Jump to content

JB

Members
  • Content Count

    9,516
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JB


  1. 11 hours ago, jedimatt42 said:

    Yep, vt100 compatibility with differentiating features must have be all the rage for a period in the terminal market.

    It seems more like the Linux community started using "vt100" to mean "terminal emulator" and forgot it referred to a specific piece of hardware at some point. So the DEC VT220 color codes are now part of the Linux vt100 software platform.


  2. 33 minutes ago, apersson850 said:

    It depends on how you want to define it. Usually, one phase of a four-phase clock is used to trig a certain part of the design, so that four different sections in the CPU do their part of the work in the correct order, within one main clock cycle.

    But if you look at each phase by itself, the frequency is still only 3 MHz, albeit with a duty cycle that's not 50%.

    What's definitely true is that the 9995 will accomplish more in the same time than a 9900 can do.

    Yeah, I do acknowledge that adding the clocks up would be a, umm, questionable thing to do. But you COULD do it!

    • Like 1

  3. 1 hour ago, vol said:

    We still don't have the proof for it.

    The datasheet is clear that there's a 1/4 divider in the chip.

    Granted, it does not explicitly say "and the processor runs at the divided clockerate", but they didn't include the divider for no reason(transistors cost money).

     

    Empirical evidence shows that, with a 12 MHz input clock, the 9995 performs slightly better than a 9900 with a 3 MHz clock input, which is what is expected for a slightly improved 9900 running at 12/4 MHz. It is also what is expected for a much much worse version of the 9900 running at 12/1 MHz, but it is difficult to imagine how iterative updates could result in a 4x loss of performance.

     

     

    I would say the onus is on you to prove the processor ISN'T clocked off of that divider, and it truly was included for no reason. And I look forward to your groundbreaking research in that regard.

    • Like 1

  4. They take different clock inputs, but both run at the same internal frequency.

    It is like a 486 DX2, only in reverse. A 486 DX2 66 takes a 33 MHz clock input and doubles it internally, but no one will argue it isn't a 66 MHz chip.

     

    Similarly, the 9995 takes a 12 MHz input and divides it by four internally. We can only speculate as to why, but it clearly doesn't "run at" 12 MHz.


  5. 2 hours ago, Stuart said:

    Unfortunately those terms will be meaningless to many users ...   ;-(

    Then rephrase it.

    "Is your TV a flickery mess? If yes, press P. If no, press N."

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2

  6. 20 hours ago, AtariNostalgia said:

    Was that the case in the 80s? How did they know which machines to strip? What I'm getting at is that I think most of the TMS9900's from China are clones.

    I don't have much experience from aliexpress only ebay. Can someone recommend a seller from Ali so I can get a couple of TMS9900 that I need?

    I believe even in the 80s they were harvesting gold from electronics. Dunno how bad the fake IC market was then. 

    But there's a lot of stuff that wasn't retired until much later, or was retired to a storage room and forgotten for a decade or two. Heck, there's probably STILL some businesses with an old 990 whirring away on some business-critical piece of COBOL. 

    • Like 3

  7. 13 hours ago, AtariNostalgia said:

    Does anyone know how so many TI chips ended up in China? There wasn't a market for the TI99 in the 80's there, and surely they're not buying damaged ones from ebay just for the chips. It's quiet puzzling.

    Probably because everyone ships their electronics over there for recycling. If it doesn't wind up in a landfill close to home, it goes to China to be recycled. They strip the metal from the PCBs, strip the ICs for resale, then the unsellable parts go in a landfill far from home.

    • Like 2

  8. You're not wrong. I remain amazed that for all it's vaunted audiovisual capabilities, the C64 provides no way to USE them other than PEEK'n'POKE, and people to this day think there's nothing wrong with that

    • Like 3

  9. On 2/10/2021 at 10:34 AM, HOME AUTOMATION said:

    Yes, 5 1/4" Floppy drives, were a nearly essential component in most plans for world domination in the mid '80s.:ponder:

     

    68JTiFO.thumb.jpg.3f1a4a6d4578f2b68a2a059449601396.jpg

     

    ...Today's expanded memory, makes it practical to keep tactical engagement and self-destruct routines loaded at all times.:grin:

     

         HA.

    We are Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. Insert disk two to commence assimilation.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 5

  10. It is most likely a power-saving optimization in the last Edge update. 

    I've noticed something similar on YouTube recently(if a video's been playing, but not visible, it stops rendering the video portion entirely until I click on it).


  11. On 1/17/2021 at 1:16 PM, Ksarul said:

    Back then, TI built most equipment to MIL SPEC. One of the tests it had to survive was a drop test. . .rumor back then was 3 feet (1 meter), but the test documentation I've seen said one foot.

    I'd be afraid to drop a P-Box three feet.

    Not that I might damage the P-Box, mind you. It'll be fine. I'm worried about whatever it lands on.

     

    • Haha 4
×
×
  • Create New...