Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Flojomojo

Fun with Arcade vs. 2600 screen shots!

Recommended Posts

The most famous awful example.

 

That could actually pass for a 5200 vs. 2600 screen shot. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Only if you were squash it into a horizontal configuration.  That aspect of the 5200 really bugged me --- then and now.

 

I know what you mean, but given how much more it looks, sounds, and PLAYS like the original compared to the 2600 version, it's still a quantum leap ahead. And for the best home version ever, I'll probably stick to the Commodore 64 anyway. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gunfight looks very cool, Manuel, thanks for the advertising! :D The official page link from the AtariAge entry seems to be down though. What's up? I want to play this now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gunfight looks very cool, Manuel, thanks for the advertising!   :D   The official page link from the AtariAge entry seems to be down though.  What's up?  I want to play this now.

 

I'm not sure what you mean, as it just came up fine for me:

 

AtariAge Gunfight Entry

 

Can you tell me how you were having problems? Thanks!

 

..Al

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok while we're one going on the more obscure ones. Here's a couple :)

 

Espial

s_Espial_a.png wEspial.png

Reactor

s_Reactor_1.png wReactor.png

Springer

s_Springer_1.png wSpringer.png

Roc' n Rope

s_RocNRope_5.png wRoc

Strategy X

s_StrategyX_2.png wStrategy_X.png

Up 'n Down

s_UpNDown_2.png wUp

Omega Race

s_OmegaRace_3.png xOmega_Race.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa, you got me beat for obscurity. I thought Amidar was pretty mainstream (Reactor too! I loved that one). Espial looks cool for a VCS game. Gotta try that one. How did you get the screenshots lined up like that? Edited 2 into 1, I presume?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Twenty years ago, did you imagine that games could look this good? We were saying things like "video refresh rate would never support that kind of detail."

post-2410-1038852863.png

post-2410-1038852863.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...