Jump to content

Serguei2

Members
  • Content Count

    2,282
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Serguei2


  1. **This thread was not inspired by Jackandsig's CreatiVision thread(I though of his after) but would not mine if he posted on this one :)**

    Alot of people hate on the Game.com because "the only good games are the puzzle/trivia/board games" as the action games are slow and unplayable and although I like the system(out of all the Videogame consoles/handhelds ever made I only dislike the R-zone as I hate LCD games) I can agree.Now I have noticed that on the Game.com emulator(Gcom), the games are much better than on the actual console(not great but tolerable)as there is no slowdown or ghosting effect so that means that it's the Game.com's screen that makes it bad not the console's hardware.So I just wanted to know how powerful was the Game.com compared to the Gameboy color,was it much better or much worse as the unreleased Metal Gear Solid port looks better graphically than the Gameboy Color port.

     

    Wait. If Game.com has better resolution than a gameboy color, why this screenshot is smaller than gbc?


  2. 10 pages and still no firm decision? Come on guys, I wanna know whether to build an NES shrine or not.

     

    Well. Based on the result of the poll. Nintendo didn't saving gaming.

     

    It would mean if Nintendo didn't release NES, we would stuck with 2600, Intellivision and ColecoVision.

    Or maybe we would buy a computer if we want to play games.


  3. Or use a SMS gamepad like I did once, it's great for games where you move in eight directions.

     

    And yes I remember hearing about the 2600 clone with 128 games sold to the Arabian market...

     

    It would be a great start to buy an 2600 with 128 free games in cartridges.


  4. If Nintendo didn't save video games,, it surely introduced new features in video games like:

     

    1 - Write passwords to reach a level : I don't remembered any consoles before Nintendo using passwords.

     

    2 - Battery backup. Now you can save your games and play them later.

     

    3 - Longer gameplay: you can't finish a game with only one sitting.

     

    4 - The gamepads ... Much better than joysticks.


  5. I think the "game port" is just the cartridge port, nothing fancy about that

     

    And those controllers were later shipped with 7800 units in Europe.

     

    I have a bunch of them. And you can still get them from Best and elsewhere

     

    At the end they were probably mixing and matching to get rid of inventory

     

    Atari 7800 has gamepads too?

     

    The last time I saw an 7800 in the stores were joysticks.

     

    post-1196-0-60293500-1387133683_thumb.jpg


  6. I have been through a couple of sites the last through days announcing the "top" consoles of all time. With most of them having the NES on the top but the reasons for it and the 2600 being 2nd or lower (in some sites last out of 50) that have me scratching my head.

     

    On the 2600 side many say:

     

    1. The Atari 2600 by itself(atari) took the industry to the brink of destruction. Some sites saying it drove a stake through the industry.
    2. Acting like consoles in the present have quality control for games, and almost put the entirety of the blame on it, even saying that once Activision and etc came out, Atari was making noo good games for pretty much all the 80's.
    3. Atari 2600 games are too simple and lack in depth imagination
    4. Atari 2600 was not a world wide success

     

     

    On the NES side many say:

     

    1. Nintendo fixed the Industry that Atari had ruined.
    2. Video games were completely dead until the NES released in 1985 and brought the industry back by 1986
    3. SMB single-handedly changed the types of games we played and also inspired PC gaming somehow and games with scrolling
    4. NES was the first left hand to move console
    5. NES was the first to also become a computer
    6. NES was the first to have lock-out options
    7. NES single-handedly brought video game consoles back into existence, and without them there would be no consoles.
    8. People were not still buying video games until the NES
    9. The NES test launch was responsible for the new intellivisions, the Atari 7800, and for the Atari 2600 jr. As well as Coleco still supporting CV in 1085.
    10. NES setting up the third-party game publisher system as we know it

     

     

    NOW keep in mind. These are from tons of mainstream "gaming sites" that claim to know the history. All of these are on at least 5 of them so it's not like these are from some isolated site. This is what the average guy will read if he starts to try and get into the history of games.

     

    The whole thread is about video games. Not computer games or arcade games.

     

    In the video games market in 1987, I agree with this list.

     

    There are shops where they rent Nintendo and Sega games and consoles.

     

    I never saw renting Atari 2600 games.


  7. I first thought the 2ds looks like 3ds but without 3d option.

     

    I don't like the 2ds design.

     

    I don't own a 3ds anyway because modern video games/handhelds requiert update before playing.


  8. I'm sure some guy with a smart phone or a news crew will get something on video before the official documentary is released.

     

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nm74NOaOL64

     

    It's the same video I watched few days ago.

     

    It doesn't bring anything news.

     

    Fuel Industries lets the reporters entering the site and taking shots for the tv news.

     

    I don't think they left everybody taking shots with smartphones.

     

    Or it will ruin theiir documentaries.


  9. I'm looking for the name of the arcade machine.

     

     

    post-1196-0-16679100-1373760700_thumb.png

     

    It's about a clown collecting balloons before they reach the ground on the cycle.

     

    The picture is not from the arcade. Just to show an idea I'm talking about.


  10. I don't really understand why they would want to do this. It's not like they are excavating dinosaur bones or ancient ruins, it's crushed multimedia from the 1980s. It just seems like a massive waste of money and resources.

     

    They will make a documentary film and make money with it.

×
×
  • Create New...