Vic George 2K3

There's only one answer if you want a true sequel to your favorite games that the leading game companies aren't giving you... CREATE IT YOURSELF!!!

I was into wanting to develop board game versions of video games. One of them I did was for Galaxian.

Well, unless BioWare can even bother to make retro fixes on DAO to make placing characters wherever I want in combat like people can with the computer version possible on the console version, or have potions be available as a clickable icon at the bottom of the screen without me having to drag it there from the inventory screen on the computer version, or scale the difficulty of both versions so that they're even with each other, it'll be hard for me to want to pick up DAO again to try finishing it.

I hardly found Dragon Age II deserving of shameful, though it certainly didn't live up to the epicness of Dragon Age: Origins. However, Dragon Age: Origins does leave me wanting of the features that Dragon Age II had on both consoles and computer.

I'd go for Pac-Man.

USE ACCURATE GRAMMAR!!! "And Atari IS moaning about copyright" Before anyone starts P&Ming about America being dumbed down, why not look to your own contribution to the problem?

Namco Arcade Museum and Pac-Man Collection.

Only for now, when their games aren't so wanting for a control stick.

If Apple is going to try drawing consumers away from the game-heavy systems like the 3DS and the upcoming PS Vita, they might as well include thumbsticks on their iPads.

Nothing short of a modern 5200 controller in the style of a Jaguar controller using an analog thumbstick will sell me.

At least Coleco offered an expansion module to play 2600 games on the ColecoVision right from the start. Atari ended up waiting a year or so before they did the same for their 5200. Which basically sounds like a bad strategy for Atari if they wanted 2600 owners to upgrade to the 5200. Bounce.

At least Coleco offered an expansion module to play 2600 games on the ColecoVision right from the start. Atari ended up waiting a year or so before they did the same for their 5200. Which basically sounds like a bad strategy for Atari if they wanted 2600 owners to upgrade to the 5200, and the reason Atari decided to scrap the 5200 and work on the 7800.

THE BOX DESIGN!!! IT'S GIVING ME NIGHTMARES WITH ITS GENERICNESS!!!

Then their gripe should be aimed at the game journalists.

AAAAAH...KILL IT WITH FIRE!!!

A 3-in-1 2600/INTV/CV system? Sounds interesting. Just wondering what the controls for it would be like. ColecoVision controller style? Atari Jaguar style, probably replacing the D-pad with a thumbstick?

The upcoming homebrew game Armageddon may be the closest thing we'll have to ColecoVision Missile Command.

I'd equate the Atari 2600 as being the greatest of the Golden Age, and the NES as being the greatest of the Silver Age, if videogame system generations can be defined in mineral ages.

Pac-Man, Yars' Revenge, and Defender were all made in 1981, and were all released in 1982.

Yay, a Missile Command clone for the ColecoVision.

Made from the classic 1984 mockbuster.

Now a portable 5200? Will wonders never cease!

Well, maiki, if they're going to go the gamepad route, might as well have one that includes the paddle knobs or something to control the paddle controller games.

I just don't like having to swap out a Gamecube game disc for the Gameboy Player boot disc if I want to play a Gameboy, Gameboy Color, or Gameboy Advance game. It's only justifiable if you're NOT using the Gamecube to play Gamecube games.

Looks more like a copy of the original ColecoVision box. It doesn't even use the Intellivision packaging color scheme.