The Legality of ROMs
It took me freakin' an hour to find it, but after going through tons of pop-ups and stupid hacks, I found it. The ROM to Super Mario Bros. for the NES. It shouldn't have to be that hard. Sure, you can find Atari 2600 ROMS left and right, but why is it so freakin' illegal to get a ROM of a 25-year-old game, and yet have Lynx ROMS on AtariAge? And man, these popups were misleading. They said "Click Cancel to apply for a free gift." OK, I hate the ESA. They are enforcing stupid rules. Rules that need to be broken. It's freakin' 25 years old! You can buy it used and then rip a new ROM if you felt like it and had the tools necessary. Is that illegal, too? I have learned that most video game companies are stupid and just care about a quick $40. That's what I like about Atari: Just about every company under the sun made 2600 games. Atari hated it, but the companies kept doing it anyway, there were just too many for Atari to keep up with. I want to play Super Mario Bros. on my computer. Why is that illegal? If that's illegal, then so is playing it on my NES, no? Of course not, that's silly. Of course, Nintendo is the only company still making gaming consoles that did 25 years ago. Gone are the days of Sega and Atari. So what if it's property of Nintendo? I doubt the president of NOA would actually really CARE if I played SMB on my computer. I doubt the government would really care, either. Message to Nintendo: Let your games die in peace so we can EASILY download them without going through the legality bulls***!

3 Comments
Recommended Comments