Jason_Atari Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 I was playing a round of spider fighter the other day and something dawned on me. I don't think there are any Activision games that have sprite flicker. Would that be intentional either due to sprite placement or good programming? Your thoughts? 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cambouis de l'Atari Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Now that you tell it, yes indeed ! Probably their quest for perfection, as they also hide the hmove bars : ) 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flojomojo Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 I don't think there are any Activision games that have sprite flicker. Would that be intentional either due to sprite placement or good programming? Your thoughts? That, and they designed around the limitations of the hardware. Until the very late stage of the company, they never did any arcade ports, so they could do what worked instead of trying to copy much more powerful hardware. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctorclu Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 I think it was magic or some future technology. At least that was the way it seemed growing up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Jentzsch Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Activision had a strict "no flicker" policy. So they had to designs their games accordingly. Either by editing/limiting the graphic layout or by using advanced programming techniques. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzip Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 They were definitely graphical wizards. I remember being amazed at the first Activision title I saw, Tennis. Up until then, most 2600 games had very blocky looking graphics (Air-Sea battle, Adventure, Dodge-Em to name a few). I think they forced other companies to up their game. Even Atari's game featured much more detailed graphics after Activision hit the scene. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 I seem to remember they had a policy of minimal flicker, and while not necessarily original ideas, most games were made to fit into Atari limitations, so it worked well. The quality of game design, in addition to most games being actually run was why Activision was one of the top games for the 2600 for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+RichG1972 Posted April 19, 2019 Share Posted April 19, 2019 The way I see it, Activision designed their games according to their OWN rules, not according to a corporate mentality. When the people that started Activision worked for Atari, they could only design the games the way the "powers that be" at Atari wanted it done, but when they LEFT Atari and formed Activision, they were able to do things the way THEY wanted to do it and in turn took a better approach and we ended up with BETTER games, and if anyone that worked for Activision during that time is a member here they can say whether my hunch is right or not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
retroeight Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 I believe ghost busters or rampage has flicker. They also don't have those lines on the left. lloyd 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevKelley Posted April 24, 2019 Share Posted April 24, 2019 I believe ghost busters or rampage has flicker. They also don't have those lines on the left. lloyd I have been meaning to look it up but I might as well ask. I have seen those black lines on the sides of the screen on some games and I had wondered what purpose they served. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cynicaster Posted April 26, 2019 Share Posted April 26, 2019 That, and they designed around the limitations of the hardware. Until the very late stage of the company, they never did any arcade ports, so they could do what worked instead of trying to copy much more powerful hardware. ^^ this is huge, IMO. They certainly weren't afraid to draw shameless inspiration from game concepts that had proven viable in the arcades, but they absolved themselves from having to re-create infeasible one-for-one replicas of arcade hits by simply pilfering the ideas that they could run with and marketing them as original games with different names. It's impossible to look at Kaboom and not see Avalanche, Megamania and not see Astro Blaster, Enduro and not see Turbo, etc. But those games are excellent nonetheless, and, IMO, are in a very elite tier of quality in the 2600 library. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbeliever Posted April 29, 2019 Share Posted April 29, 2019 I love Activision titles for my Atari 2600, in particular Pitfall and Laser Blast (two of my favorites). Nary a flicker from what I can see. I could play both of these for hours and was always impressed by the way they programmed for the Atari 2600. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agamon Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 There are a lot of 2600 games that, if you're unfamiliar with them, you'll have no idea what is supposed to be represented on the screen. Almost none of those are Activision games. Bright, clean, sharp, and you can tell at a glance what you're looking at. With games, being fun is most important, and most Activision games are, but nice looking is a close second for me, and they do that in spades, as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flojomojo Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 did someone say There are a lot of 2600 games that, if you're unfamiliar with them, you'll have no idea what is supposed to be represented on the screen. Almost none of those are Activision games. Bright, clean, sharp, and you can tell at a glance what you're looking at. With games, being fun is most important, and most Activision games are, but nice looking is a close second for me, and they do that in spades, as well. different games (Blackjack vs Bridge) but Atari didn't even show the suits of the cards it displayed! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.