IntellivisionDude #1 Posted February 10, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgA9uchdHtk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IntellivisionDude #2 Posted February 10, 2013 And to throw more fuel on the fire. And i may have been too generous calling it a tie in Bowling. I can't help it that i like the simple 2600 bowling. lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IntellivisionDude #3 Posted February 10, 2013 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rev #4 Posted February 10, 2013 I want two minutes of my life back please. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IntellivisionDude #5 Posted February 10, 2013 I want two minutes of my life back please. Blame Voltron. I didn't make the video. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OldSchoolRetroGamer #6 Posted February 10, 2013 Next up, NES VS SuperNES.............really why bother lol!? Apple's and Oranges, Cat's and Dog's. To each their own. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IntellivisionDude #7 Posted February 10, 2013 Next up, NES VS SuperNES.............really why bother lol!? Apple's and Oranges, Cat's and Dog's. To each their own. For fun? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+Gemintronic #8 Posted February 10, 2013 I dun geddit. Plimpton said it was better. It came out later than the 2600 so the graphics are better. What's funny about that? Thems the facts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IntellivisionDude #9 Posted February 10, 2013 I dun geddit. Plimpton said it was better. It came out later than the 2600 so the graphics are better. What's funny about that? Thems the facts. Think of it like a sport like the Super Bowl or the Olympics. Does it matter who wins? It's the spirit of the competition. Or better yet think of it like Battle of the Network Stars. Which Celebrity had the best body. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+doctorclu #10 Posted February 10, 2013 Intellivision is CLEARLY superior in graphics, but Atari was able to crank out the games, many of them with high replay value. And Atari was cheaper. This is ok, as Atari would get this in reverse with the Jaguar. The Jaguar is CLEARLY superior in graphics, but Sega and Nintendo was able to crank out the games, many of them with high replay value. And Sega and Nintendo were cheaper. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voltron #11 Posted February 13, 2013 Intellivisionleaf the guy formerly known as atarileaf is in a process of conversion. Lets all in the brotherhood help him. He is a victim of a bad gaming system known as (you know what goes here) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites