Cebus Capucinis Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 I always liked Jawbreaker better than Jawbreaker 2. Jawbreaker at least has some minor differences from Pac-Man that make it quite a bit of fun to play. Jawbreaker 2 was essentially just Pac-Man; I wonder if anyone is getting those two mixed up? In the first one it's the little lines that you go up and down, constantly moving with the 'openings' or 'doors' you travel through -- the second one is just the Pac-esque maze. It took me quite a while to find a Jawbreaker in a lot, so I'd say Zwackery is right on the money -- I'd pay up to $12 for one but not more than that. Give it a shot, plug it in and play, you might find that you want to keep it anyway! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetset Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Well ya for the record, Jawbreaker is a great game. It *is* different from PacMan in many respects, but it is also just as similar. TBH, knock-off may have been too stron a word...I prefer clone myself. Just because it is a clone or knockoff or whatever you want to call it doesn't mean it's a bad game. And ya I know on the 8bit line JB2 is DEFINITELY a pacman knockoff. At least JB1 is slightly different but really, the concept, and the object of the game are exactly the same. The one critical difference is that instead of a maze with 4 power ups, you've got only one power up and horizontal lines instead of a maze. IMO thats like saying KC Munchkin is not a clone of PacMan because the dots move and the ghosts have antennae. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nukey Shay Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 Jawbreaker on home computers uses Pac-Man's maze (and subsequently attracted Atari's lawyers). Jawbreaker II and 2600's Jawbreaker use only horizontal corridors. Both were created after the initial clone game. I don't know if the main difference of lacking a maze was done primarily because of the relative difficulty of implementing such a playfield on the 2600's hardware...or because they were trying to avoid any further legal entanglements. One of the key elements in the original case was that Atari hadn't yet released a port of their own. http://www.davis.ca/en/blog/Video-Game-Law/1981/12/28/Pac-Man-V-Jawbreaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cebus Capucinis Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 I'm more familiar with the A8 versions then, apparently. I never knew -- I thought Jawbreaker 2 was the same! So 2600 Jawbreaker is equivalent to Jawbreaker 2 on A8. I agree with what jetset is saying -- it's true that there are differences but there are enough similarities. It's a good game but it's definitely in the same 'room' as Pac-Man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nukey Shay Posted May 19, 2010 Share Posted May 19, 2010 I remember an advert for the original game that went something like "Jawbreaker brings you the excitement of an arcade game whose name we can't mention." in a Crutchfield catalog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy Climber Posted May 20, 2010 Share Posted May 20, 2010 What's the problem? Really? Here is a perfect example where crap like this leads: http://www.atariage....an-9-press-kit/ Giving Ceb, an Atomic Wedgie at CGE Yes, crapping on peoples for sale topics leads to Atomic wedgies! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.