+Ksarul Posted June 18, 2011 Share Posted June 18, 2011 I like the second style better--it brings more of the game flair with it. . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ti99iuc Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 I like the second style better--it brings more of the game flair with it. . . thankyou for answer... well, i agree too... the second version of the manual is more egyptian , just i ask myself if will be good create all pages with this style or just someone of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+retroclouds Posted October 9, 2011 Author Share Posted October 9, 2011 Here's the lates video of my Tutankham project. I'm currently going in a new direction. The idea is that my version will be a "prequel" to the existing Tutankham game as seen on colecovison and on the TI-99/4A. Hey you never know, perhaps someday the original ROMS are released to the public domain after all. The idea is to raise the bar with this one. I'm planning on animating the title screen, adding some cut scenes and including more and difficult levels. Also the graphics will be completely redone (the new background graphics are in for the first level). The sprite (our hero) is still to be redone. This could be my last game for the TI-99/4A, as it just takes too much development time. But you never know. When will it be finished? Dunno, perhaps sometime in 2012, but might be later. Well anyway, here's the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6pxNk30XSs EDIT: Don't you just love the power of TMS9900 assembly language Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Here's the lates video of my Tutankham project. I'm currently going in a new direction. The idea is that my version will be a "prequel" to the existing Tutankham game as seen on colecovison and on the TI-99/4A. Hey you never know, perhaps someday the original ROMS are released to the public domain after all. The idea is to raise the bar with this one. I'm planning on animating the title screen, adding some cut scenes and including more and difficult levels. Also the graphics will be completely redone (the new background graphics are in for the first level). The sprite (our hero) is still to be redone. This could be my last game for the TI-99/4A, as it just takes too much development time. But you never know. When will it be finished? Dunno, perhaps sometime in 2012, but might be later. I will certainly be obtaining a cartridge copy when it is ready. It looks less like a TI-99 game and more like a Commodore 64 game. (I dream of "Trolls and Tribulations.") It is too bad we did not have very many talented programmers around back then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sometimes99er Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Looking good. And I like the direction you're taking it. Am I right in assuming that it looks more like the arcade version now ? It is too bad we did not have very many talented programmers around back then. I think a lot of programmers moved to cheaper, easier and more accessible systems. Generally Basic had its speed limitations. As a TI programmer you would realize you could not release a machine code program on cassette without requiring the buyer to have at least Mini Memory (not common) or more (also not common). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+retroclouds Posted October 10, 2011 Author Share Posted October 10, 2011 Looking good. And I like the direction you're taking it. Am I right in assuming that it looks more like the arcade version now ? It is too bad we did not have very many talented programmers around back then. I think a lot of programmers moved to cheaper, easier and more accessible systems. Generally Basic had its speed limitations. As a TI programmer you would realize you could not release a machine code program on cassette without requiring the buyer to have at least Mini Memory (not common) or more (also not common). Yes, it will resemble the arcade version more than the colecovision version. Doing multicoloured sprites is kinda difficult without running into a flicker fest. I'm considering setting up 1 colour as a background tile. That would allow 3 colours for the hero and 2 colours for the enemies (snakes, dragons, etc). The flickering should then be as in the colecovision version (which has 2 colours for the hero and 1 colour for the enemies) Implementing something like that will take a considerable amount of time and I have to be sure that I don't run in a dead end there. I do think its doable without causing a high CPU load. In Time Pilot I had part of the rotating plane and the bullets implemented as soft sprites. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocky007 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 This could be my last game for the TI-99/4A, as it just takes too much development time. But you never know. When will it be finished? Dunno, perhaps sometime in 2012, but might be later. it's the second worst news this month after Steve Job Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Vorticon Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 This could be my last game for the TI-99/4A, as it just takes too much development time. But you never know. When will it be finished? Dunno, perhaps sometime in 2012, but might be later. it's the second worst news this month after Steve Job I concur, although the sad reality is that most of us have day jobs and other interests that make the creation of new games, especially in assembly, quite laborious. My Ultimate Planet game is still dragging on, mostly because it is competing with my many other hobbies, so I have given up on a "delivery date" and will just work at it whenever I can. I'm sure many other TIers out there share the same dilemma... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 This could be my last game for the TI-99/4A, as it just takes too much development time. But you never know. When will it be finished? Dunno, perhaps sometime in 2012, but might be later. it's the second worst news this month after Steve Job I concur, although the sad reality is that most of us have day jobs and other interests that make the creation of new games, especially in assembly, quite laborious. My Ultimate Planet game is still dragging on, mostly because it is competing with my many other hobbies, so I have given up on a "delivery date" and will just work at it whenever I can. I'm sure many other TIers out there share the same dilemma... Though, in all honestly and not at all meant to start a flame war, I lament more the passing of Dennis Ritchie than that of Steve Jobs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 I just noticed on the manual pages the selection for having a speech synthesizer. I recall there is a location you can query which contains a value if the synthesizer is attached. From XB, -31905 or -39105 seem to ring a bell, though that may have been to enable/disable QUIT. Anyone know for certain? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+retroclouds Posted October 17, 2011 Author Share Posted October 17, 2011 (edited) I just noticed on the manual pages the selection for having a speech synthesizer. I recall there is a location you can query which contains a value if the synthesizer is attached. From XB, -31905 or -39105 seem to ring a bell, though that may have been to enable/disable QUIT. Anyone know for certain? Tutankham is using the spectra2 and the speech synth is automatically detected. The manual is not made by me. A while ago I requested the creator to stop working on the manual. Most likely I'll be writing one myself, once the game is finished. Edited October 17, 2011 by retroclouds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atari2atari Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Here's the lates video of my Tutankham project. I'm currently going in a new direction. The idea is that my version will be a "prequel" to the existing Tutankham game as seen on colecovison and on the TI-99/4A. Hey you never know, perhaps someday the original ROMS are released to the public domain after all. The idea is to raise the bar with this one. I'm planning on animating the title screen, adding some cut scenes and including more and difficult levels. Also the graphics will be completely redone (the new background graphics are in for the first level). The sprite (our hero) is still to be redone. This could be my last game for the TI-99/4A, as it just takes too much development time. But you never know. When will it be finished? Dunno, perhaps sometime in 2012, but might be later. So much excellence . . . ! Sign me up for a cart and manual when this is released! As someone else pointed out in another thread, this really does feel like an age of "Golden Revival" for the TI-99! -a2a Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willsy Posted October 17, 2011 Share Posted October 17, 2011 Okay, this kicks so much ass it's just not funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+retroclouds Posted October 18, 2011 Author Share Posted October 18, 2011 I'm currently doing some changes to the VDP layout. Below is what I'm thinking of implementing. Reason for the change in layout is to get more continious space, also for sound data. I'm going for the "ISR" style basic soundplayer. So I'll need some space for the sound data (which I still not really have in this layout.) The idea is to reduce the bankswitching to a minimum. If a tune needs to be played, I'll probably jump to another bank. Copy the sound data into the VDP and return to the calling bank. Then the tune can be played from VDP memory. You'll notice I have 2 PNT tables. I wanna have that for doing scrolling without frame-tearing. I'll basically be copying data from VSCREEN to one of the 2 PNTS in an alternating fashion. In other words, I'm showing the 1st PNT while copying to the 2nd PNT. Once donce copying I switch VDP register 2 to the 2nd PNT, and so on. Currently the game runs from bank2 and I don't wanna waste any space there with any kind of data, be it sound data or graphics data. ; VDP usage ; ========= ; ; ; PNT (VDP register 2) ; --------------------- ; Register 2 tells the VDP where the starting address of the Name Table is located in VRAM. The ; range of its contents is from O-F. The contents of the register form the upper four bits of ; the 14-bit VDP address, therefore making the location of the Name Table in VRAM equal to ; (Register 2) * 400 (Hex) ; ; ; CT (VDP register 3) ; ------------------- ; Register 3 tells the VDP where the starting address of the Color Table is located in VRAM. The ; range of its contents is from O-FF. The contents of the register form the upper eight bits of ; the 14-bit VDP address, therefore making the. location of the Color Table in VRAM equal to ; (Register 3) * 40 (Hex) <--- Applies to graphics mode 1 only ; ; ; PDT (VDP register 4) ; -------------------- ; Register 4 tells the VDP where the starting address of the Pattern Table is located in VRAM. ; The range of its contents is from 0-7. The contents of the register form the upper three bits of ; the 14 bit VDP address, therefore making the location of the Pattern Table in VRAM equal to ; (Register 4) * 800 (Hex). ; ; ; SAT (VDP register 5) ; -------------------- ; Register 5 tells the VDP where the starting address of the Sprite Attribute Table is located in ; VRAM. The range of its contents is from 0-7F. The contents of the register form the upper ; seven bits of the 14 bit VDP address, therefore making the location of the Sprite Attribute ; Table in VRAM equal to (Register 5) * 80 (Hex). ; ; ; SDT (VDP register 6) ; -------------------- ; Register 6 tells the VDP where the starting address of the Sprite Pattern Table is located in ; VRAM. The range of its contents is from 0-7. The contents of the register form the upper ; three bits of the 14 bit VDP address, therefore making the location of the Sprite Pattern Table ; in VRAM equal to (Register 6) * 800 (Hex). ; ; ; VRAM usage in Tutankham ; ======================= ; ; Usage Memory Description Size Remarks ; ===== ============== ====================== ========== ============================ ; SDT >0000 - >079F Sprite Pattern Table 2048 bytes - ; PNT >0800 - >0AFF 1st screen PNT (32*24) 768 bytes Active when FLAG2{WBIT3} = 0 ; SAT >0B00 - >0B7F Sprite Attribute table 128 bytes - ; FREE >0B80 - >0BFF ***RESERVED*** 128 bytes In case we need a second SAT ; PNT >0C00 - >0EFF 2nd screen PNT (32*24) 768 bytes Active when FLAG2{WBIT3} = 1 ; CT >0F00 - >0F19 Screen color table 32 bytes - ; FREE >0F20 - >0FFF ***FREE*** 196 bytes Free for future use ; PDT >1000 - >27FF Pattern descriptor table 6144 bytes The screen pattern descriptor table ; FREE >2800 - >29FF ***RESERVED*** 512 bytes This is where our sound data will go ; VSCREEN >3000 - >3FFF Magellan screen map 4096 bytes The curent level as exported by Magellan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kl99 Posted October 18, 2011 Share Posted October 18, 2011 Hi retroclouds, love your new youtube video. looks really really nice. Wish you best "elan" for the upcoming programming nights. Klaus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lucien2 Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 Though, in all honestly and not at all meant to start a flame war, I lament more the passing of Dennis Ritchie than that of Steve Jobs. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unhuman Posted March 24, 2012 Share Posted March 24, 2012 +2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OX. Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 and not to detract from the original thread - anyone know when Tutankham is going to be available? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willsy Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 Retroclouds, Do you develop on real hardware, or emulation? I know what you mean about it taking up too much time. I've thought about quitting too, but, this is my hobby and I stubbornly refuse to quit, even when I catch flak from she-that-must-be-obeyed. My argument is that I don't drink, I don't smoke, and I don't go out whoring. She knows where I am. I'm on the sofa with the classic99 debugger open! Want me to quit? Fine. I like stock-car racing. I'll take that up as an (expensive) hobby, and combine it with the above three hobbies! :-) 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurt_Woloch Posted March 25, 2012 Share Posted March 25, 2012 I just noticed on the manual pages the selection for having a speech synthesizer. I recall there is a location you can query which contains a value if the synthesizer is attached. From XB, -31905 or -39105 seem to ring a bell, though that may have been to enable/disable QUIT. Anyone know for certain? According to the Editor/Assembler manual, you can detect if the Speech Synthesizer is there by trying to read from its phrase ROM at address >0000. For part of the routine, you'll need the READIT routine for reading the speech synth's status byte running from 16-bit ROM. A variant of that code would read like this: REF SPCHWT, SPCHRD ;equates PHROM Data >0000 H10 Byte >10 HAA Byte >AA EVEN ;readit routine ; The following code segment gets copied into 16-bit RAM ; because TI states that the 8-bit bus cannot be used ; immediately after a read from the speech synth ; so we have to copy the code that reads data and does ; a delay afterwards into the 16-bit RAM, otherwise it ; would be executed from the RAM expansion, using the ; 8-bit bus! readit movb @>9000,@>8328 ; read byte from synth into CPU RAM src r4, 12 ; 12 microseconds delay (according to Willsy) rt ; now 8-bit bus is free, so return CHECK ;initialization for writing the readit routine to 16-bit RAM li r1, >8330 ; address where to put reading code li r2, readit ; address where to copy reading code from li r3, 10 ; 10 bytes to copy dr2 mov *r2+,*r1+ ; copy a word of code into CPU RAM dect r3 ; decrement r3 by two (?!) jh dr2 ; copy more words if necessary ; here comes the actual checking code clr @PHROM LOAD mov @PHROM, R0 ;Address to load li r2, 4 ;Four nybbles to load LOADLP src R0, 4 ;Start with least significant nybble mov R0, R1 src R1, 4 andi R1, >0F00 ;get only particular nybble ori R1, >4000 ; Put in >4X00 format movb R1, @>9400 ;Write the nybble dec R2 jne LOADLP li R1, >4000 movb R1, @>9400 ;Write the fifth nybble ;Delay of 42 microseconds li R1, 10 DLY dec R1 jne DLY movb @H10, @>9400 ;Write command for reading src R1, 12 ;delay of 12 microseconds bl @>8330 ;read status byte cb @>8328,@HAA ;is it >AA? jeq SPEAK jne NOSPEECH I hope this is clear enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+retroclouds Posted March 27, 2012 Author Share Posted March 27, 2012 (edited) Retroclouds, Do you develop on real hardware, or emulation? I know what you mean about it taking up too much time. I've thought about quitting too, but, this is my hobby and I stubbornly refuse to quit, even when I catch flak from she-that-must-be-obeyed. My argument is that I don't drink, I don't smoke, and I don't go out whoring. She knows where I am. I'm on the sofa with the classic99 debugger open! Want me to quit? Fine. I like stock-car racing. I'll take that up as an (expensive) hobby, and combine it with the above three hobbies! :-) I develop on emulation only. Unfortunately the project is stalled for now, but not given up. For the last 6 months I have been doing a lot of learning for a certification I need at work. I still have one more test to do and then I'm done, So that should give me some more spare time. Also my father passed away 2 months ago after being ill for more than a year. (He's the one who got me into the TI-99/4A when I was about 8 years old). So I had quite a tough time lately. Anyway, I'm confident that 2012 will be a better year and I will be able to finish Tutankham. If not this year then in 2013 Edited March 27, 2012 by retroclouds 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willsy Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 I hear ya bud. Very sorry to hear about your father. Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+retroclouds Posted June 3, 2012 Author Share Posted June 3, 2012 (edited) Today is the first time I took a look at Tutankham in a very long time. Nothing fancy, for now I just want to get a "feeling" for it again. Kinda weird looking at my TMS9900 source after such a long time though. I'm very happy that I did a good job commenting my source code. Guess this is more true for assembly language as for any other (high-level) language. Also played with the sprite graphics today. Originally I started with the colecovision sprites. When you are moving right you have 2 frames with 2 (16x16) sprites each. That'll change now. I now have graphics basically containing of 6 frames of 3 (16x16) sprites each. To avoid a flicker fest I'll be replacing one sprite with background graphics, while still keeping 3 colors. Here's how it'll look like: EDIT: I know, the image looks awfully small when you view it in a browser. Haven't figured out how I can make it look bigger. But it looks dammed crisp on the TI-99/4A Edited June 3, 2012 by retroclouds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OLD CS1 Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 How about this? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocky007 Posted June 3, 2012 Share Posted June 3, 2012 it looks a lot better than the one in the beta video ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.