G-type #4026 Posted March 1, 2016 Yea, I don't agree with all this "guilty by association" chatter. I think its pretty easy to see the associated software developers could be led to believe that this was a legitimate enterprise. Demanding for their apologies is ridiculous. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DerekRumpler #4027 Posted March 1, 2016 I think Gamester81 needs to do the same thing. Apologize and pull all "support" (like Sydney Hunter is really gonna appear on a capture card)... this whole debacle makes CollectorVision look bad. I won't even support the SNES/Genesis versions of this game if John Lester continues to promote and defend Mike Kennedy. I'm hoping he is deceived since Gamester81 is one of my favorite YouTube channels. He seems like the type to do the right thing (although given this thread, who even knows if you can trust anyone anymore). 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DerekRumpler #4028 Posted March 1, 2016 Aware me on this. I haven't seen where CollectorVision was rushing to the defense of this project. I may have missed something but from what I did see they seemed pretty neutral. Nope. Coleco Holdings is also lying (or they are unwillingly deceived). https://twitter.com/colecovision_/status/700438168353509376 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thierry Henry #4029 Posted March 1, 2016 I think Gamester81 needs to do the same thing. Apologize and pull all "support" (like Sydney Hunter is really gonna appear on a capture card)... this whole debacle makes CollectorVision look bad. I won't even support the SNES/Genesis versions of this game if John Lester continues to promote and defend Mike Kennedy. Not this particular incarnation of the project, but I seem to recall a podcast (not sure if it's still up) where he (Gamester) and a couple of his pals (Pete Dorr, etc) were going on and on about how Mike was being treated very harshly (especially by the folks on Atari Age) and that to them (Gamester, etc) it seemed that people wanted this project to fail even before it had the chance to really get off the ground. As I recall, they sure seemed intent on belaboring that point. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DerekRumpler #4030 Posted March 1, 2016 Maybe it is real, but we cannot see it? Its a Chameleon after all! As I said on Twitter, it is the Chameleon because it can morph into any needed device, duh. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
galax #4031 Posted March 1, 2016 Yea, I don't agree with all this "guilty by association" chatter. I think its pretty easy to see the associated software developers could be led to believe that this was a legitimate enterprise. Demanding for their apologies is ridiculous. It will be quite interesting to hear their side of the story. Maybe other people have been put on the phone with Mike's mysterious team of hardware gurus to convince them that there is development going on? If a person who you like and trust gives you his word that he has a real product and is not lying, it puts you in a difficult position- to either side with him and maintain the friendship or call him out and sever all ties. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cybercylon #4032 Posted March 1, 2016 I'll just leave this here... I am not caught up with posts, but my family room had a pile of old computer stuff like that. Too bad I didn't keep it and I don't have a clear jaguar shell. I could have made all sorts of prototypes by now. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
galax #4033 Posted March 1, 2016 I especially hated the Jaguar case and the carts, called them a "poisoned chalice" if I recall. Manufacturing the Jag case is literally the only thing Mike has actually achieved in the last year. Take that away and he's only left with plagiarized electronics, black tape, and a 5mm through-hole power LED. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RupanIII #4034 Posted March 1, 2016 Collectorvision 11 hrs · Regarding the Coleco Chameleon system: We have remained quiet overall regarding this system, and there has been plenty of excitement as well as drama surrounding it. We have been in talks with their team about porting some of our games over to the Chameleon, but we are not a part of the development team behind this project. We anticipate seeing a video of a working prototype of the system running what they advertise soon, but until then, we will continue to focus on creating and porting our games to other platforms. We're not affiliated or endorsed by the Coleco Chameleon, and we're not going to release our games for the Chameleon, until we have a working prototype in our hands. That came out last night when the entire debacle exploded. lol. 10 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newsdee #4035 Posted March 1, 2016 Now I'm wondering what will be next. "Tomorrow in Retro Land..." 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dj_convoy #4036 Posted March 1, 2016 That came out last night when the entire debacle exploded. lol. They've definitely remained quiet: Quote Jean-François Dupuis: No matter what people says, the Chameleon is REAL! Once you'll see their Kickstarter, you'll change your mindThe Chameleon is a whole lot different than what the RetroVGS wasNow, need proofs? Be patient, you'll soon have it Quote Jean-François Dupuis: Let's just say this..... I know what tons of people wants to know Thing is I'm under NDA , so I just can't reveal anythingYou'll probably all get your answers this week 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RupanIII #4037 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) sorry, the site wasn't loading. my last post did make it, yay Edited March 1, 2016 by RupanIII Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jaybird3rd #4038 Posted March 1, 2016 Yea, I don't agree with all this "guilty by association" chatter. I think its pretty easy to see the associated software developers could be led to believe that this was a legitimate enterprise. Demanding for their apologies is ridiculous. I can understand being honestly fooled; after all, if you're a developer of indie games and someone comes to you expressing interest in licensing your games for a new platform, I think most of us would probably be willing to explore the prospect and to take the person at their word until or unless we were given a good reason not to. I think this is what happened with groups like Piko Interactive and Intellivision Productions, so as far as I can tell, they've done nothing wrong. What I don't understand is digging in and insisting that the new platform is real and that the critics are wrong to question it, even after being presented with compelling evidence to the contrary, all while hiding behind an NDA. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kittybot #4039 Posted March 1, 2016 Aware me on this. I haven't seen where CollectorVision was rushing to the defense of this project. I may have missed something but from what I did see they seemed pretty neutral. In conversations on FB John Lester defended them, saying that people are speculating, to trust him and that everything will be revealed on KS... blah, blah, blah. I enjoy his channel and sincerely feel that he has been a victim of this con as well. Just the fact that the Coleco Chameleon logo is on ads for his upcoming game could be damaging to his brand. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+GoldenWheels #4040 Posted March 1, 2016 Reading the last 5 pages only makes me wish I had been following this more closely all along. What a debacle. There's at least one lesson to be learned I guess...don't use transparent shells on "prototypes" that are full of ..... 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gnarlynick #4041 Posted March 1, 2016 I wonder how many collectible colors the capture card PCB will be available in.... 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+phoenixdownita #4042 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) ... There's at least one lesson to be learned I guess...don't use transparent shells on "prototypes" that are full of ..... No no, the lesson is "Don't say you have a prototype when you have NONE, especially not THREE FUXXING TIMES IN A ROW" I really want to hear the "mouthpiece". BTW I agree that Piko should not be guilty by association but the rest of their team: Steve Woita, Paul Wylie, Phil Adam, Ben Herman, Steven J. Rosenbaum are all guilty until proven innocent. I don't care if you are friend with one of them and they are "wonderful" people, their not addressing the issue at all is guilty. I don't even care what stance they would have taken: defend or come-out, either way it would have shown they are at least aware of what is going on and they either drink the kool-aid or they don't. Their silence makes me believe they are useless puppets. As such guilty of being useless. Edited March 1, 2016 by phoenixdownita 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillyman #4043 Posted March 1, 2016 After the PC card picture in the translucent Jag case, I will not be supporting anything that has Mikes name attached to it. This is beyond unacceptable. Once my personal subscription to RETRO runs out, I will not be renewing. I have also removed the RETRO magazine subscribe link from the front page of Retromags.com (where it has been for over a year). Mike is also no longer welcome to promote any of his products over at RM. The money earmarked for the Coleco Chameleon, was redistributed to Sinclair ZX Spectrum Vega Plus, which is not crammed into an Atari Lynx shell and has over 1,000 licensed games on board. 19 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Raticon #4044 Posted March 1, 2016 So both Piko and Collectorvision are prepared to develop/port games for the console if it become a success? Since these two are the only developers that had had games announced previously besides the CV and Inty compilations what exactly will make this console a success if all devs are waiting for it to become a success before developing for it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+phoenixdownita #4045 Posted March 1, 2016 So both Piko and Collectorvision are prepared to develop/port games for the console if it become a success? Since these two are the only developers that had had games announced previously besides the CV and Inty compilations what exactly will make this console a success if all devs are waiting for it to become a success before developing for it? Don't worry, there's no console. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+GoldenWheels #4046 Posted March 1, 2016 No no, the lesson is "Don't say you have a prototype when you have NONE, especially not THREE FUXXING TIMES IN A ROW" understood, but in my experience you can't teach dishonest people to be honest. Baby steps. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PlaysWithWolves #4047 Posted March 1, 2016 Gamester81 has shilled for RVGS & Chameleon and since deleted the relevant YouTube videos. Collectorvision was hand-in-hand with RVGS, as one of their titles (The Adventures of Tiny Knight) was to be the RVGS bundled game and RVGS-exclusive for something like six months or a year after release. I wrote a synopsis of some of his RVGS shilling and calling AtariAge members "toxic" in a single podcast alone. If you follow the links, that podcast still can be heard(~1:26:xx). Judge for yourself. While he was certainly more cautious this time around, I think you guys may be letting him off easy when he doesn't deserve it. 12 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+5-11under #4048 Posted March 1, 2016 Yep, that's why I finally jumped in and subscribed, as my way of saying thanks to Albert for providing such a great resource: http://atariage.com/forums/page/subscriptions- I can't imagine how much bandwidth I've used in the last few months just hitting reload when this thread catches fire. Ditto. Immense fun for pennies an hour. 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
+GoldenWheels #4049 Posted March 1, 2016 Gamester81 has shilled.... I, for one, am shocked. 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Janus #4050 Posted March 1, 2016 Why is it no one slammed Xbox when they added DVR to their xbox one? Just wait until the Chameleon comes out - then you can pass judgement. 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites