Jump to content

caextreme.org

Members
  • Content Count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by caextreme.org


  1. In light of recent discussion group postings regarding California

    Extreme and the Classic Gaming Expo, a few words of clarification

    are needed. While I am out of touch with the climate and decorum

    in discussion groups, I was concerned with the words used to

    discuss such business in a public forum. I appreciate frank

    discussion, however when incomplete or apocryphal statements

    are made or people are publicly disparaged without compelling

    reason, a more complete understanding must be brought to light.

     

    I'll try to make a "long story" short, but not so short as to

    give a misleading picture.

     

    To quote John (cx2k) from Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:21 pm

    (http://www.atariage.com/forums)

    "As previously stated, we tried to join forces with CAX but they weren't willing to work with us on the level we wanted. It seems they got burned pretty bad by the Vintage Computer Festival people and want no part of joining shows where there's any chance they might not get as much revenue."

     

    and from John (cx2k) Wed Feb 04, 2004 10:59 pm

    (http://www.digitpress.com/forum)

    "We have approached them several times regarding teaming up and hosting one big event. They have no interest in doing this. They are afraid of losing some of their revenue since they had a previous bad experience with the Vintage Computer Festival. Our intention was to have one show with one admission price, they wanted attendees to pay $40 admission to them and then $35 admission for us which is totally unacceptable in our eyes. We tried many times to work something out but no such luck."

     

    It is unfortunate that John has chosen to stress questionable

    points and leave out relevant facts. Months ago, John called

    me on the telephone a couple of times to discuss the possibility

    of connecting CGE and CA Extreme. I liked the idea of convenience

    for attendees (although there barely seems to be enough time in

    a weekend for ONE show) but indicated that a formal combination

    of the two shows would bring a lot of problems. It was suggested

    that all the convenience could be had by locating the shows

    next to each other on the same weekend. John advocated a single

    admission price, but that seemed to the Extreme staff a risky

    prospect. I suggested it would be difficult to determine a way

    to allocate any "combined" revenues that would be likely to

    end up "fair", and that any rules would need to be established

    in advance, that's just good sense. After asking the advice of

    our entire staff and some savvy friends, no one had a good way

    to set this up. If the shows were run at a profit, some risk

    could be taken in transferring revenue between shows, but CAX

    budget is run out of pocket, and to date no personal profit

    has been made, with all revenue going to cover show expenses.

    It seemed clear that a combined admission equal to the current

    single show price, which John seemed to advocate, could not

    possibly cover the costs of both shows. A higher price was then

    considered. Our concern was that some show attendees would have

    little interest in the other show. For example, many Extreme

    attendees are pinball fans with no interest in video games,

    coin-operated or home console. It seemed unreasonable to ask

    such people to be compelled to pay more, regardless of

    their range of interest. We suggested offering a $10 evening

    discount for attendees of both shows. That would make full

    admission to CGE and Saturday Night at CA Extreme $35+$15=$50,

    adding Sunday at CA Extreme bringing the total to $65. Those

    numbers seem fair, and are in the ballpark of what Chris

    (vectrexer) Posted on: Sun Feb 08, 2004 4:52 pm at

    http://www.digitpress.com/forum as a suggestion.

     

    As to the combined show location, in our early conversations,

    I described our venue to John. The space in Parkside that we

    don't use was not to John's liking - it was too small and

    could not accommodate a separate museum room. I suggested they

    look into the Civic Auditorium, which is just across

    the plaza from our hall, and was available the same weekend.

    Apparently it didn't suit their purposes. John did not

    suggest any other venue.

     

    The following quotes from email I had sent to John support

    this view:

     

    A quote from a private email from me to John on January 23, 2004:

    "We are not

    in a position for a formal merge of the shows, but are fine with

    CGE sharing the weekend. When I last spoke with the SJCC, I

    was told the Civic Auditorium, which is directly across the small

    parking plaza from the Parkside Hall which we use, was available.

    Use of the facility should be arranged with SJCC soon if it is

    desired."

     

    and a quote from a private email from me to John on January 27, 2004:

    "We can probably offer something like a $10 discount for those with

    a CGE badge after 6 PM on Saturday or something like that. If we

    end up neighbors, we can check on details."

     

    Again, it could be my lack of familiarity with the tone of the

    web site communications, but I don't understand why John felt

    it necessary to post such unfriendly words. Sellam of VCF

    apparently objected to the posts as well, and felt compelled

    to respond. For the record, Sellam and I are on good

    speaking terms, and although the post clearly had the

    potential to stir up a fight, we easily discussed the issues

    over the phone and there is no problem between us.

    The specific discussion of VCF with CGE had consisted of

    examples of how difficulties arose in combining the shows

    (over discounted combined admission, for example) and that

    the experience had given us a lesson in caution, and that

    combining shows would require careful detailed agreements

    ahead of time. An example of the discussion comes from

    email I sent John on January 23: (in the past when we)

    " ... tried to closely partner with another group or

    organization, the result has been much extra work, risk,

    and loss to CA Extreme, with little to no actual benefit to

    either the organization or our supporters or attendees."

    The purpose was to make it clear to John that what he seemed

    to want, a loose agreement on how to combine the shows, was

    not possible. To be clear, the 2000 show combined

    with VCF did have benefits for CA Extreme, but the inherent

    difficulties make it undesirable to combine the two again.

    I was shocked that such private conversations had been

    turned into such an unfortunate public message.

     

    I hope this message clears up a few things, and quiets down any

    ill feelings rather than stirring up any new ones. I hope for

    the success of all the shows - CGE, VCF, and CA Extreme make

    up a solid group covering related, wonderful genres, but there

    is no need for conflict among a natural complimentary set.

     

    For the Extreme Team, Happy Gaming,

    Ken Chaney

×
×
  • Create New...