Jump to content

rockman_x_2002

Members
  • Content Count

    1,719
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

159 Excellent

About rockman_x_2002

  • Rank
    Stargunner
  • Birthday 01/29/1984

Contact / Social Media

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Mississippi, USA
  • Interests
    God and faith
    Video games (playing, designing)
    Music
    Art
    Movies
    Sports
  • Currently Playing
    Defender of the Crown (C64), Pinball Arcade (PS3/Vita/iOS)
  • Playing Next
    Splinter Cell: Blacklist (Wii U) or Metal Gear (MSX), haven't decided yet.

Recent Profile Visitors

17,950 profile views
  1. I hunted down FIXXL and the translate kit. FIXXL did the same as the other two Translator disks for me (loads to $0008 for Fractalus! and freezes there). Also, to give answer to your remaining three points in the earlier post (sorry I missed those)... Yes, it does appear that all original SIO caps are in place. As for the screen configurator versions, I tried the following: - Original v3.5: Will load ATR images, but is excruciatingly slow when trying to switch directories, switch to loading the chosen disk (holding the X key), etc. But does appear functional, albeit glitchy. - Fixed v3.5: Seems to work fine until you attempt to load an ATR image or boot into D1 (holding the X key). Loading an ATR puts an "!" on the screen, while trying to boot a chosen disk restarts the machine, but there's a "k" in the upper-left, and the computer freezes up. - v3.0: Couldn't get this one to work at all on the 1200XL. The results were the same, unfortunately, if I attempt to load disk images directly on the SIO2SD itself. I tried this, and even turned off loading the configurator on startup (so it would boot straight into D1 on powerup instead). The same issues occur with the game.
  2. This is the translator disk I used: http://www.atarimania.com/utility-atari-400-800-xl-xe-translator-_29943.html
  3. That makes sense, phaeron. I guess I was hoping against hope that what you said might not be the case, but it does sound like it's the nature of the beast when it comes to the 1200XL, unfortunately. It would certainly explain why Fractalus! and SIO2SD.XEX are being a bit contrary with the machine. But, since I can load the game properly using the MyIDE ][ (or so it seems), at least I'm still able to play it that way. That being said, I've read where it's possible, with a bit of surgery and effort, to swap out the 1200XL's OS with the 800XL's, but since I have a fully working 800XL (and XEGS), I kinda hate to do that. I want to try to keep the 1200XL as stock as possible (5V mod excepted). So, is there any existing way to patch the existing OS's code via the MyIDE (or some similar cartridge or device) that could correct these issues, or am I basically just stuck having to work around them? Or, better still, does there exist any kind of device similar to the Ultimate 1541 or EasyFlash 3 cartridges for the C64 that offers outright kernal replacement via the cartridge slot (doubtful as I'm sure the way Atari's cartridges work differs vastly from how the C64 does it, but it's worth asking just to clarify). Likewise, would that also imply that even if I did have Fractalus! on a real floppy loading from a real 1050 drive, it might still fail to work, or might that correct the issue (i.e., the real problem being compatibility with how the SIO2SD works, and not necessarily the game)? If that's the case, I might be willing to invest in a 1050 in good working order, a handful of floppies, and use the 800XL to transfer from SIO2SD to actual floppies and just play the games on the 1200XL from that. I know it seems like a lot of trouble and effort for just one game, but it's really more about trying to understanding the true nature of compatibility between the 1200XL and SIO2SD. It's starting to sound like even with the 5V mod in place, compatibility might still be a tad spotty at best.
  4. Just now getting the opportunity to test our what you suggested, Nezgar, and it was an excellent suggestion. I hadn't considered using the translator disk to rule out the stock OS itself as the culprit. Unfortunately, the results weren't very conclusive at all. I'm not sure if it's a result of loading off the SIO2SD or what. But the procedure was to assign the Translator disk (both OS-A and OS-B) to D1, and Fractalus! to virtual drive V1. I set the SIO2SD to boot straight to the Translator disk images (circumventing SIO2SD.XEX for the moment), and then pressed Shift + K3 on the device to swap out the "disk" to Fractalus!. Unfortunately, neither Translator disk seemed to help at all, and in fact, the game wouldn't load for either. In both cases, the Translator disk would load, and prompt for Fractalus!. After switching to that disk, it would load up to $0008 and then stop loading, crashed on a black scree before the "Lucasfilm Games" logo. Loading Fractalus! directly, I see the "Lucasfilm Games" logo, the intro animation, and title screen. When I press either "Start" or "Option" (for demo mode), the game appears to start normally (the ship flies out of the bay and descends toward the planet). But once the planet's mountain features begin to load, that's when the colors go a bit crazy, and after a moment or two, the game crashes outright. I hesitate to call the tests conclusive, however, since this was done purely off an SIO2SD. I don't have a real disk drive on hand to test with at this time, so I don't know if using an actual disk drive with a 5.25" floppy would make any difference. But other software does appear to load fine, so it leads me to think that there's just some kind of incompatibility between the 1200XL, the SIO2SD, and perhaps the loading routines used for this particular game. Also, I did pop the hood on the 1200XL to take a picture of the 5V mod that was done to it. Attached is the picture of that, but it's basically just a straight wire where R63 was, as I've seen elsewhere online. Seems fairly standard to me.
  5. Ah. Could be that then. Any non-Lucas title I've thrown at it runs like a champ. And heck, even other Lucas games work fine. Just this single one. Although, I would be curious then, if there's someone else out there that has a 1200XL with the 5v mod and an SIO2SD that could test trying to load the game. Specifically, the disk image I've been attempting to run is the one from the Internet Archive, the disk-based 1985 Epyx release of the game. https://archive.org/details/a8b_Rescue_on_Fractalus_1985_Epyx_US However, I also have an R16 of the Atari 1987 XEGS cart release on my MyIDE ][. Since it loads fine, that makes me wonder if it could well and truly be some kind of funky disk loading routine that Lucas did that just doesn't play nice with the 1200XL's OS. Might that also be tested if I were to get hold of a real 1050 disk drive, copy the image to an actual disk, and attempt to load from it there?
  6. I'm at work, so I won't have a chance until later tonight to take a peek at the board itself. However, I do have the "SIO High Speed" setting turned to "off" on both SIO2SD devices. It was originally set at its default (hsindex = 6), and I wondered if that might be the cause for the 1200XL having the issues above, so I disabled that feature. However, the same issue occurs. But again, it seems to only be with Rescue on Fractalus!, plus the issues with the SIO2SD.XEX config tool that I mentioned. For example, last night, I was able to load up two other Lucasfilm games just fine (Koronis Rift and Ballblazer). It's a bit strange that Fractalus! is the only game that doesn't seem to like running on the 1200XL.
  7. Thanks for the quick reply. I purchased this particular unit from eightbitfix.com. My understanding is the only modifications done to it is enabling 5v on the SIO port, which I presume was done by shorting R63 on the board (seems to be the standard go-to procedure based on my research online), plus a new mylar for the keyboard. Before he shipped the unit to me, he hooked it up to an official Atari Testing Station, and the only issue that came up was with the 6502, which he replaced, and afterwards all the tests, including the RAM, tested clear. I don't have any testing software on hand to give it a thorough memory test, but if you can recommend perhaps an application for that purpose, preferably that could run off my MyIDE ][ cart since that seems to be working fine, I'd be glad to give it a try just to double check. I hesitate to lay blame to the memory because I can run the game from the MyIDE cart, and it works perfectly fine there. Seems like if it were a memory issue, the game would crash no matter where it's being loaded from, plus it seems that perhaps other games might also have issues loading. I'm more than willing to investigate, however. As for testing other menu selection revisions, I did attempt to try v3.0 on both SIO2SD devices (just the normal version, not the turbo one). On the 800XL and XEGS, it works fine, but on the 1200XL, v3.0 locks up as soon as I attempt to enter a directory.
  8. A little background: This weekend, I acquired a 1200XL with the 5V SIO mod done to it so I can use self-powered devices like the SIO2SD. Before this, I already owned an 800XL and a XEGS, and I have two SIO2SD devices (one bare board, and one in a nice case, both from Lotharek), and a MyIDE-][ cart (but that's not the subject of this particular post). I'm seeing some odd behavior out of the 1200XL when trying to use the SIO2SD, and I'm wondering if it's due to some difference in the OS that I'm not aware of. I've tried searching on this forums and various other places across the Internet, and I haven't quite found anything quite like I'm seeing. Here's the details of the hardware setup: The 1200XL is running Rev 11 OS Both SIO2SD devices are on firmware 3.1 RC2 I have both the original and 400/800 fixed versions of the SIO2SD Configurator v3.5 (SIO2SD.XEX) on a 2GB SD card When I boot the original version of SIO2SD.XEX, the configurator behaves differently than what I see on the 800XL. For example, whenever I choose a directory on screen, it takes an extremely long time to actually load the access the SD card. When it finally finishes, instead of refreshing the bottom half of the screen and showing just the directory's contents, it just adds the directory's contents below what's already there. If I press the inverse video key to force a refresh, it just spits the directory contents again below what's there. Sometimes, a directory fails to load at all, though, and pressing the inverse video key seems to joggle it and make the directory output. Likewise, pressing and holding the "X" key to load the disk image(s) selected takes forever for the computer to actually reset and start loading. If I swap to the fixed version of SIO2SD.XEX for the 400/800, the directory loading seems to work properly. However, if I attempt to assign a .ATR image, an exclamation point appears at a random location on the screen, and the computer freezes. Likewise, if a disk image is already present, and I press and hold the "X" key to load, a "k" character appears in the top-left corner of the screen, and the computer again freezes up. The other issue seems to occur with only certain games when loaded. For example, with Rescue on Fractalus! (1985 Epyx disk), the game appears to load fine. But after pressing the "Start" key, and after descending onto the planet, when the mountains begin to load, the graphics glitch out, and the game ultimately crashes. Other games, however, like The Eidolon, or even simpler games like Q*Bert and Star Raiders, seem to load perfectly fine. As a side note, loading Fractalus! cart image for the XE (1987) via MyIDE ][, incidentally, seems to work just fine. Likewise, using the original v3.5 SIO2SD.XEX on both the 800XL and XEGS loads all games correctly, including the aforementioned version of Fractalus!. The MyIDE ][ behaves exactly the same in the 1200XL as it does on the 800XL and XEGS, and nothing immediately stands out as an issue with the 1200XL itself. Is there something that I'm missing regarding the 1200XL that's different from the 800XL and XEGS, such as some difference in the OS, or has anyone ever run into this issue? I'm at work at the moment, and won't be able to fire up the 1200XL until later, but if pics of the screen for the above problems would be helpful, I'll be glad to post those.
  9. Just received my copy of the game in the mail today and it's every bit as amazing as I thought it would be. Really looking forward to a deep dive into this one! Amazing job, TailChao and Rushjet1!
  10. Absolutely and totally fair, and I agree. I wish (today's) Atari were a bit more tolerant of folks using the brand, but I guess the situation is what it is. Incidentally, I have this issue where I keep throwing money at the monitor and nothing's happening. Guess I'll have to just wait and buy the game through the, uh... normal channels. Seriously, though, can't wait to order this one on Monday!
  11. Totally agree! Furthermore, and this is my personal feeling on the matter, but would acquiring the rights to use the Atari name even be something constructive to persue, regardless of how the company feels about us (i.e., the retrogaming community) using the name? Not just for this game, but any homebrew game? I mean, that's additional money that would have to be budgeted, which could be put to better use in promoting the game, the developers, and work on future projects. Why hide what is very clearly an excellent quality title behind the banner of a "known" brand entity like Atari. To me, it would be far better to allow the work to establish a unique name for the folks that actually developed it. Using the Atari brand would water down that effort honestly. Nevermind the fact that you'd be begging for the use of the Atari branding from a company that, quite frankly, doesn't appear to give two red cents about this community beyond simple money-grabs, and then paying for the privilege.
  12. I'm just now catching up to the news about this game. I saw the preview trailer and was absolutely blown away. Astounding work here. Graphics of a late-80s NES title with music on par with some PC Engine/TurboGrafx 16 games that I've come across. Definitely a must-have for me. Great job!!!
  13. Wasnt sure quite where to post because I didnt see it posted elsewhere yet, but felt it was important news for our community. Source article: http://fortune.com/2018/05/26/atari-co-founder-ted-dabney-dead/ RIP and God speed, Mr. Dabney. You started a technological revolution that you couldnt have begun to imagine at the time. You will be missed.
  14. Just saw this thread, and I don't get a chance to post a whole lot these days, but being a software developer (not a homebrew dev, sadly, but I work for a company as a mobile app developer), I did read over the contract, and as a layman and not a lawyer, it really and truly does sound like the entire first paragraph reads as, "Sign this and we own everything, up to and including your first-born son." I know that may not be Hyperkin's intention, and I really and truly hope not, but it very much reflects the way the contract reads. As a software developer, I would never sign a contract like this.
  15. I was born in 1984, so just immediately after the crash. An older sibling owned the Atari 2600 and Commodore 64, so I got to experience those growing up, along with the consoles which came thereafter (NES, SNES, and so forth). As for why I continue to play games on the 2600, part of it is for nostalgic reasons, but also part of it is because many of the games are still fun even today. They're great for quick pick-up-and-play sessions, unlike a lot of the more modern titles (and by that, I mean modern in relation to the 2600 even), which require you to really sit down and dig in for great lengths of time. The games on the 2600 and its contemporaries put me in mind of a lot of games available for mobile devices today, at least the good ones.
×
×
  • Create New...