Jump to content

ZippyTheGrunt

New Members
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

About ZippyTheGrunt

  • Rank
    Combat Commando

Profile Information

  • Location
    Midwest
  • Currently Playing
    Zombie Army 4

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 100% agree. This is the only thing I saw I wasn't sure about while watching. It would make sense if it was a competitive thing, where you are trying to steal points or something, but I thought this was purely cooperative. It would be cool to get some clarification on if its final (or not) or maybe just a "once you play it" type of thing. Also let me be clear, I would buy it today as is, haha.
  2. I did some research on this because I was curious too. So they downloaded the youtube video in 60 fps and used VLC to go frame-by-frame and analyze the movement with frames. They basically counted 10 frames in between movement. According to how you would break this down into readable terms, you would have to do 10/60 = .160 so that's the equivalent of 160ms of lag. For laymen, that would seem like a ping of 160 in a multiplayer game. I didn't make this method up, this was logic used by others to review videos of project xcloud and stadia. I'm not disputing the video, BUT there are some factors not being taken into account. Unfinished software and hardware (obvious point, but needs to be said again) UI and other gameplay videos, like Astrosmash, don't seem to show this same lag (only in my limited testing) Forward momentum - characters generally have some forward momentum, so you are not supposed to turn on a dime (vary by software title) Overall I think the method is flawed because there are too many unknown variables, but I have never created a videogame either. From the video, it actually looks fine and I agree with others I am not worried. I hope that helps someone.
×
×
  • Create New...