retrocanada76 #1 Posted September 1, 2016 Hi, I noticed the 800 XL stock rom has the $D000-$D7FF range filled with data. What is that ? Wasn't it supposed to be hardware registers ? Or is the Antic on 800XL able to see this ROM and this is in fact the charset ? The bytes in there indeed look like bitmapped data. How does this work ? What if you switch to OSRAM ? Thxs Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phaeron #2 Posted September 1, 2016 It's the self-test ROM. The MMU maps that section of the ROM to $5000-57FF. Note the coincidence between the addresses. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rybags #3 Posted September 1, 2016 Switch to "OSRAM" in fact disables the Self-Test regardless of it's setting. Some people (xxl?) have modified their machines to allow the normally inaccessable 2K of Ram to appear at $5000 when PORTB bit 7 and 0 are both 0. That is achieved by use of a custom made MMU replacement and extra modification to allow A15 to be forced low (?) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xxl #4 Posted September 1, 2016 yes... there is 2K extra ram available also. http://xxl.atari.pl/mapram/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mathy #5 Posted September 1, 2016 Hello xxl Could you please translate the text in that link to English? Google does a fairly good job, but it's not quite good enough. Sincerely Mathy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xxl #6 Posted September 2, 2016 not used bit combination 0x11xxx0 disables the ROM, RAM from $D000-$D7FF enables at the $5000-$57FF. MapRAM does not affect memory expansion, you can have memory expansion (or standard 64K Atari without memory expansion) and MapRAM together. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
flashjazzcat #7 Posted September 2, 2016 One exception: Ultimate 1MB, which already uses parts of the MapRAM area for the partition table. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mathy #8 Posted September 2, 2016 Hello xxl And this doesn't have any negativ side effects? Sincerely Mathy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xxl #9 Posted September 3, 2016 And this doesn't have any negativ side effects? I did not notice any problems Ultimate 1MB, which already uses parts of the MapRAM area for the partition table. u1mb modification is not only an memory extension. partition table is not related to mem exp. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites