel wide character. The graphics and colors for each player are set at the start of each scanline. Then while player1 is draw the Reflect Flag for player0 is turned on - this makes the left and right side of the character a mirror image, and always the same color. The middle 8 pixels can be a different color, and since they're not flipped the middle allows for the off-centered hat decorations seen for Blueberry Muffin and Huckleberry Pie.

Share this comment


Link to comment

They used a neat trick to pull off the character graphics. They set player0 to 2 copies close then lined up the players as:

 

010

 

which results in a 24 pixel wide character. The graphics and colors for each player are set at the start of each scanline. Then while player1 is draw the Reflect Flag for player0 is turned on - this makes the left and right side of the character a mirror image, and always the same color. The middle 8 pixels can be a different color, and since they're not flipped the middle allows for the off-centered hat decorations seen for Blueberry Muffin and Huckleberry Pie.

 

Clever, clever. It's too bad they put all of this effort in for this particular game.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I love the variation in this blog. In four days time you've gone from an awful adult game to a dull childrens game.

Share this comment


Link to comment

I love the variation in this blog. In four days time you've gone from an awful adult game to a dull childrens game.

 

I can't let the blog get stale, there are so many more games than what Atari and Activision released, ya gotta get in there and pull out the real winners, not just the easy pickings. Who knows maybe I'll inspire a few people to leave their comfort zone and explore this weird old console's full library, warts and all.

Share this comment


Link to comment

This game ... oOoOO .... This game. I think it's meant for kids age 0-1 (and only because it's colorful, noisy and slightly interactive). My kids had no interest in it whatsoever. I thought "santa" would give it to my younger daughter (age 2) for a goof in her stocking. On game night, both my kids looked at it with a perfect WTF stare.

 

Ok ok, I'm guilty of leaning towards the 80's for flavor with my kids toys, but I'm not crazy enough to artificially recreate an entire American Greetings chronological media phenomenon aimed at my children. Even if I had, I doubt the game would have much more of an attraction for them, since I think part of it requires seeing the dolls around town, on TV and at other kid's houses. To enjoy this without snearing at it, I think they'd have to be familiar if not obsessed with the characters (which I observed in my sister during the actual time period).

 

 

Anyway, yeah, I think this "game" is a relic at best. Having grown up next to my sister and actually knowing who Lime Chiffon was, it still didn't hold my attention for longer than 2 minutes. My kids were even less interested, and wanted to go back to something fun like Ladybug, or something more genuinely awesome, like Astal for the Saturn.

 

 

I suppose if one happens to be the kind of person who collects Strawberry Shortcake dolls, it would be amusing to see a larger one in a display case holding this cartidge and a joystick. Other than that, there's not much use for this title outside of irony.

 

 

The Trashheap Has Spoken.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...