Jump to content
IGNORED

New Atari Console that Ataribox?


Goochman

Recommended Posts

It's a tricky one. I guess the best option for the Gameband backers would be to get a lawyer to take on a class action case on a no win no pay basis. But since they said the money is gone, that's going to be very hard to get a lawyer that would do that.

They would need some evidence that the Gameband team either lied about there being no money, or there was evidence of fraud so they could to go after the Gameband CEO personnaly to retrieve cash.

 

The situation sucks. This reminds me of the Peachy printer campaign where they flat out came out and said that one of the team members stole a huge chunk of backers money - $320K. And yet nothing happened. At least not to date and it's been years.

 

 

Actually when one considers they may well have an actionable case for conspiracy to defraud, the best thing they could do is contact the DA for the state of jurisdiction and file a formal criminal complaint. The fact that it was a Kickstarter does not relieve Fergie of fraud liability when he did not comply with the terms of the service agreements. Those are an actual contract despite it being click through crap. You know the software companies enforce their click through (never read) terms all the time. Economic and white collar crimes such as state tax fraud, check kiting, and consumer fraud can be prosecuted in state court. It doesn't matter if the jack-weed actually has any money remaining or not. If the DA finds sufficient evidence of fraud, he would be held liable and subject to financial penalties or jail time.

 

https://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/news/local/GoFundMe-Homeless-Veteran-John-Bobbitt-Hearing-501535691.html

 

 

Thanks, I figured it was an Ipad setting but nothing I found made sense.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually when one considers they may well have an actionable case for conspiracy to defraud ...

 

I kinda doubt it, especially when everyone involved in IGG ("entrepreneurs" and "backers" alike) enter into the contract from here when using the site. That doesn't mean someone couldn't sue them successfully, but the Ataribox fans don't seem like they have the resources to pull off that kind of thing.

 

Bold highlights are mine.

 

INDIEGOGO HAS NO FIDUCIARY DUTY TO ANY USER. THE SERVICES, INDIEGOGO CONTENT, USER CONTENT, AND ANY OTHER MATERIALS MADE AVAILABLE OR THROUGH THE USE OF THE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" AND "AS AVAILABLE" BASIS WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT OR COURSE OF PERFORMANCE. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMISSIBLE PURSUANT TO APPLICABLE LAW, INDIEGOGO AND ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SUPPLIERS, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AGENTS, DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF TITLE, NON- INFRINGEMENT, ACCURACY, MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND ANY WARRANTIES THAT MAY ARISE FROM COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF PERFORMANCE OR USAGE OF TRADE. INDIEGOGO AND ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SUPPLIERS, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS AND AGENTS DO NOT WARRANT THAT YOUR USE OF THE SERVICES WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, ERROR-FREE OR SECURE, THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED, OR THAT THE SERVICES OR THE SERVER(S) ON WHICH THE SERVICES ARE HOSTED, OR ANY SERVICES AVAILABLE ON ANY THIRD PARTY PLATFORM ARE FREE OF VIRUSES OR OTHER HARMFUL COMPONENTS. NO OPINION, ADVICE OR STATEMENT OF INDIEGOGO OR ITS AFFILIATES, LICENSORS, SUPPLIERS, ADVERTISERS, SPONSORS, AGENTS, MEMBERS OR VISITORS, WHETHER MADE THROUGH THE USE OF THE SERVICES, OR ON THIRD PARTY PLATFORMS OR OTHERWISE, SHALL CREATE ANY WARRANTY. YOUR USE OF THE SERVICES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY SERVICES PROVIDED ON ANY THIRD PARTY PLATFORM, ARE ENTIRELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.

Indiegogo does not offer investment advice or analysis, nor does it endorse or recommend investments in any company or the suitability of an investment for any particular investor. Indiegogo is not registered as a broker-dealer or financial or investment advisor and does not provide any services requiring such registration. Indiegogo makes no representation or warrant as to the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of information found anywhere on its website. Any opinions or forecasts expressed herein are only Indiegogo’s and are not intended as investment advice and are subject to change without notice. Information on any of Indiegogo’s websites associated with an issuer offering securities (the “Indiegogo Equity Pages”) are not a solicitation of an offer to buy or an offer to sell any security.

Please be aware that Indiegogo receives fees from companies posted on our website at https://equity.indiegogo.com/and https://ico.indiegogo.com and https://blockchain.indiegogo.com (“ Equity Offering Pages”). Indiegogo receives a standard flat fee as compensation for advertising and marketing and such compensation is not based on the success or size of each company’s offering on the Equity Offering Pages. The compensation shall be due to Indiegogo whether a company’s raise is successful or not.

Indiegogo may choose to compensate outside sources to help market Indiegogo’s business and to receive introductions to possible issuers. Compensation to such parties will not be based on the success or size of any transaction. Fees are not based directly or indirectly, on the purchase or sale of a security offered on or through any of the Indiegogo Equity Pages.

The posting of information on any of the Indiegogo Equity Pages regarding any company should not be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of that company for any purpose whatsoever. Information posed on any of the Indiegogo Equity Pages does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular investor, and each investor should consider whether any investment opportunity is appropriate given their investment objectives and current financial circumstances. Any person considering any investment whatsoever is encouraged to consult with their own investment or financial advisor, tax advisor and/or attorney beforehand.

All investments entail risk. The companies on the Indiegogo Equity Pages are generally small or early stage companies and are subject to risks inherent in investing in any small or early stage company, as well as other risks specific to their business and operations. In addition, securities of these companies may be highly illiquid, requiring that they be held for an indefinite period of time or have a limited market for resale. Therefore, no one should invest in any of these companies unless they have no need for liquidity of their investment and can sustain a total loss of their investment. You should only invest an amount of money that you can afford to lose without changing your lifestyle.

You should thoroughly review the complete offering materials for any investment opportunity, particularly all risk factors, prior to investing in any offering and become familiar with the investor requirements, investment limits and your ability to resell the investment.

By accessing any part of our website, including the Indiegogo Equity Pages, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Copyright © 2018 Indiegogo, Inc. All rights reserved

    • No Warranty
    • Disclaimer of Liability
    1. Use the Services at your own risk. We make no representations about the quality, safety, morality or legality of any Campaign, Perk or Contribution or the truth or accuracy of User Content posted on the Services. We do not guarantee the fulfillment or the performance of any Perks, or that Contributions will be used as described in the Campaign. We do not control or endorse User Content posted on the Site or in any Services and, as such, do not guarantee in any manner the reliability, validity, accuracy or truthfulness of such User Content. Indiegogo is not liable for any damages or losses related to your use of the Services. We do not become involved in disputes between Users, or between Users and any third party relating to the use of the Services.
    2. You release us from all claims. When you use the Services, you release Indiegogo from claims, damages, and demands of every kind - known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, disclosed or undisclosed - arising out of or in any way related to such disputes and the Services. All Content that you access or use through the Services is entirely at your own risk and you are solely responsible for any resulting damage or loss to any party.
    3. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE ENTIRE RISK ARISING OUT OF YOUR ACCESS TO AND USE OF THE SERVICES AND USER CONTENT, AND ANY CONTACT YOU HAVE WITH OTHER USERS OR THIRD PARTIES, WHETHER IN PERSON OR ONLINE, REMAINS WITH YOU. NEITHER INDIEGOGO NOR ANY OTHER PARTY INVOLVED IN CREATING, PRODUCING, OR DELIVERING THE SERVICES WILL BE LIABLE (WHETHER BASED ON WARRANTY, CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), PRODUCT LIABILITY OR ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY, AND WHETHER OR NOT INDIEGOGO HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE, EVEN IF A LIMITED REMEDY SET FORTH HEREIN IS FOUND TO HAVE FAILED OF ITS ESSENTIAL PURPOSE) FOR: (A) ANY INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF DATA OR LOSS OF GOODWILL; (B) SERVICE INTERRUPTION, COMPUTER DAMAGE OR SYSTEM FAILURE; © THE COST OF SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES; (D) ANY DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL OR BODILY INJURY OR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THESE TERMS; (E) THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SERVICES; (F) ANY COMMUNICATIONS OR OTHER INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER USERS OR OTHER PERSONS WITH WHOM YOU COMMUNICATE OR INTERACT AS A RESULT OF YOUR USE OF THE SERVICES; OR (G) YOUR CAMPAIGNS OR CONTRIBUTIONS.

      IN NO EVENT SHALL THE TOTAL, AGGREGATE LIABILITY OF INDIEGOGO AND ITS AFFILIATES AND SUBSIDIARIES, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, ARISING FROM OR RELATING TO THE TERMS, SERVICES, OR USER CONTENT, OR FROM THE USE OF OR INABILITY TO USE THE SERVICES EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF FEES ACTUALLY PAID TO INDIEGOGO BY YOU HEREUNDER, OR ONE HUNDRED US DOLLARS IF NO SUCH PAYMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE, AS APPLICABLE.

      THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DESCRIBED ABOVE SHALL APPLY FULLY TO RESIDENTS OF NEW JERSEY.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-2410-0-11192500-1543586721_thumb.pn

Yeah, it's so stereotypical of all these sham crowd funders that when they are finally called to the carpet to explain their complete inability to communicate about months and months of missed deadlines, their response is always, "There's just this one minor problem we are fine tuning to make things perfect." Then they roll out their new and improved timeline that looks like this......

 

Jan 17, 2018 Launch money grab & announce November release

 

Feb 27, 2018 Funding success

 

April 15, 2018 Silence

 

July 24, 2018 Silence

 

October 15, 2018 More silence

 

November 18, 2018 We're totally on track, just a single minor issue to address then everything is full speed ahead.

 

February 4, 2019 Great news we've updated our timeline.

 

Feb 12, 2019 Prototype complete

Feb 15, 2019 Design validation

Feb 17, 2019 Electrical Validation

Feb 19, 2019 Sign contracts

Feb 22, 2019 Order raw materials

Feb 24, 2019 Ramp up production

Feb 25, 2019 Testing

Feb 26, 2019 Mass production

March 1, 2019 Shipping

As simple as that!

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I kinda doubt it, especially when everyone involved in IGG ("entrepreneurs" and "backers" alike) enter into the contract from here when using the site. That doesn't mean someone couldn't sue them successfully, but the Ataribox fans don't seem like they have the resources to pull off that kind of thing.

 

Bold highlights are mine.

 

 

I'm talking about FMTwo games and Feargal having charges filed against them by the DA based on complaints filed by the backers. The crowdfunding rackets don't enter into it since they just provide the mechanism like a lawyer or accountant. They also know enough to shield themselves from the actual project risks. If the company running the project doesn't comply with the terms of the fundraising mechanism, or pledges to their backers, they can be held liable for consumer fraud. As I've mentioned from the beginning, anytime these "companies" offer a pre-order, as they clearly did, they set themselves up for criminal liability for failure to deliver. A waiver from the crowdfunding site doesn't relieve the sleazy companies or individuals of legal liability.

Edited by JBerel
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate these people but at least their update if true is transparent enough to let the fools know there is an audio issue they are working on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

post-2410-0-11192500-1543586721_thumb.pn

Yeah, it's so stereotypical of all these sham crowd funders that when they are finally called to the carpet to explain their complete inability to communicate about months and months of missed deadlines, their response is always, "There's just this one minor problem we are fine tuning to make things perfect." Then they roll out their new and improved timeline that looks like this......

 

Jan 17, 2018 Launch money grab & announce November release

 

Feb 27, 2018 Funding success

 

April 15, 2018 Silence

 

July 24, 2018 Silence

 

October 15, 2018 More silence

 

November 18, 2018 We're totally on track, just a single minor issue to address then everything is full speed ahead.

 

February 4, 2019 Great news we've updated our timeline.

 

 

Feb 12, 2019 Prototype complete

Feb 15, 2019 Design validation

Feb 17, 2019 Electrical Validation

Feb 19, 2019 Sign contracts

Feb 22, 2019 Order raw materials

Feb 24, 2019 Ramp up production

Feb 25, 2019 Testing

Feb 26, 2019 Mass production

March 1, 2019 Shipping

As simple as that!

Indeed. Just like saying that "one key element" is not in place. Then identifying that key element as being something incredibly trivial: the controller. Then eight months later announcing how you've made GREAT STRIDES in getting to a command prompt.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote, Choice bits bolded:

 

If a creator is unable to complete their project and fulfill rewards, they’ve failed to live up to the basic obligations of this agreement. To right this, they must make every reasonable effort to find another way of bringing the project to the best possible conclusion for backers. A creator in this position has only remedied the situation and met their obligations to backers if:

  • they post an update that explains what work has been done, how funds were used, and what prevents them from finishing the project as planned;
  • they work diligently and in good faith to bring the project to the best possible conclusion in a timeframe that’s communicated to backers;
  • they’re able to demonstrate that they’ve used funds appropriately and made every reasonable effort to complete the project as promised;
  • they’ve been honest, and have made no material misrepresentations in their communication to backers; and
  • they offer to return any remaining funds to backers who have not received their reward (in proportion to the amounts pledged), or else explain how those funds will be used to complete the project in some alternate form.

The creator is solely responsible for fulfilling the promises made in their project. If they’re unable to satisfy the terms of this agreement, they may be subject to legal action by backers.

 

There is nothing you can do if a crowdfunder takes the money and runs. All they owe you is an explanation of what went wrong, and in court you could sue them to get the explanation, if they refuse to provide one.

 

You can not get a refund, even if they all got drunk and spent the money on hookers. You would in theory be able to force them to admit they got drunk and spent the money on hookers.

 

Edited by Hannacek
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would in theory be able to get them to admit they got drunk and spent the money on hookers.

 

 

“Ultimately the time, cost, and complexity have turned out to be far more challenging than we expected, and as a startup we simply do not have the finances or resources to continue to forge ahead. We have looked at it from many angles, met with new potential partners, and tried to find additional funding to keep going, however we have not been able to make progress.”

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This completely boggles my mind, the campaign is currently back up to $3,003,479! Which means people are still signing up! :? Okay, some probably just heard of it, but don't people search for what's being said before throwing their money at something?

 

Or is it someone (who could that be? :ponder: ) making sure the campaign doesn't fall behind $3 mil? :mad:

Edited by lingyi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

“Ultimately the time, cost, and complexity have turned out to be far more challenging than we expected, and as a startup we simply do not have the finances or resources to continue to forge ahead. We have looked at it from many angles, met with new potential partners, and tried to find additional funding to keep going, however we have not been able to make progress.”

 

Noooo... no one would say that. Ohh... :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This completely boggles my mind, the campaign is currently back up to $3,003,479! Which means people are still signing up! :? Okay, some probably just heard of it, but don't people search for what's being said before throwing their money at something?

 

Or is it someone (who could that be? :ponder: ) making sure the campaign doesn't fall behind $3 mil? :mad:

To be fair, there isn't much being said now that wasn't also being said before and during the campaign.

 

There will always be people with more money than sense.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If their aim has been to make it look like their company was a desirable acquisition, or raise their stock price, there's nothing that would prevent them from "investing" company dollars into their own crowdfunder. They'd just need to decide to pay the indiegogo fee, but they would probably write off the entire amount as a business expense including fees, then refund themselves off the books through an intermediary when they closed out the project after failing, or actually delivering something (unlikely). Sounds like a great tax dodge that they would probably get away with. They could just claim that a couple million of their own dollars got burnt up in all the high level development activities, but out of good faith, they decided to refund a few big backers, or most of them, once it failed.

 

In fact, that seriously makes me wonder how much of their backer fund is legitimate at all. It's very, very unusual that it would hover just over $3M like that, and as disappointing as the lack of critical thinking skills are these days, I have a hard time believing they found around 10,000 suckers that thought it was a good idea. I'd believe several hundred to a few thousand. The backer comments don't even look like a legitimate campaign of that size. We may eventually find that they never had anything to loose by failing because it was all just a paper exercise that a handful of kool-aid drinking schlubs got caught up in.

 

Thinking more on it, I don't see any mechanisms in place that would prevent, or even reveal a pretty simple ponzi scheme via these crowd funding sites. Rather than collect funds from hapless backers, do little or nothing and then claim project failure while keeping the money, they could easily do the following:

 

1. Collect backer funds on the order of say $500,000

2. Inject company money into the campaign through a number of fake backer accounts or employees of the business, say $2M.

3. Company writes off $2M as capital or operating expenses for the campaign.

4. As the campaign runs, they communicate just enough to suggest any level of activity is actually happening that costs money.

5. After the campaign runs it's course and fails, they issue partial refunds to avoid a riot thereby siphoning money from legitimate backers while making themselves whole or better.

6. They collect their $2M back or more while legitimate backers pay their indiegogo expenses via the portion of their contribution that wasn't refunded.

7. They write off anything and everything as a loss without reporting income on the proceeds they got from their refund to themselves.

 

I don't think that's tin foil hat stuff there at all. At best it's simply creative accounting.

Edited by JBerel
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Startups buy their own products all the time as a way to boost their sales numbers, and give a false sense of confidence in their business. But for Atari to do that while having to pay Indigogo and credit card fees would be insane. The only way they would do it, is if they are putting very small amounts of money into it to claim the moral victory of staying above $3 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just so you know, Rainbow Brite *was* finished by me a year ago, but they wanted to add save states and introductory text at the last minute.

I completely misunderstood them and for both items thought they wanted something *much* more extravagant than they actually wanted (I thought they wanted pages of text everywhere, and a battery save state - which I have no idea how to do). So I told them 'no'. After I gave them the source code, I found out that they only wanted a few text boxes, and a 'continue' option. They had someone else add those.

 

They were just finished a few weeks ago, and I play tested it.

 

In the case of Coleco, they are telling the truth.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't be insane if they always intended to refund themselves which can be done selectively at their own discretion.

 

You are probably overthinking it. This seems to just be a good old fashioned take the money and run scam. Maybe they were expecting to only raise $300,000 and they could reasonably claim they ran out of money. But they raised way more than expected, and had no plans to make a console.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking more on it, I don't see any mechanisms in place that would prevent, or even reveal a pretty simple ponzi scheme via these crowd funding sites.

 

I agree that you're probably overthinking it. Indiegogo skims a percentage of their take, so it's not like Atari is doing this for free. 5% of $3M is $150,000!

 

 

  • Indiegogo's platform fee on all funds raised is 5%. It is free to sign up and create a campaign and fees are deducted from the funds you actually raise (not the goal you set).
  • In addition, Stripe (credit card processor) charges a processing fee of 3% + 0.30 per transaction. There may also be an additional wire transfer fee, depending on your currency and bank account location.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Upon reflection, it may seem like more than that group can fathom, but the 5% and/or other fees isnt at issue. They get that back and more by only issuing partial refunds and keeping anything else. They refund themselves whatever they want, but the portion they held back from others would far exceed the 5% fee they paid. Remember in addition to that, they would also be writing off their expenses in doing it which would yield another 30% in tax exemptions. Its not a stretch to make money on the boondoggle both coming and going. Keeping in mind that their ultimate goal would be to demonstrate interest and buzz for potential shareholders.

 

That said, with this group, they probably only raised 30k and they misplaced the decimal. Point is, theres no rule book or regulatory components in any of it.

Edited by JBerel
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...