Jump to content
IGNORED

XF351 for sale on ebay


bob1200xl

Recommended Posts

I have an SF354 I can look at tonight. I'll open her up and report back.

 

OK - is this an SF354 mechanism? I assumed that the ST used regular 34-pin drives. Maybe not? The XF351 drive has a single row of interface pins and what looks like a standard power connector. It is also thicker than a regular 3.5.

 

Bob

 

attachicon.gifDSC01422.JPG

 

attachicon.gifDSC01423.JPG

 

attachicon.gifDSC01424.JPG

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not doubting you, since you own one of these, but this suggests that it is the same mechanism as the SF354.

 

http://firewi.com/ahs/xf351.html

 

 

In the quoted site kind of infers that the unit is a 1.44MB, but obviously its not. Assuming it is the same mechanism as the SF354 it's single sided 360KB. Apparently these units were very similar in operation to the XF551... so it stands to reason that DOS XE would have been the goto DOS. A double sided version would have been much more useful... the other thing that is incorrect about 1.44MB is that 1.44 MB diskettes and drives were introduced sometime in 1987... and the XF351 developed in 1986 (doesn't the ROM chip have 1986 written on it)?

Edited by bbking67
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In the quoted site kind of infers that the unit is a 1.44MB, but obviously its not. Assuming it is the same mechanism as the SF354 it's single sided 360KB. Apparently these units were very similar in operation to the XF551... so it stands to reason that DOS XE would have been the goto DOS. A double sided version would have been much more useful... the other thing that is incorrect about 1.44MB is that 1.44 MB diskettes and drives were introduced sometime in 1987... and the XF351 developed in 1986 (doesn't the ROM chip have 1986 written on it)?

 

Although 1.44MB capacity is mentioned with reference to 3.5" floppies in general, the article infers to me that the XF351 unit was 720KB DS/DD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only been aware of a 360 and 720 official version of XF3..... that being said my xf551 were updated to 1.4... the bad news..... low density disks all survived the sands of time and worked... the high 1.4 ones over 75% failed after 21 years.... that made bbs back ups useless for reconstruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.44MB floppies are rubbish, IMO. But like I say: that article doesn't suggest for a moment that there was ever a 1.44MB Atari floppy drive. The XF551 mod sounds pretty interesting, though. I didn't even realize this was possible. I'll stick at 720KB, though. :)

Edited by flashjazzcat
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The XF551 mod is complicated by the less than robust PCB that Atari put out. Otherwise, it is pretty simple.

 

Some AA member got one of the first XF551s and had a 3.5 in there as soon at he got it open. ( I guess he violated the warranty...) He had to write (in BASIC, no less) an 8040 dis-assembler so he could alter a couple of parameters. That was all it needed.

 

I have hundreds of 720K, 3.5 8-bit disks. Works great.

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

In the quoted site kind of infers that the unit is a 1.44MB, but obviously its not. Assuming it is the same mechanism as the SF354 it's single sided 360KB. Apparently these units were very similar in operation to the XF551... so it stands to reason that DOS XE would have been the goto DOS. A double sided version would have been much more useful... the other thing that is incorrect about 1.44MB is that 1.44 MB diskettes and drives were introduced sometime in 1987... and the XF351 developed in 1986 (doesn't the ROM chip have 1986 written on it)?

That's a scary thought DOS XE, I've toyed with DOS XE it's pain just to move files over to DOS XE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Jon

 

Someone needs to clone that controller board so we can mod our otherwise useless ST floppy drives. :)

 

Dropcheck?

 

Sincerely

 

Mathy

 

PS I read on her site that's she's back in business. And she could add the second SIO port.

Edited by Mathy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...