Jump to content

Math You

Members
  • Content Count

    872
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Math You


  1. I still don't think they (suits) have any idea what they (should) have been doing with Atari
    True. It would make more sense for Infogrames to use their own name on PC and console software and save the Atari name for retro products.

     

    The Atari name has such a powerful '1980's' image that using it with modern software just doesn't seem appropriate.


  2. But I have a feeling that this Atari company is about at an end, like the rest, and the Atari name, at best, will be shuffled around again for a while.
    It looks that way. What Atari needs is a new owner who has a real sense of pride about how great Atari once was and how great it could be again. Legacy Engineering would be an excellent candidate.

  3. It seems that some people don't think a Jag flashback would sell
    I think that all of the newer Atari hardware whether it's a Jag, Lynx or ST would be difficult to sell as they don't really have the same feeling of nostaligia that the older consoles had.

     

    I know I've mentioned this before, but a built in DVD player is one way of selling the Jaguar. If kids want a DVD player for their bedroom then why not buy a Jag so they can play games aswell? It might even be possible to play Blu-ray discs using the right software.

     

    A built in modem for online games and surfing the internet might appeal to people who want the internet on their TV's.


  4. I think a faster version of the Jaguar (1.3295gHz!!) would be a good, especially if it had a DVD or Blu-Ray player that allowed dvd graphics and the Jags own graphics to be displayed at the same time. Some people might buy it just for the DVD/Blu-Ray player.


  5. I owned a 520STFM and my first game was International Karate. A friend of mine had an Amiga 500 and liked to talk about its superiority. The strange thing was that I used to like the Amiga aswell but his constant bragging and arrogance kind of put me off it.

     

    Something that surprises me is why Atari never gave the first generation ST's better graphics or sound. They knew what the Amiga was going to be because Atari paid for it's development, but instead of creating something better, say 64 on-screen colours and 8 channel sound, they chose to make something slightly inferior.

     

    It's rare for a manufacturer such as Atari to have this kind of inside information about a competitors product. Failing to make something better was a hugh mistake.


  6. I know alot of you are also interested in Ataris computer side also, so theres still a lot of different ways Atari can go along with this.
    I've always liked the idea of a 5200/800 that was a similar size and style as a Nintendo DS except it would have a keyboard instead of a second screen.

    post-12382-1197385008_thumb.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...