Jump to content
IGNORED

CO60472 Delay Line


Philsan

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

I've made a bit of a rework of the little board and I had some PCB's made. It works perfectly and fits nicely in a 600XL. Should also fit in an 800XL without problems. I've managed to put everything on top of the PCB, so no bending of pins necessary. It does require good soldering skills, because of the SMD stuff, but the IC is easy to solder. When assembled it's basically a plug 'n play solution. I will put this soon on my Tindie store for sale if people are interested.

Delay Line.png

IMG_20201123_210550_2.jpg

IMG_20201123_210650_4.jpg

IMG_20201123_210745.jpg

Edited by redhawk668
  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, blacka013 said:

Hi Redhawk,

 

what's the internet address for your store?

 

Regards

This is the address of my store: https://www.tindie.com/stores/redhawk6682020/ Keep an eye on it, will be available soon. The PCB that will go on sale will be ENIG finish and fully SMD. Rev. A design works, but 0.6mm PCB's are a bit pricey, the Rev. B will be fully SMD and will go on sale in my Tindie store soon.

Edited by redhawk668
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, Rev. B of the Delay Line. Now fully SMD. Can be made with standard PCB thickness of 1.6mm, so cheaper to manufacture and could be made with a pick and place machine. The IC is in TSSOP-14 package, just fits between a DIP footprint rotated 90 degrees. Board is routed. Now, I need to order some of them for testing. When succesful I can put them on sale at my Tindie store.

Delay Line.png

Edited by redhawk668
  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the passive components are 0603 footprint. That is still solderable by hand, I’ve tried to fit it all within the DIP footprint, but that means I have to switch to smaller footprints for the passives, it also needs space for the routing of the tracks. So, this design is the best compromise IMHO. This can still be soldered by hand, so kits could be possible too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there is a way to keep the DIP footprint, put some of the components on the bottom (second layer) of the PCB. So, IC on top with the resistors and the capacitors on the bottom. I'm using machine header pins, so there is clearance between the socket and the PCB. Then, it all should fit within the DIP footprint. That'll be Rev. C.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2020 at 3:43 PM, redhawk668 said:

I've made a bit of a rework of the little board and I had some PCB's made. It works perfectly and fits nicely in a 600XL. Should also fit in an 800XL without problems. I've managed to put everything on top of the PCB, so no bending of pins necessary. It does require good soldering skills, because of the SMD stuff, but the IC is easy to solder. When assembled it's basically a plug 'n play solution. I will put this soon on my Tindie store for sale if people are interested.

Could you explain why this design (with the 74ls chip on top) solves the problem of bending pins? I got lost with that...  I still see pins from the 74ls that shouldn't connect with the Atari socket, right?

Probably I am misunderstanding....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ChildOfCv said:

The same pins.  4 connects to 4, 6 to 6, etc.  7 and 14 also need to connect to 7 and 14.

Thank you very much! Tonight i'll heat up the soldering iron ... 

Hope I can bring my dead XL back to life with this circuit. He has an broken delay line. I checked it with a working delay line from one of my other XL's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, manterola said:

Could you explain why this design (with the 74ls chip on top) solves the problem of bending pins? I got lost with that...  I still see pins from the 74ls that shouldn't connect with the Atari socket, right?

Probably I am misunderstanding....

All of the SMD components are soldered on top of the little board, with the 74LS on top of the PC, you can stick it in and solder it to the PCB. My first draft was a little PCB that was piggybacked on top of the IC. That means you have to bend the needed pins upwards with all risks of breaking them. The only drawback of Rev. A is, you need a really thin PCB, like 0.6 mm to have the pins sticking out far enough. My new Rev. C is a 2 layer PCB with a TSSOP-14 IC + resistors on top and the capicators on the bottom. As this uses header pins to insert it in the socket, the PCB can be normal thickness. It also fits within the DIP-14 footprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, it makes sense now. However,  the fact that pins from the 74ls chip go to positions in the socket that the original delay line doesn't even use (the original lack some pins), confused me. I guess it doesn't matter because because those sockets pins are not connected to anything in the motherboard. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...