-
Content Count
28 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by the80sgamer
-
-
Who wants to bet the local radio stations give away tickets to this? I think the attendance is going to be so low they start begging people on the street to come check it out!
-
2
-
-
The dealer spaces map seems to be back up again and it shows a miraculous growth in the number of dealer spaces sold in just the few short weeks since it was shown that only 4 spots were gone. My guess is to expect there to be 10 Castle Windows booths each hosted by one the new "Coleco" employees......
Funny how the layout changed. Maybe they got a smaller space? If the "sold out" spots are false I expect this to be cancelled. If they are not, I expect the entire fiasco to be a huge flop!
-
2
-
-
I will never support this iteration of Coleco! If someone else revives the name after Cardildo loses it then I'll rethink that. I'd rather go direct to the homebrewers for things I like.
-
2
-
-
Looking at their "team" I'm guessing most of them were somehow involved with his stupid music videos.
-
Hmmm ... Threads at 69, eat that Coleco Holdings...
And currently over at that new Coleco....

-
2
-
-

Hey look! It's the expo!
They couldn't even get the name spelled correctly!
-
9
-
-
That being said, those are my own personal feelings and I get that other people will feel differently. The humor is welcome, but all I ask is that maybe we try not to take it THAT far? Is this too much to ask? (Serious question, not being sarcastic!)

I would agree. Keep the humor in good taste so as not to stir any trouble.
-
3
-
-
Start a new thread for the humor. I'm sure it'll get seen by all!
-
2
-
-
And to think most of the community gave RWB the benefit of the doubt when they got involved with the Chameleon.. But this thread ruined any good perception the retro community had of them.
This thread didn't ruin their reputation, they did. This thread exposed them for what they are!
-
11
-
-
That why its a amendment to the filing, as they don't believe the original filling was totally accurate
Technically it was 2003, just that they have to show proof that they were in commence with the mark, usually around 3 years after filling
The 2003 date is in the new filing for the color logo. The amendment also applies to the new filing not the original for the name. Plus, I don't think they can prove use, by them as early as 2003. Just saying. Grabbing photos off the net should not be taken as proof and they certainly didn't have any products.
-
2
-
-
Only way is challenge really anything is by a lawyer going though USPTO public challenge
Really at this date you could only really argue it was done either though serious fraud
or that Coleco really isn't doing commerce with the marks currently
Only reason they would want to push it back is that they could possible sue Newcoleco and others with a earlier date
Doesn't their own trademark filing for the word "colecovision" work against them in that they filed for it in 2003, extended it several times and then were granted it in 2008 based on Ben Hecks photo stating first use in December 2005? Saying the color logo was used in 2003 when none of their other claims ever used a date that early?
I just hate the idea that they can cheat, lie and steal to get the trademark assigned to them and then proceed to destroy it the way they are. I'd contribute to a GoFundMe if anyone is willing to fight this.
-
5
-
-
Also, as for the color logo, this will open to be contested some time after review and I'm sure it could be shown that it was clearly in use by others prior to their claim of 2003 to get them rejected.
-
I wonder what mechanism the USTO has to challenge a filing like that?
http://info.legalzoom.com/contest-trademark-filing-22517.html
CancellationIf the trademark registration that you want to contest has already issued, you can file a cancellation proceeding within five years from the date of registration. There are several grounds for filing a cancellation proceeding. Any person who believes that the registration will damage him may file a petition to cancel the registration. The trademark registration at issue can also be cancelled if the mark becomes a generic name, if the mark is functional, if its owner has abandoned the mark or if the owner obtained the registration through fraudulent means.
Ok, someone with more valid claims to the ColecoVision name and logo need to pursue contesting the trademark filing and the new amendment. Under the amendment filing it states the following text:
DECLARATION: The signatory being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or submission or any registration resulting therefrom, declares that, if the applicant submitted the application or allegation of use (AOU) unsigned, all statements in the application or AOU and this submission based on the signatory's own knowledge are true, and all statements in the application or AOU and this submission made on information and belief are believed to be true.
It looks like this sham of a company is stating dates of use from their first year of filing which is clearly provable that they did not have a product using the name. That is definitely a false statement. And the now known fact they obtained registration through fraudulent means should be able to get the registration cancelled. Whomever has been using the name and logo since before 2003 should look into they process to request cancellation. Even if all the homebrewers need to form a consortium and file together.
-
8
-
-
Exactly which "platforms" do they have that they encourage development for? They don't own any!
-
Somehow I must have butthurt that turd as I can no longer respond to posts on his sorry facebook page.
And deleted all my posts! Poor baby can't handle the truth so he deletes it.
-
2
-
-
Someone has to go, even if it's just to take YouTube video in the event a mass protest, possible heckling, or just to be there to document any lies, distortions or omissions.
*** EDIT ***
And maybe to ask some pointed questions about how they are treating the homebrew community. If anything it might be news to some attendees.
Based on some of the posts on their FB page I'm thinking there are some that are clueless to how the community has been treated.
-
1
-
-
I have wondered if Coleco Holdings could even hold claim to "Colecovision" due to the fact that so many homebrew products were using the name prior to them co-opting it. It would be very interesting to know what a court would say about the matter.
-
1
-
-
This is a very interesting read: http://nerdlypleasures.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-ownership-of-and-issues-with.html
Very interesting indeed.
-
Looks like Cardildo is on a bender replying to posts on his lousy trademark facebook page.
-
I stumbled across this retro gaming convention called the Classic Game Fest in Austin Texas. I didn't know this existed. I'm pretty sure this has to be way better than whatever Cardildo put together. Here is a link to their facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/ClassicGameFest/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED&fref=nf
The website is here: http://classicgamefest.com/
-
1
-
-
I'm sure Coleco has a license with Hallmark for the game given it states "officially licensed" right in the announcement on Facebook. Probably just a mistake on Hallmark's part. I would not read much into it
..Al
Actually, they were stupid enough to link to an episode someone put on youtube and Hallmark must have complained to youtube about the content posted there. This complaint would not have been against you know who but against whomever posted it to youtube.
-
1
-
-
They'll get there eventually, they have resources the community does not.
No they won't. They really don't have the resources otherwise they wouldn't look for homebrewers to do all the work for free and then give them a cut of the profits after any sales. Why do that when any homebrewer can make the games anyway and keep all the profits?
-
Just like the patent trolls.
-
2
-
-
Well if that isn't a clear example of shady business practices I don't know what is!
-
3
-

Coleco strong-arming homebrew publishers and fan sites
in ColecoVision / Adam
Posted
Interesting...things like this is a violation of Ebay rules.