Jump to content

mizapf

Members
  • Content Count

    5,366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by mizapf


  1. 2 hours ago, MueThor said:

    Really? I didn't know that. So there exist programs, which run on consoles for NTSC, but don't run on consoles for PAL!? Of course there should occur as few as possible software problems utilizing the V9938 and/or V9958 minimal upgrade.

    No, I think this referred to some bits in the video registers of the TMS9918/28/29 (NTSC or PAL) that were unused, and which now have a meaning with the V9938.


  2. These are the contents of Tombstone City's GROM:

     

    6000: DATA  >AA,>01,>01,>00,>00,>00,>60,>10
    6008: DATA  >00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00
    6010: DATA  >00,>00,>60,>23,>0E
    6015: TEXT 'TOMBSTONE CITY'
    6023: DST   >0900,@>834A
    6027: CALL  [email protected]>0018
    602A: MOVE  >0010 BYTES FROM [email protected]>6077 TO [email protected]>0C80
    6031: MOVE  >0032 BYTES FROM [email protected]>6087 TO [email protected]>0AE0
    6038: MOVE  >0030 BYTES FROM [email protected]>60B7 TO [email protected]>0B40
    603F: MOVE  >0010 BYTES FROM [email protected]>60E7 TO [email protected]>0B80
    6046: MOVE  >00B8 BYTES FROM [email protected]>60F7 TO [email protected]>0BC0
    604D: MOVE  >0008 BYTES FROM [email protected]>61AF TO [email protected]>0CC0
    6054: MOVE  >0010 BYTES FROM [email protected]>6067 TO [email protected]>0384
    605B: BACK  >06
    605D: MOVE  >03CC BYTES FROM [email protected]>61B7 TO [email protected]>1002
    6065: XML   >70
    6067: DATA  >1B,>1B,>1B,>1B,>1B,>1B,>1B,>1B
    
    606F: DATA  >6B,>4B,>CB,>1B,>1B,>4B,>DB,>44
    6077: DATA  >00,>5A,>3C,>7E,>7E,>3C,>5A,>00
    607F: DATA  >00,>18,>FF,>7E,>7E,>FF,>18,>00
    
    ...
    
    6577: DATA  >01,>03,>8F,>38,>90,>03,>04,>9F
    657F: DATA  >BF,>DF,>FF,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00
    6587: DATA  >00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00
    
    ...
    
    77F7: DATA  >00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>00,>21
    77FF: DATA  >06

    • Like 1

  3. On 12/7/2020 at 10:53 AM, wietze said:

    Just opened her up, and it seems to have a TMS9929NL vdp chip.

    I currently connect the machine to the display using a `Texas Instruments TV PAL Encoder PHA 2030'. 

     

    Could the use of a PAL vdp chip cause the abovementioned graphical behaviour with some programs? 

    (Edit: some thread in this forum suggests that all cartridges encountered are PAL/NTSC compatible; so I assume answer is `no').

    How come there is a wrong VDP inside your console? The non-A variant should only be in the TI-99/4, I should have expected.

     

    • Like 3

  4. The REPL99 is from SNUG and delivers the GRMCLK line from the missing video processor. If you have a EVPC card with V9938, you have to remove the 9918/9929 VDP in the console. By this, you lose the GRMCLK as well, so your GROMs and sound stop working. The original way was to use a separate cable from the external EVPC card back to the console. The REPL99 goes into the open socket of the video processor.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1

  5. Interesting. The lower maria (especially the one above the Tycho crater) seem to be in front, while the edges are further back.

     

    (When I am wearing anaglyph glasses for more than a few seconds, the Auto White Balance in my brain seems to become shifted. 🙂 )

    • Like 1

  6. When you peek out of the window at night and are glad about "Homeoffice". (Yet another pseudo-anglizism in German; I guess you say "work from home" or WFH.)

     

    First snow here, right on time for December. It was not really expected after those warm November days (more than +10°C, I walked outside without a jacket.) I'm here at about 50°N latitude.

    Dez01.jpg

    • Like 5

  7. What I miss of my camera is a way to see the picture of the viewfinder on a laptop. I can connect the camera to a computer, but only to download pictures or movie clips. As of now, I have to squeeze myself between the telescope on its tripod and the edge of the roof hatch to watch the backside of the camera, while forming some bizarre figure with my body, almost defying gravity, but when it starts hurting, you know that your body does not agree with what the h*** you are doing there. Your fingertips are getting numb while temperature is crossing 0°C, and you desperately try to fiddle that screw back into its hole where you just unscrewed it some degrees too far. Welcome to amateur astronomy. ;-)

     

    Maybe some day I'll have a look at real astro cameras.

     


  8. Right, it was JPEG. I just meant to say this is the file as I got it from the camera, which was set to save as JPEG. The camera already does a good job with JPEG creation from RAW, better than all my attempts until now.

     

    The last picture is one of four that I stacked for the image in posting #3816.

     

    The focus issues can possibly indicate a problem with my mirror; my LX200 has some nasty mirror shift, a typical problem of SC-type telescopes (due to the mirror being pushed and pulled away from its center). I'll have an eye on that next time. One thing to do against that is to wander across the focus point and then turn back some amount so that the mirror becomes leveled again.

     

    Hobby astronomers may know that feeling: "Now is that sharper or not? Can't really tell." I used the magnifying function of my a58 for manual focusing (and I have a focus motor 🙂 ).

    • Like 2

  9. Sure, you can process the picture as you like. Maybe you'd better use an original picture without any processing from me, directly taken from the camera. Also, this is not stacked, but the stacking did not really improve the quality.

    DSC09898.JPG

    • Thanks 1

  10. So, this is better in terms of sharpness, but the terminator is almost gone on the left side; we have 99% full moon. I did apply some unsharp masking and enhanced the contrast, but the source images were already much better than the last ones.

     

    Fun fact: Each pixel of this image covers an area of 1.6 km x 1.6 km, or 1 mile x 1 mile. Just in case you expect to see the lunar landers somewhere.

    (the image of the Moon is 2460 pixels wide, the Moon diameter is 3474 km)

    mond1.jpg

    • Like 6
×
×
  • Create New...