atarian1
-
Content Count
663 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by atarian1
-
-
Just when my feedback score went back to 100% from the last dimwit buyer a year ago another one came along.
Here is the eBay listing: eBay Auction -- Item Number: 310222052424
The buyer claims it is not an Atari System. Here is their actual text.
"This console was for a collection. It does not say "Atari." The games are not original Atari. Everything is Sears Tele-Games. I'd never heard of it so I didn't know to watch for it."
Here is my responce in the dispute resolution center:
"The buyer thinks this is not an Atari system. It IS an Atari system. It is simply a version that was sold through Sears. The auction listing clearly described that this is a Sears branded Atari system. I had that in the title, in the description (at the beginning with bold color letters to make it stand out), and it could easly be seen in the picture that it was a Sears Telegames brand Atari system. The buyer could've not bid if they were unsure. The buyer could've contacted me prior to leaving me frivolous negative feedback. The buyer is obviously new (feedback=2) and doesn't know what they are doing. As a result I have lost fees due to a negative PayPal balance and have lost my 100% feedback score; all with no fault of my own. I am a very good seller and even refund shipping charges to exact amounts (see all my refunds in this regard in PayPal). Its not right for the buyer to do this to me. Negative feedback should ONLY be allowed once a dispute has been ruled in favor."
Guess how eBay ruled...In the buyer's favor. What?!?! Am I missing something?
I'm going against the tide here, so...
I think the wording and description was confusing. The way it's worded "Atari 2600 - Sears System..." makes it sound like it is an Atari 2600 system. It sounds like you bought this Atari 2600 from Sears, so the buyer may not realize it's a Sears product. Even with the bolded "Sears brand Atari 2600 System", I think it's easy to miss the "Sears brand" part if one doesn't realized that there was such a thing called the Sears Telegames system. The real nail on the head to me though was the list under "You will receive:" It clearly says "Atari 2600 system". Not "Sears Telegames system" which is what you should have stated. That stands out much more than the bolded text above. The way it is read is "You will receive: Atari 2600 system".
A newbie could not tell from the picture if it is a Sears or Atari unit, or know the difference.
Next time, do the following:
- The title should say "Sears Telegames System - Atari 2600 compatible console".
- Replace the "Sears brand Atari 2600" with "Sears Telegames System - Atari 2600 compatible console".
- Under "You will receive", state what it really is - a "Sears Telegames System".
I think eBay ruled correctly here. (for once...)
Anybody who knows anything about 2600 consoles can tell that is a Sears model by the woodgrain color. Besides, pop in a 2600 cart and see if works. Guess what? It does! The auction listing was clear and ebay's decision is proof that they are staffed by morons...
But not everyone knows everything about 2600 consoles. Just because you are an expert doesn't mean everyone else is. If one is not clear as in this description, there will be confusion...and frustration. Again, it clearly says "You will receive: Atari 2600 system" - NOT a Sears system.
Some people are picky about which 2600 they have. Again, just because you don't care doesn't mean others don't care either. Just look around here! Some people want the 6-switch, heavy sixer, junior, etc. Look at label variations. Would you like it if an auction showed a different label variation than what is in the description? I don't think so. However, it's still the same game.
When writing an auction description, one should be write it as if an Atari newbie (i.e. the general public) is reading it. In this case, it was confusing because the description switches between "Sears" and "Atari" several times. I can't see how anyone with decent English skills can call this a well written description.
-
Just when my feedback score went back to 100% from the last dimwit buyer a year ago another one came along.
Here is the eBay listing: eBay Auction -- Item Number: 310222052424
The buyer claims it is not an Atari System. Here is their actual text.
"This console was for a collection. It does not say "Atari." The games are not original Atari. Everything is Sears Tele-Games. I'd never heard of it so I didn't know to watch for it."
Here is my responce in the dispute resolution center:
"The buyer thinks this is not an Atari system. It IS an Atari system. It is simply a version that was sold through Sears. The auction listing clearly described that this is a Sears branded Atari system. I had that in the title, in the description (at the beginning with bold color letters to make it stand out), and it could easly be seen in the picture that it was a Sears Telegames brand Atari system. The buyer could've not bid if they were unsure. The buyer could've contacted me prior to leaving me frivolous negative feedback. The buyer is obviously new (feedback=2) and doesn't know what they are doing. As a result I have lost fees due to a negative PayPal balance and have lost my 100% feedback score; all with no fault of my own. I am a very good seller and even refund shipping charges to exact amounts (see all my refunds in this regard in PayPal). Its not right for the buyer to do this to me. Negative feedback should ONLY be allowed once a dispute has been ruled in favor."
Guess how eBay ruled...In the buyer's favor. What?!?! Am I missing something?
I'm going against the tide here, so...
I think the wording and description was confusing. The way it's worded "Atari 2600 - Sears System..." makes it sound like it is an Atari 2600 system. It sounds like you bought this Atari 2600 from Sears, so the buyer may not realize it's a Sears product. Even with the bolded "Sears brand Atari 2600 System", I think it's easy to miss the "Sears brand" part if one doesn't realized that there was such a thing called the Sears Telegames system. The real nail on the head to me though was the list under "You will receive:" It clearly says "Atari 2600 system". Not "Sears Telegames system" which is what you should have stated. That stands out much more than the bolded text above. The way it is read is "You will receive: Atari 2600 system".
A newbie could not tell from the picture if it is a Sears or Atari unit, or know the difference.
Next time, do the following:
-
- The title should say "Sears Telegames System - Atari 2600 compatible console".
- Replace the "Sears brand Atari 2600" with "Sears Telegames System - Atari 2600 compatible console".
- Under "You will receive", state what it really is - a "Sears Telegames System".
I think eBay ruled correctly here. (for once...)
-
-
Just wanted to drop a note for anyone wanting the stay at the Tropicana where CGE is held.
I just reserved my room today, so there should still be rooms available. You need to call the 1-888 reservations number with the CGE code in order to book the room at the special rate. As others have said above, the rest of the hotel is booked, but NOT for CGE guests. So, please help CGE pay for the show expenses by staying at the Tropicana.
Thanks. -
To me, the obvious ones are the:
RAM upgrade (the stuff in front)
TOS switcher (the left side stuff connected to a switch in back)
I don't know what the 9-pin port is connected to. It could be a CGA/EGA/VGA output port? It looks like it since it looks like the wires are connected to the monitor connector pins.
The RCA jack is audio out since it's connected to pin 1 of the monitor port which is audio out.
-
Yep. Any Hayes compatible modem will do. Since modems are so cheap these days, I recommend getting a good name brand modem. I highly recommend Hayes, Supra, and Practical Peripherals.I remember using my Supra 56k modem with my MegaST and Falcon in the last days of BBSing in the late 90s.
The modem will drop down in speed if the computer can't handle it. Therefore, my MegaST would max out at 19200 baud, but my Falcon would take advantage of the 57600 baud or faster if it could. Yeah, those were the days.
-
You need to get a TV/game switchbox first and hook it up to your TV. Then you plug the RCA cable between the 1040ST and the switchbox.
You cannot hook up the 1040ST RF output directly into the composite input of your TV.
-
I don't think it's that expensive compared to other similar devices, right? The Ultrasatan was more expensive at around US$120.
I mean, how much were you expecting to pay? $30?
Come on, do we have to go through Econ 101 again? 
You know, small orders=higher prices. -
As I said in another thread, I am definitely going!
-
AtariAge is going to be at CGE?! I am SO there!
Albert, you better bring LOTS of homebrews as I'm going to be catching up on my "to buy" list!!
-
My feedback:
Seller asked for extra money after payment, insulted me, item was very dirty
I was going to write about the broken carts, but ran out of characters.
Her complaint:
I see you left negative feedback for no reason. Asking to be compensated for additional postage is not sufficient grounds to mar my reputation with negative feedback. Negative feedback is generally reserved for transactions where the buyer and seller cannot work things out. You never even contacted me! The unit was quickly shipped, & well packaged. It arrived exactly how it was depicted in the auction. The unit is 27 years old and was in storage it is not unreasonable that it would be dusty/dirty. Again, you received exactly what you bid on. I have contacted Ebay and filed a complaint against you regarding your unfair feedback. I am requesting a Feedback Revision. I have provided them with all of our correspondence. They suggested I contact you directly and ask for the revision before we proceed. I am a serious Ebayer and I take my feedback seriously. Please think about this transaction and revise your feedback. Thank You, Debbie
And my response:
First off, requesting additional money outside of the purchase is very out of line. But that's not why I left negative feedback.
I responded concisely and politely, and you insulted me. Not good seller behavior.
Further, the system was the dustiest I've encountered and I own literally thousands of games over 40+ unique platforms. I had to disassemble the system to clean it enough to get it to work. You made no mention of that.
Finally, some of the cartridges just plain don't work. Pitfall, to be specific. And I know it doesn't work because I've clean the contacts myself and tried it with multiple systems (I have more than one Intellivision).
I may not have been on eBay long, but I have made dozens of transactions on multiple classic video game trading web sites, and this transaction was easily the worst I've experienced. You harassed me, insulted me, failed to describe the condition of the system, and sent me some broken cartridges. You tarnished your own reputation.
I agree with BuyAtari, Mirage and the seller here on the shipping aspect. I don't think it's rude just asking for additional money for the shipping difference. You could have just ignored her but instead, you started to become a insult-fest with the second paragraph in your original response.
This happened to me once. Yes, I DID place the item in the box with styrofoam protection and used the shipping calculator to display the shipping cost in my auction description. I don't know how it happened, but when the auction ended, the shipping came up $2.70 more. I asked the buyer if she could pay the difference, and she did. No big deal.
You should have just mentioned the dirty system/non-working carts instead in your negative feedback remarks. That is more appropriate in this case.
-
1
-
-
New TV arrived today - the Sharp Aquos LC32LE700UN. And much to my incredible surprise, besides having an amazing picture w/LED full panel lighting - the damn thing actually displays 50/60Hz 15Khz RGB video!! I couldn't believe it - I had just hooked the ST up as a lark, because just about everything has failed this test over the years.
And yes, it's not cheap being a top of the line LCD HDTV. I purchased it for HD current gen gaming, but was blown away that it can actually handle the low rate RGB. Now all I need to do is build a SCART > VGA adapter and I can connect all the SCART RBG capable consoles too. Woot!
Wow. That sounds great!
How did you hook it up? Did you build a cable from the RGB monitor port to the VGA port? (ie connect red to red, green to green, horizontal sync to horizontal sync, etc)
I don't understand the SCART-VGA cable you are planning to build. Where does that fall in this maze of adapters?
-
As has been alluded to by others previously in the thread, the lack of U.S. support *really* hurt the ST in later days, amongst other things. The original 520ST $799 monochrome/$999 color was a price/performance breakthrough. The 1040ST was another, with the first under-$1000 (by a dollar) computer with a MEG of RAM. But that's pretty much where the breakthroughs seem to have stopped. The Megas weren't any screaming deal.
What?
Where could you get a 4MB machine in Fall 1987 for under $2500? Nowhere! It was a great deal for those who needed the extra memory such as desktop publishing and music applications. -
What is Tempest 2000? It's some basic looking very simple game, hardly looking different to some obscure original arcade game from way back (certainly Tempest has been played less than anything made by Konami or Capcom as far as arcades go) and nor is it mentioned in the same breath as Pacman, Asteroids, Donkey Kong and Galaxian. Please....some weirdo breathed over some colour vector graphic game he likes for a small fee and you think it is genius? ha ha well he tried the same thing with Space Giraffe and it sold about 30 copies on Xbox Live for 360 (to his low-brow fans at the pathetic badly moderated llamasoft forum I bet) but it disappeared without a trace, and review scores from people worth listening to ranged from 2/10 to about 5/10 if they were being generous...and that is taking into account the game was like 6 bucks ha ha. 2/10 for 6 bucks...how embarassing...the only reason he still bothers to write games is because he is broke and probably mentally deranged now.
And before you say 'gameplay' there are unexpanded VIC-20/Atari VCS games that have more variety, better gameplay and more interesting graphics
So you have an expensive game, with average gameplay at best, uninspired graphical update to an old and all but forgotten arcade game compared to the real remembered games like Pacman and DK etc. Whooopeee this animal lover (in the illegal sense of the word I would add) is your 'hero' lol please. I would rather play Star Raiders on VCS than listen to that cheesy dime store soundtracked rubbish called T2k.There were some interesting games on the Jag, this is not one of them. There are some truly incredible retro remakes of early 80s arcade games (like Super Stardust) but Tempest 2000 (or the even worse Tempest 3000 on the Nuon) is not in either category of conversation
The above reminds me of people hating T2K because it didn't have texture mapping.
FYI, it doesn't need texture mapping. The gourand shading effect is MUCH better. I don't know where you were, but I remember people were amazed at T2K when I was "demonstrating" (ie playing it!
) on the Jag kiosks at the many retailers who had them. T2K the same as a Capcom/Konami game? HAHAHA! You have GOT to be kidding me! How many more run/jump/shoot platform games can we take from those companies? They just produced more shovelware with different graphics and sound. Compared to the other games available at the time, T2K was VERY unique and different. It did have elements of other popular games at the time (power-ups, bonuses, etc) but that's were the similarities end. The excellent updated graphics, frantic fast-paced action and a raving techno soundtrack really set this game apart from other games at the time. That's why many people were attracted to it. Obviously, you weren't, but you're in the minority here...
-
This, of course, reminds me of one of the "problems" preventing me from returning to the 16-bit generation - "Which one to get?" With the A8 and C64 you can run anything. ST or STe? There isn't a single model that will run everything. I'm assuming it's the same with the Amiga - 500 for old games and 1200 for new games? All these ROM and/or OS versions. It just seems like it would take lots of time, money, and desk space (more than one machine, each) to be able to run *everything*. I'd like to hear that I'm wrong about this....
That is an issue. For games, the OS doesn't matter too much, as most game (all I've seen) are OS independent on the Amiga. But ROM version is an issue, as is hardware platform.
Most people get an Amiga 500, which will play 90%+ of the games. I don't know of any games that "require" a higher ROM version, but there are many that require a lower ROM version (1.3 covers most of the games). So, if you want an updated ROM for your OS (which you probably would IF you want to use it for something other than games), you'll want a kickstart switcher. Either hardware or software.
Now, the Amiga 1200 includes AGA and there are some games that require that. But the AGA chipset does break a few games. Luckily some smart engineer thought of it. When booting the Amiga 1200, you can hold down both mouse buttons and you get a boot menu screen where you can choose the old (non-AGA) chipset and disable some caching features, select PAL/NTSC, etc... If you combine that with a boot disk that boots the 1.3 ROM, you can run almost every game. But it's a few steps.
There's a program called WHDLoad that makes this even easier IF you have some extra memory for your 1200. Basically, you can run the game with any of those settings (including telling it to run that game with the 1.3 ROM) and it runs the game from a HD. My Amiga 1200 doesn't have any extra RAM tho, so I'm not using it. (Actually, you can use it on some games without the extra RAM, I got one to work, but you really need the extra RAM to get that to work.)
So, if you want most games, you should get an Amiga 500 with 1.3 ROM. If you want virtually all games, you can get a 1200. And a 1200 with a HD and RAM and WHDLoad will get almost all games much more easily.
I can see why this is confusing to people.
I have to admit, I was looking into getting an Atari 800 (always liked the look of them), but started reading about some games might need more memory than it can provide. People saying I needed something like the 130XE or XEGS, but would they play all the old games? Slowed me down just enough that something else shiny attracted my eye and I don't have one yet... I'll get back to doing research on that later. But I can see where that whole issue is very confusing for people.
I've not looked at it with the ST. I know it has different TOS versions and configs, but I'm not sure how that affects game compatibility. I was given a 520STf, and that's when I found out that some STs didn't support composite/TV out (not an STfm). That was pretty frustrating. It's just sitting in a closet. Yeah, I could get a cable and hook it up to my VGA monitor, but that's hires only, and not most of the games... Oh well..
desiv
Wow. More drivel and false information from bored Amiga fanboys. I guess I should not be surprised now.
First of all, if you want to run every ST game out there, you get TOS 1.0. If you have a later version of TOS, you can use SELTOS.PRG to load up a TOS 1.0 image file. You can also go the hardware route and get a TOS switcher so that you can have multiple versions of TOS in your machine at a flick of a switch. There are hacks of this on the net.
-
1
-
-
This is the thread that never ends.... Yeah, I know.
I guess the Amiga fanboys here are tired of their Amigas and have boost their low self-esteem and egos by making up stuff about the ST to entertain themselves. Sad... -
2
-
-
Sorry Atarian1 that you feel the way you do, but I was looking at this rollout ST system as I would the rollout Amiga 1000 back in the day and conversely right here and right now. This particular ST setup is crippled beyond belief comparatively. Its OS is frustratingly weak and the 360kb drive is somebody's idea of a bad joke. Sorry, but you usually get what you pay for in life, but spending upwards of $100 or more (today) on a DS/DD ST drive is not my idea of a good value. If people think this was a good deal back then - great, that's your prerogative. I just don't see the value here, especially today when so many others have suggested I get a different ST system for simple cost reasons.
Nice change of subject.
It's not "crippled" if you actually give it a try, but it's obvious that you won't give it a try. -
1
-
-
I guess that explains the fanatical Amiga following that still exists today.
Dude, you decided the ST was superior from day 1 and clearly, nothing is ever going to change that.
Your talk about the AmigaOS sounds more like that of a salesman that is trying to sell the Atari instead of someone that actually used the Amiga. All I can say is your experience was clearly different than mine. Beyond that... not much else to say.
Very well put JamesD. There's no doubt Atarian is seriously biased towards the ST and that's fine, but not at the expense of constant regurgitating of obvious misinformation.
BTW: I recently acquired a 520ST w/ a near worthless 354 single sided disk drive and e-mailed him for some advice on how to proceed with this. Figured since he's "Mr. ST", he'd have a nice starter kit he could sell. Maybe still does and just hasn't gotten around to answering since yesterday, BUT.... damn, I gotta tell you... out of the box, this ST system is hardly resembles a computer at all. You can't do JACK with it as it sits. And I keep hearing people talk about the Amiga 1000 costing so much and being buggy. That's simply BS. At the end of 1986, my used 512kb A1000 (from a legitimate computer reseller with a store) w/ OS 1.1 and 1.2 cost me less than $400. The machine comes with a superior composite output circuit too, so hooking it to a standard TV or monitor at the time was no big deal. RGB was crisper, but I was on a MAJOR budget back then. Ahem, anyway... even the earliest AmigaOS was sooooo much more feature laden than what I'm seeing built into this TOS thing. Seriously, this is only the second time in my life I've ever buggered with an ST, but what am I missing here? Are there some GEM/TOS disks I'm missing? Have you seen the Preferences section of this machine? You can change maybe three aspects of the computer. Literally. I'm still laughing out loud about the 360kb DD.
I know why my pleas haven't been answered by anyone yet here... it's cause they DON'T want yet another user to learn that the ST is a shell (pun intended) of a computer comparatively. lol Okay, just kidding here guys - no need to flame. But honestly, what I've got sitting before me (even the 1224's screen is tiny) seems like a total joke of a computer system. I either need to upgrade the OS or it's just gonna sit all boxed up. Can I get a frickin' DS/DD disk drive for this thing under $30?!? I always did like reading the computer mags of the day... comparing the ST, Mac and Amiga. ST was always rated under the Amiga, but was still considered a "good value", until the late 80's when it was clear it was totally dead that is. Again, not sure where Atarian is getting his "facts" about Amiga not picking up steam until the 500. Totally untrue. Amiga was already full steam ahead. The 500 was released as an ST killer and it worked - immediately. Growing up in Chicagoland, I couldn't tell you there were ANY dealers of ST stuff and I was quite computer savvy back then. Only time I ever saw an ST in real life was at an Amiga/PC store. They used a 1040 (I think) as their POS/cash register! (point of sale). Not kidding. I think it had the "hi-res" b/w monitor too. Ironic, but cool I thought that they'd use an ST like that.
One thing I like about the ST so far, is how FAST it boots up. Then again, if you stripped AmigaOS down to what I'm seeing here, I'm sure we'd have an apples/apples comparison
BTW: the ST ONLY boots fast *IF* there is a disk inside the drive. If you turn on the computer with no disk, the thing takes FOREVER to boot. What's up with that? And why is there a Disk A and Disk B icon for a single sided drive? Weird. So far, as an Amiga guy, my experience in dealing with an ST is much like stepping out of a Cadillac and crawling into a Cavalier. lolBTW: none of this stuff came with manuals, but what would you say boxed examples that are in mint or near mint condition would be worth?
520ST
SF354
SC1224
...by my estimations, I think I'm sitting on about $30-$40 worth of stuff here (yeah, what a crock). Know what a similar Amiga 1000 setup goes for? Try $200-$300. So, this may neither be here nor there, but MOST people when asked what's "better", will look at it strictly from a monetary point of view. I'd still like to do *something* semi productive with an ST though. Would like a little more "hands on" before ditching completely or relegating to the classic computer museum. lol
You know why I don't help Amiga fanboys like you? it's because of your attitude. Why should I help you (Amiga fanboy) when everything you say is accompanied by a snide remark about the ST? It's like trying to help out a bully while still putting you down every time you help the idiot. How would you feel? I have seen your Amiga fanboy attitude all along this thread, so why should I waste my time trying to help you if you're just going to put down the ST and us users with your snide remarks every time we try to help?
You say you're trying to give the ST a chance by buying one. Bulls**t, you're nothing but a poser. I see your attitude and I know you're not even going to give the ST a chance even if I do help you since I can see your Amiga fanboyism is as thick as mud.
Next time you wonder why no one wants to help you in anything, try looking in the mirror for once, and THINK, for once about why people won't help you.
Now, I know most Amiga people I have met are not like the ones in this thread, because I can tell you, REAL Amiga enthusiasts are embarrassed to be associated with "fellow" Amiga enthusiasts on this thread. I would be too.
-
First things first - Get some Double Sided-Double Density (DSDD) floppy disks! Using High Density (DSHD) floppies as DSDD will not work and is unreliable.
Here's a source for DSDD floppy disks. Seems reasonably priced. You can find them on ebay too if you want to go that route.
What you describe when you are looking at the floppy drive sounds right to me. It's looking for a readable floppy disk, but it can't find anything, so it keeps trying, and trying, and trying, etc. Get some DSDD disks first and them post your results...
-
I don't really care how one votes, but it's possible that someone can vote A8 has surpassed St in everything and be right. I know a lot of people when I was building science projects who had all sorts of hardware installed in their A8 machines including one he was using to control a Robot. Obviously, he's not going to pick the ST which is lacking hardware support in most areas where A8 isn't.
What a bunch of bull!
People were definitely using the ST to control robots, doing science projects, and even controlled sophisticated (and expensive - $100K+) machinery. Magazine articles were full of these projects. In fact, some enterprising people even turned them into kits and sold them. If the ST is lacking the hardware support to do this, then how is it even possible they were even made? They were sold and advertised in the magazines all the time. Looking at your fanboyism, I'm going to guess that your response to this post will be "They're all lies!" like other anti-ST fanboys (ie [email protected]#$%^&*@6). This post clearly shows you don't know squat about the ST.
-
1
-
-
ST has also the DMA port, which however does not look so universal as the XL/XE PBI/ECI connector: I don't think that using the DMA port you can add autobootable devices to the ST system (autobootable: i.e. the OS does not contain predefined routines to boot them), and this PBI/ECI does allow.
I'm a bit confused about this... I mean, my Mega ST boots off a 4 gig SCSI drive. My STacy boots off a 2 gig SD card... I'm not sure what you are trying to say here. Clarify? Thanks!
BTW, hadn't seen it mentioned - can the 8bits use CDROMs? I mean as in burn them, make audio CD's all that stuff. Thanks again.
I wrote what's my point in the paragraph you haven't quoted. In the part quoted I even explain what I mean by "autobootable", but still you seem to have confused it with "bootable". I admit that this might have been obscure, so: bootable = booted by routines predefined in the OS, autobootable = booted by own routines, added externally to the OS at power-up via some sort of predefined expansion mechanism. You may also want to know that I myself owned a Falcon030 for about 14 years and coded something on it in assembly and C, so I basically know, how the ST system works (even internally).
Ok, to clarify (separate points for convenience and clarity):
1. The point is better universality of the XL/XE expansion bus over ST DMA Port.
2. ST boots off a harddisk? Sure, because BIOS contains predefined routines to boot off a harddisk (XL/XE doesn't, yet it boots off a harddisk!).
3. But, can you use the DMA port to connect to the ST an automatically initializing (= autobooting) device, for which the ST BIOS does not contain predefined routines? An IDE drive, for example? Not unless your controller is a separate computer which emulates SCSI commands which BIOS issues to the DMA port. More generally: the external device must conform to the behaviour expected by the BIOS, and you can't modify the BIOS' behaviour without modifying the TOS ROMs. At the other hand, on XL/XE this is not an issue, because it is the device itself which defines routines to handle itself, and the XL/XE "BIOS" works at the abstraction level that makes it (the "BIOS") hardware-independent. You can connect anything without a need to emulate anything.
4. Another example: can you attach a graphics card via the port and hope that the BIOS will initialize it so that you don't need to load a driver from the AUTO? So that you wouldn't wait looking at blank screen until the driver loads? I guess you can't. There is no mechanism on the ST that would allow you to attach plug-and-play cards without hacks (like these on the cart port). Yet on XL/XE it is possible to initialize an external device so that it becomes a part of the system BEFORE it goes to boot disks, or even to open the screen console.
Conclusion (not to be taken separately from the rest of the post): XL/XE is a more open architecture than ST, both hardware-wise (connectors) and, even more, software-wise (plug-and-play mechanism, known as Parallel Bus Interface, absent in ST). So in this point XL/XE seems better than ST, eventhough it is older and therefore inferior in gfx and processing power.
Yes, it is possible to connect an IDE drive to the DMA port without modifying TOS. Just make sure the hard disk driver supports it (available free or commercially available.
The Supercharger allowed an external graphics card plugged into it which connected to the DMA port.
-
I would like a copy.
Thanks.
-
Thorsten, Maurius and everyone, I want to apologize - really didn't mean for
this to turn into a run-of-the-mill ST vs Amiga thread. Been there done that,
been hacked to death countless times.
Just really tiresome to see those comments about how machine X has no
redeeming features, while machines Y is "perfect". Its usually never that
black and white, and only Sith Lords deal in absolutes.
I'm not gonna respond to any other off-topic msgs here, unless I take
it into private mode.
Thanks to the cooler/saner heads who post here.
No problem. You're only just correcting some misinformation. It's just too bad that MEtalGuy66's insecurity and immaturity continues to turn these once moderate threads into insulting, name-calling quagmires such as Post #128 in this thread.
- "A bald or gray haired old man"
(I'm not) -
I got an Atari 800 as my first computer and enjoyed it until I got my MegaST.
I prefer the ST over the 8-bit mainly because I love music too. I got tired of listening to computer music with only 4 (or 3 in the ST's case) voices, simple square wave type sounds and scratchy samples. MIDI allowed me to go beyond that limitation and the ST had the best MIDI software that I tried. It also got me through high school, college (including senior thesis), and helped get me jobs by making sharp copies of resumes and cover letters.
I did some gaming too, but not as much as I stopped pirating software when I bought the ST after seeing how stealing destroyed the 8-bit market. I learned my lesson.
I could not buy all the games that I wanted so I had to be picky. I still play games on both systems and both have different style of games too, so it's a tough choice for me to choose one over the other in terms of games. Basically, the ST could do everything and was my main machine for 10 years. How many people can stick with one machine for 10 years?
1987-1997. I actually got a Falcon in 1995, but I left it at home, so I would have a machine at home (I lived at school on weekdays, but came home on weekends). Also, I loved the ST case. Dove gray with matching parallelogram vent ports and function keys. Classy!
-
Wow.. It looks so much amazingly better on the XL/XE than it did on the Crappy ST...
First, please keep your very immature comments to yourself.
Second, I don't think so. The original can't be matched, and it would be unfair to compare the two considering the different hardware in the 2 computer lines.
However, I got to say, the programmers did a pretty darn good job on the XL/XE version too. Nice!
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Was this a dimwit buyer?
in Auction Central
Posted
Nice editing. You forgot the paste the other part:
You will receive:
Atari 2600 system
Like I said, the description is confusing because it didn't state what it really is - a Sears Telegames System. Why doesn't the seller state it for what it really is?
Anyway, it looks like everyone got their money back and all, so no one really lost anything. I hope the seller (and anyone else selling a Sears Telegames System) notes my suggestions in Post #37 to better inform their bidders of what they are really bidding on.