Jump to content
IGNORED

Best looking classic computers?


deadmeow

Recommended Posts

post-8588-1170727554_thumb.jpg

 

I had one of these for awhile, and I did some pretty sophisticated things with it. I seem to recall that most everything was done by the RS-232c port... but I could connect and transfer files between my PCs and it by null modem... it also had a built in dialer... maybe even a modem. My memory is hazy - but I'm pretty sure you could call a BBS from it. It had a bunch of little programs, and I think you could download other programs and install them, too.

 

It was my first notebook. And, for quite awhile, really one of the *best* (notebooks didn't get very functional and reliable until the post-486 era, IMO. I always found myself going, "someday these will be able to do the things my desktop can".)

 

I liked the design of this one, actually. There was something elegent about it's physical, notebook/biner size and shape.

 

I always thought the C-128 was the first REALLY good looking consumer PC. Everything prior to that had been pretty ugly. The II series looked like it had a case made out of recycled cardboard. The little one, the II+, right... just didn't do it for me with the chicklet keyboard. The C-64/Vic 20 were ugly. (although that design grew on me). I liked the Atari 400 and 800 design... and really, the XL/XE and ST design were all slick too. The Amiga 500 did look clunky. I had a 2000. It looked like a "serious" PC.

 

I have an 800, because I just think they look bitchin cool. I use the 800XL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've liked the way IBM chasis look since the P1 days. They look similar to the Apple G3 desktop chasis too. I never owned systems before the 1990 days so I can't go with a cart or tape loader, but for modern systems, IBM. <3

 

For today though, I'm all about customization. If I build a cluster it's out of either Gateway or IBM systems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had one of these for awhile, and I did some pretty sophisticated things with it. I seem to recall that most everything was done by the RS-232c port... but I could connect and transfer files between my PCs and it by null modem... it also had a built in dialer... maybe even a modem. My memory is hazy - but I'm pretty sure you could call a BBS from it. It had a bunch of little programs, and I think you could download other programs and install them, too.

 

It was my first notebook. And, for quite awhile, really one of the *best* (notebooks didn't get very functional and reliable until the post-486 era, IMO. I always found myself going, "someday these will be able to do the things my desktop can".)

 

I liked the design of this one, actually. There was something elegent about it's physical, notebook/biner size and shape.

Ahhh yes, the Tandy 102. I liked that one, too. I've used a couple of them, and actually found one of the later models (the Tandy 200, with a more laptop-like folding screen) in a local pawn shop a few years ago for $30. I later sold it for $100, but I wish I still had it.

 

It really was a pretty nice machine for its day, and had quite a variety of built-in programs (some of which were reportedly developed by Bill Gates; I've heard it's some of the last coding he did himself). Believe it or not, as recently as 1999, a local newspaper in New Jersey that I did some contract work for (the New Jersey Herald) had a few reporters who were still using the 102 to write stories in the field and upload them to the main office through the integrated 300-baud modem.

Edited by jaybird3rd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THAT was it! Built in 300 baud modem.

 

It was, in many ways, SO far ahead of its time.

 

I liked that it was the first real "tablet" PC. :) I mean, it had no hinged lid or any of that. I had some BASIC games for it that were cool, I could connect to my dialup and Telnet in and use PINE or Lynx or use the local USENET reader, or FTP files from my shell account back to the machine. It is all coming back to me.

 

Sometimes, thinking back makes me regret the progress of technology. I'm basically doing the same things now, but it takes a 3.4ghz machine to handle all the overhead that generally only makes everything look PRETTY... and all that PRETTY makes you require a 6mb cable connection to be able to get around at anything approaching a decent speed.

 

Of course, Stella at Kat 5200 would have never been very satisfying on the Tandy 102. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...