Jump to content

analmux

Members
  • Content Count

    2,363
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

analmux last won the day on August 14 2014

analmux had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

236 Excellent

About analmux

  • Rank
    Stargunner

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

15,949 profile views
  1. OK, here's a new try. Two days ago I corrected some dissonants. ZybexRmab.xex
  2. @ phaeron Wow! I assume some kernel must be used. Could you clearly explain how it works? In a few sentences?
  3. @ Wrathchild What emkay means is you can play the 16-bit notes well, but RMT doesn't support any vibrato or portamento, that's all. A machine language bypass can be used to add vibrato and portamento as well. To check your FF3 tune I don't get it why you used 16-bit mode, but no 1.79 MHz mode. In fact the HSB values in voice 2 and 4 were put to zero. Normally voice 2 and 4 should be turned on. No, that's not correct. Sorry, but ''Overview Orchestra'' should already give much help. http://atariage.com/forums/topic/234769-rmt-patch-8/?p=3173080 http://atariage.com/forums/topic/234769-rmt-patch-8/?p=3172382 This shows that the FF3 song can be played with Patch 8 without any problem. You don't even need 16-bit notes. A single 8-bit version is possible already. You can use the full 9 octave scale. It is no problem if you just ask more detailed questions about Patch 8.
  4. I'm the judge here. This topic is about RMT Patch 8. Not about PoKey theory nor personal discussions. No, I suspect this nagging already started from makary's comments. He seems to be jealous when emkay's versions sound better. Just stop talking this way. Just let him go. We don't need to argue with him. OK, maybe it is true what you say, but the truth isn't much fun many times.
  5. It sounds amazing, but you still need to correct some dissonants.
  6. PoKey experts don't need any 'like' stamps. Just relax.
  7. Sorry. When will you correct the dissonants at the start?
  8. :rolling: .... thanks Stephen .... :rolling: Sorry makary, but we only tried to help you. To correctly using the more advanced PoKey possibilities you'll need to learn some mathematics. Emkay and I did already many experiments and trying to understand all PoKey positibilities. If you like to be a PoKey expert, then you need to work for it. Why can't you just accept this situation? But I'm not sure you like mathematics: http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1177583/quotient-spaces-so3-so2-and-so3-o2/1358628#1358628 Best regards, ANALogue MUltipleXer, MSc (Hons. Mult.) (Theoretical Physics & Mathematical Sciences)
  9. OK, sorry, it's a free translation from scratch.
  10. Maraky, just relax .... Emkay is an AA member for already 13 years. Most people know that emkay always makes an edit of an existing track, written by someone else. It was Always non provit. If you really don't like the title of his edits, then ask him to explicitly add the original composer's name.
  11. Good work emkay, but what's the real benefit of using 4*VBI speed instead of using 2*VBI speed w.r.t. this song, using only hardware instruments?
  12. Hi makary, Emkay (who is a PoKey test expert) made a different version of the "Step It Up" song. He also used RMT 1.28 at 15 kHz mode, but also Patch 8 version this time: http://atariage.com/forums/topic/234769-rmt-patch-8/?p=3501925 How do you like it?
  13. I wonder what exactly helps to raise the quality. - In 50 Hz mode it's clearly audible to hear the high note peaks to start the filter reset - Then it takes another 1/50 second to control the filter offset - The offset note interferes far more with the whole instrument note settings If I'm right, this shows that the 50 Hz mode Always sound worse with respect to the 100 Hz mode. Also the 200 Hz mode, and so on. The correct usage of filter reset & offset should sound excellent. A bypass would be the solution.
×
×
  • Create New...