Jump to content
majestyx

TI's (somewhat) revisionist history

Recommended Posts

I found this on TI's own website:

 

http://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/thinkinnovate/archive/2013/12/01/these-ti-toys-remind-us-why-we-re-all-kids-at-heart

 

The part I found amusing was the info posted about the 4A:

 

"The 1980s marked the first time anyone could consider a computer as a toy. Until then, computers graced the campuses of universities and technical companies, but a computer at home was a rare luxury. In 1981, TI introduced the 99/4A, the first 16-bit personal computer designed to out-perform other 8-bit computers in the market. Equipped with a 13-inch video color monitor, it used plastic plug-in modules of read-only memory containing games like Donkey Kong, Frogger and TI Invaders. Other plug-in modules could be used for personal finance and educational programs."

 

Let's see, did it REALLY out-perform other 8-bit computers in the market? And wasn't the TI-99/4 actually their first one with a 16-bit processor?

 

Was it really equipped with a 13-inch video color monitor? Sure, if you felt like paying $399.95 retail for it (based on TI's June-December 1982 Suggested Retail Price List)

 

And irony of ironies - DONKEY KONG? You mean, by Atarisoft, the company whose cartridges you redesigned the computer to lock out?!

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this on TI's own website:

 

http://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/thinkinnovate/archive/2013/12/01/these-ti-toys-remind-us-why-we-re-all-kids-at-heart

 

Let's see, did it REALLY out-perform other 8-bit computers in the market? And wasn't the TI-99/4 actually their first one with a 16-bit processor?

 

Was it really equipped with a 13-inch video color monitor? Sure, if you felt like paying $399.95 retail for it (based on TI's June-December 1982 Suggested Retail Price List)

 

And irony of ironies - DONKEY KONG? You mean, by Atarisoft, the company whose cartridges you redesigned the computer to lock out?!

 

 

That was a good find! -- I wonder if the person writing it only read from early marketing manuals as their 'official reference'.

 

gallery_35324_1027_8793.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't recall a 13" TI branded monitor... but Wikipedia even lists it as a rebadged Zenith. Is that true? Must be extremely rare then as I've only ever seen the boxy 10" version. That was a 10" screen, wasn't it? Right? lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 13 incher came with the /4. Looked like a tv with no channel knob.

So the /4 has the larger monitor, while the /4A had the 10"? Makes sense, not! :lol:

 

Wow, never ever saw the 13" Zenith model in all this time. Had the Panasonic 10" for a while, but really - way to small to take seriously. Didnt use it for long before selling. Might be cool for collecting purposes, but that's about it IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed, the price list has it as a 10" monitor, but the price I mentioned is accurate. Weird that they'd reduce the size on the machine that came later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They only included the Zenith monitor because they couldn't get the FCC to pass their RF modulator in time for the /4's release...

 

...and let's face it, we got a 16bit processor, not to "outperform" other 8 bit computers (which we also know, for the most part, it didn't) but because the 8 bit CPU that was meant for the /4 didn't work, and by the time the 4A re-design took place, TI's marketing department was already beholden to a 16 bit selling-feature strategy (I often wonder if the re-vamped 4A would have been a better performer had they replaced the 16 bit processor with an 8 bit for which the architecture was originally designed..

 

Won't be the first time I've read articles which confuse the /4 and the /4A's history..

 

Finally, maybe I'm wrong, but didn't Atarisoft titles (such as Donkey Kong) appear shortly before the 4A was discontinued?? The blurb suggests it was among the early "plug-in plastic modules".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this has been mentioned before, but the back of the TI software boxes makes sure to specifically mention how they are not 'cartridges', lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TI made a PC Clone and had to withdraw it from the market. It did smoke the PC at the time on performance and specs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TI made a PC Clone and had to withdraw it from the market. It did smoke the PC at the time on performance and specs.

 

The TI-PC was a very popular PC clone here, and in fact both the floppy disk access and the video (similar to EGA) blow the IBM out of the water. I used it with compiled basic programs and when finally used the same program in a IBM PC it took AGES to read and write the same info from a diskette compared to the Ti-PC (not to mention the screen was monochromatic)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And of course, they weren't joysticks (and most TI game players would agree with that), they were "Wired Remote Controllers," a term which even as a kid made me laugh.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm not mistaken, the 10" monitor is usually regarded as having a superior picture. Bigger doesn't always mean better.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm not mistaken, the 10" monitor is usually regarded as having a superior picture. Bigger doesn't always mean better.

 

I have one of each, and the 10" monitor is better by far.

 

As for TI's revisionist history, it's more likely that this is not intentionally wrong, but that the author, probably someone under 30, was a marketing person who has little understanding about the topic.

 

I am grateful they settled on Solid State Software though. Tubes would have been awkward.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am grateful they settled on Solid State Software though. Tubes would have been awkward.

 

...and as an under 30-something person would say today... "I know, right"? :lol:

 

 

 

 

post-13896-0-97128100-1493812595.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, tube would have really been awkward! That would be a rather large interface challenge... and make Doc Brown's gadget here look small by comparison!

 

Let's see each valve (tube) representing one transistor, multiply that by a minimum of 8000 for an average TI era cartridge.

You would also have to consider power supply requirements, a cooling solution, isolation and interface issues, and the list goes on!

 

03.jpg

 

What a freaking nightmare scenario!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TI made a PC Clone and had to withdraw it from the market. It did smoke the PC at the time on performance and specs.

Why did they have to withdraw it from the market? Were they infringing on patents, or was it a dud on the marketplace? There isn't a lot of information out there about this computer. I remember the ads for it - "Dare to compare."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, tube would have really been awkward! That would be a rather large interface challenge... and make Doc Brown's gadget here look small by comparison!

 

Let's see each valve (tube) representing one transistor, multiply that by a minimum of 8000 for an average TI era cartridge.

You would also have to consider power supply requirements, a cooling solution, isolation and interface issues, and the list goes on!

 

03.jpg

 

What a freaking nightmare scenario!

 

" power supply requirements"

 

That's easy - 1.21 JigaWatts! (sp)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did they have to withdraw it from the market? Were they infringing on patents, or was it a dud on the marketplace? There isn't a lot of information out there about this computer. I remember the ads for it - "Dare to compare."

Infringement on Intel as they used same Microcode as Intel used on Intel CPU.

 

It was embarrassing for Intel also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Infringement on Intel as they used same Microcode as Intel used on Intel CPU.

 

It was embarrassing for Intel also.

 

also it had a bad rep for compatibility with 3rd party cards mostly due to irq standards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the TI PC used an Intel chip for the CPU. The machine did not sell well outside of some technical circles and died a slow death of attrition. It did have one of the best speech recognition boards of the time period though. . .along with some interesting non-standard graphics boards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll bet a round of beers that the person that wrote that history piece want even born when the TI was a thing.

Edited by Willsy
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...