Jump to content
Goochman

New Atari Console that Ataribox?

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Tickled_Pink said:

And let's be honest again - how many of us would be in the "rabid backers" category if the Tramiel-era Atari were still going and were seeking resurrection through a project like this?

 

Oh boy, just what we all need....

 

ATARI JAGUAR Mini Classic Edition!!!

 

  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the article says '30 Jaguar games'- i guess the old joke is: "there's 30 games worth playing on the Jaguar?"

 

I kid, i kid, don't roast me- there are *some* good games for the Jaguar that I've played. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, digdugnate said:

the article says '30 Jaguar games'- i guess the old joke is: "there's 30 games worth playing on the Jaguar?"

Fixed that for you. ;) 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Jesse Scroggins" takes up the sword to defend the honor of "Atari" with some truly dazzling leaps in logic. Anyone who is blocked must have deserved it, but if "Atari" doesn't show any game footage, it must be do to their compliance with the law. 

Quote

If Atari blocked you Im sure they had a reason. The gameplay footage from E3 has not been released probably because they dont have the rights to the game they used to show the potential of the Atari. They are probably prevented by copyright law to show the game they played at E3. If so, we have to wait on Atari to showcase a game of their own.

 

1911165845_ScreenShot2019-08-15at1_18_18PM.thumb.png.cc39de3e2007e2229ed46d974d04bd3d.png

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Douche bags like that are why crowd funded euthanasia should be a thing. 

 

Hey ya pud-knockin' tool bag, one word for ya....  

carbon-fiber-kevlar-cloth-500x500.jpg

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point, I'm saddened that Nolan Bushnell didn't re-acquire the name and properties (I know, he probably couldn't have afforded it, but still...)

At BEST he could have made something out of the company. At worst, he's the proper person to kill off the company.

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Flojomojo said:

"Jesse Scroggins" takes up the sword to defend the honor of "Atari" with some truly dazzling leaps in logic. Anyone who is blocked must have deserved it, but if "Atari" doesn't show any game footage, it must be do to their compliance with the law. 

 

1911165845_ScreenShot2019-08-15at1_18_18PM.thumb.png.cc39de3e2007e2229ed46d974d04bd3d.png

"...probably because they don't have the rights to the game they used to show the potential of the Atari."

 

So does that mean that Atari condones the use of illegal, unlicensed software on their platform? I'm sure that's a selling point that will get developers on-board post haste!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Shaggy the Atarian said:

"...probably because they don't have the rights to the game they used to show the potential of the Atari."

 

So does that mean that Atari condones the use of illegal, unlicensed software on their platform? I'm sure that's a selling point that will get developers on-board post haste!

 

From Rob Wyatt's job application manifesto:

Quote

On the technical side the biggest take away from working on other platforms is to openly embrace developers and not enforce sometimes overly-strict usage models by strict APIs. In the spirit of being open, Atari wants the VCS platform to give developers all the freedom they need to be creative. Your solution to a problem doesn’t have to make sense to me, it just has to make sense to you. We’ll support you as much as we can to make sure your solution works. One thing you’ll never hear from us is “Why do you want to do that?”

1747334335_RobWyattNewShirt.thumb.jpg.6ab10c9f83498f0a5f5b482522804fd7.jpg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi good evening:

 

I know this is a tired question: why Atari doesn't hire a game developer studio to develop new games for the AtacoBox? I mean they have the money of the crowdfunding campaign or not? 🌮  🌮🌮

  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, delmero said:

I know this is a tired question: why Atari doesn't hire a game developer studio to develop new games for the AtacoBox? I mean they have the money of the crowdfunding campaign or not? 🌮  🌮🌮

Snarky answer: Because they don't want to dictate content. (Fred was quoted saying something to that effect, although it's buried here forever lost amongst the tacos now...)

 

Snarkier answer: Because they blew it all on hookers and coke.

 

Probable answer: They lack any sort of creative vision and leadership, and are incapable of giving the necessary guidance to a studio to make a viable, quality game.

 

Actual answer: That sounds suspiciously like work. Work is icky.

 

 

  • Like 8
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The gameplay footage from E3 has not been released probably because they dont have the rights to the game they used to show the potential of the Atari. They are probably prevented by copyright law to show the game they played at E3

 

They played Tempest 4000 at E3?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, delmero said:

Hi good evening:

 

I know this is a tired question: why Atari doesn't hire a game developer studio to develop new games for the AtacoBox? I mean they have the money of the crowdfunding campaign or not? 🌮  🌮🌮

If they had an in-house developer that cranked out good (or at least popular and profitable, which is not always the same thing) games, they wouldn't NEED to bother with distractions like "new consoles." 

 

The closest thing they have to a hit is RollerCoaster Tycoon, which they license from someone else, and they have been milking it to death. 

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KaeruYojimbo said:

 

They played Tempest 4000 at E3?

It hasn't been ported to Linux. If you want to play it install windows and do their sandbox mode. I'm pretty sure they used to say comes with 101 games (vault =100, T4K was the one). Now they only say 100.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, frankodragon said:

Don't forget that "Atari" also likes to use their money for paying lawyers.

 

simpsons_lawyers.jpg.ea421d63a24b0c327e902bf05c6690ff.jpg

That money spent on lawyers could be used to make excellent games for the AtacoBox or to make a working machine ready to ship, I mean it's tiring to be pulling the whistle cord continuously. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet we'd all be shocked at how much the Atari boneheads ended up paying out to Fergie. $50 would be too much, but I bet you they paid out a sizable percentage of the entire crowdfund take just based on shear incompetence. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know how we'd ever know, but I wouldn't be surprised if the lawyers on both sides got more money than Feargal did. 

 

Presumably there's more money to be made (and certainly less risk) by licensing out the old stuff than trying to make something new. Or else they'd be doing something different, right?

 

One thing's for certain, the lawyers are busy. Here's everything on pacermonitor for "Atari Interactive" since 1/1/2018. T-shirt peddlers, beware!

 

giphy.gif

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Redbubble, Inc. (5:18-cv-03451)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jun 11, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. TP Apparel, LLC et al (3:18-cv-04115)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jul 10, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Zazzle, Inc. (3:18-cv-03843)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jun 27, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Zazzle, Inc. (4:18-cv-03843)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jun 27, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Redbubble, Inc. (3:18-cv-03451)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jun 11, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. SunFrog, LLC (3:18-cv-04949)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Aug 15, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. SunFrog, LLC (4:18-cv-04949)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Aug 15, 2018

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Teespring, Inc. (3:19-cv-00111)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jan 08, 2019

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Teespring, Inc. (5:19-cv-00111)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jan 08, 2019

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:44 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive Inc v. Target Corporation (2:18-cv-10735)

Courts > California Central District Court

Filed: Dec 28, 2018

Judge: Dale S Fischer

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive Inc

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Target Corporation (1:19-cv-03111)

Courts > New York Southern District Court

Filed: Apr 08, 2019

Judge: Lewis A Kaplan

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc. (2:19-cv-00608)

Courts > California Central District Court

Filed: Jan 25, 2019

Judge: Christina A Snyder

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

 

Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Ooshirts, Inc. (3:19-cv-00264)

Courts > California Northern District Court

Filed: Jan 15, 2019

Judge: Jon S Tigar

Nature of Suit: Property Rights - Trademark

Cause: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Parties Matched: Atari Interactive, Inc.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, delmero said:

That money spent on lawyers could be used to make excellent games for the AtacoBox or to make a working machine ready to ship, I mean it's tiring to be pulling the whistle cord continuously. 

 

If I'm reading things right, the lawyers at least pay for themselves if not bring in money:

 

Quote

 

Other highlights:

  • April 2018: Capital increase of €7.5 million
  • September 2018: Settlement of the Raynal litigation for the "Alone in the Dark" franchise.
  • September 2018: Sale of "Alone in the Dark" and "Act of War" for €735k.
  • December 2018: Receipt of US$1.1 million in the context of a settlement for infringement upon the Atari brand. The Group is moreover pursuing other corporations to assert its intellectual property rights.

 

 

Well, if Feargal Mac or Reynal or others wouldn't have sued:

 

Quote

Other Income and Expenses

Other income and expenses amounted to -€0.6 million and corresponded to expenses, net of compensation and legal fees, for various litigations against Atari which have now been resolved.

 

As always, let me know if I missed or misread anything.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love to know the breakdown of that -600K, specifically how much went to Feargal. I would think that he would be gagged from disclosing that as part of the settlement. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect they answered that themselves....

 

Can’t I just buy a Raspberry Pi, an enclosure, gamepad, keyboard, and mouse, 3D print a faceplate, install Armbian, buy 30+ games, build the source for ARM or install/configure in DOSBox for each and every game, create a menu system with game art, and tell everyone about it at parties?

No........or yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...