Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Heaven/TQA

Easy to port?

Recommended Posts

According to the Wiki article, the Plus4 runs at about the same speed as the Atari.

 

That raises the bar a bit more... but Atari can play catchup by implementing much more efficient scrolling methods.

 

I've also read some of the 'blog - seems to infer that the game runs at 25 FPS - looking at the video, the sprites seem to be single frame but the scrolling may well be every second frame.

 

Do you know if they have to shift the whole screen or just to similate DL with IRQ?

 

Would make much more sens to accept (be ready to accept?) constraints on playfield design and create game which is similar but not necesarly the same. Then we could play some Atari strenght s instead of fighting weakneses.

Edited by GameEngine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GameEngine... na... ;) a port...otherwise it's not a challenge...

 

If Plus/4 scrolling employs some tricks or is balanced out with some pre-calculation activities we would end up with no improvements whatsoever and require 128K RAM or cartridge. If this is the case then I do not mind if it is port from Plus/4 or ZX Spectrum version of the game.

Edited by GameEngine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the blogs on the site - they give a lot of insight into some of the methods being used.

 

He's also got a nice scripting engine for the actual sprite movement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well...Russel is doing a zx speccy port...so if not the plus/4 port we could use...then xxl will do the "report"... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Plus 4 would be much nicer - but it's all conjecture now as the game isn't finished yet.

 

And, whether the author will be willing to hand over source code is yet another matter.

 

But, I think it would be a nice trade - Xeo3 on Atari for Yoomp on the C-64.

 

In fact, Yoomp might be easier for them to do on the Plus 4, since it seems to have a good deal more grunt than a '64.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you know if they have to shift the whole screen or just to similate DL with IRQ?

 

Shift the whole screen, but it'll be double buffered and spreading the load over multiple frames so the overall CPU load per frame won't be massive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the demo looks quite good in vice... but lookin at the memory layout of plus/4 it might even harder for the XL...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but lookin at the memory layout of plus/4 it might even harder for the XL...

 

Why? In character modes, screens can be virtually identical.

 

Or do you mean the actual machine layout - seems the +4 gives a nice contiguous RAM area if you want it.

 

Of course, we have to live with the 2K black hole, which can't be swapped in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...