Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SpiceWare

Deceitful Media

Recommended Posts

The Wall Street Journal tweeted this today:

 

 

I just skimmed the video and a couple things immediately stood out.

1) They stopped their stock chart in May:

 

2063162107_ScreenShot2019-06-26at2_37_15PM.thumb.png.96ae93698ac0bbd739f158089a1e1542.png

 

Which hides the recent gains:

 

1102209538_ScreenShot2019-06-26at2_42_19PM.thumb.png.6583941e2573b8daba80242ed6a94034.png

 

 

2) When they talk about the Gigafactory in China they show photos like these:

 

664129125_ScreenShot2019-06-26at2_37_45PM.thumb.png.99c026b04e56fcd3bb0430cedd965b98.png

 

218117309_ScreenShot2019-06-26at2_37_57PM.thumb.png.cbd9263d9a979f3af5088934b922b98b.png

 

When it currently looks like this:

 

1993234517_ScreenShot2019-06-26at2_48_40PM.thumb.png.c0f095386b8a45e0305a880032c202dd.png

 

267765934_ScreenShot2019-06-26at2_48_47PM.thumb.png.aed0f90470610bbeb83107d4336fc008.png

 

Makes one question the validity of everything else the Wall Street Journal puts out.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After the market closed on Tuesday, July the 2nd, Tesla announced they delivered 95,200 cars, the most ever in their history:

852404_ScreenShot2019-07-06at11_16_56AM.png.957e4e153b622b74468c5d8086e2cc97.png

 

 

Yet Henry Fernandez at Fox Business reports:

 

224921368_ScreenShot2019-07-06at9_59_40AM.thumb.png.15efd01863721e8e04d110a8f193f9d2.png

 

3,200 less than reality.  Additionally he reports the stock dropped:

 

1606398636_ScreenShot2019-07-06at10_00_25AM.thumb.png.f894b1900ebdf1c3c666f9e0e1b40472.png

 

 

Doesn't say "today" or "Friday", which would be accurate as the stock closed down $1.80, so it implies the stock is down since Tesla's delivery announcement.  Looking at TSLA Historical Stock Prices I see:

 

2045661354_ScreenShot2019-07-06at10_02_26AM.thumb.png.f0f26918c8fae51100f9c062d31a6073.png

 

So before the Q2 announcement, the market closed at 224.55.  Most recently it closed at 233.10.  Sure looks like a gain to me.🤔

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 6/26/2019 at 2:51 PM, SpiceWare said:

The Wall Street Journal tweeted this today:

 

Another tweet on June 26th, this one by Business Insider.

 

 

 

Their video shows a mudpit for the Gigafactory 3. 

 

2089047256_ScreenShot2019-07-06at11_28_26AM.thumb.png.d589c793adf53f94fe5be09e82b31a43.png

 

538425039_ScreenShot2019-07-06at11_24_16AM.thumb.png.a417da98f9efec5e3b39ec180898fd00.png

 

Are they in cahoots with the Wall Street Journal?

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fun to write about big egos (like Musk) having a hard time. If they only said the positive stuff, they'd be accused of working for Tesla. 

 

I don't know how WSJ became the mouthpiece "sources familiar with the matter" for accurate leaks about Apple (another media punching bag) but maybe Tesla needs to work the back channel in a similar way. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no problem with that, Elon's done some boneheaded things and should be called out for them. I have a big problem with the media making up and/or presenting things in a deceiving manner like I've been seeing.

 

When it occurs as often as it does with things I'm familiar with, I can only belive it's the same for things I'm not as familiar with.  Therefore I now consider everything that the Wall Street Journal, Fox Business, Business Insider, New York Times (foreshadowing), etc. publish as something not to be trusted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On June 22 the New York Times published a FUD piece on EVs - L.A. to Vegas and Back by Electric Car: 8 Hours Driving; 5 More Plugged In. They used a Chevy Bolt and drove 540 miles to Vegas and back, without staying overnight in Vegas to charge.

 

Alex and Eric decided to take their cars, a Model 3 and a Bolt, on a trip to Vegas to show the experience of actual EV owners. Though it would be unusual to do so, they opted not to charge overnight in Vegas so as to match the NY Times:

 

 

Executive Summary:

  • New York Times, 8 hours drive time, 5 hours charge time
  • Eric's Bolt , 10:10 drive, 0:59 charge
  • Alex' Model 3, 10:04 drive, 2:45 charge

Differences in drive time due to a longer distance (607+ miles) due to them starting/ending in Thousand Oaks (west of NYT's starting point in LA) and having to take a detour on the way back due to a major accident.
 

Alex estimates it'd have taken 15 minutes to charge his Model 3 each way if he'd Destination Charged in Vegas, like one normally would.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to recall similar stories from a few years back. There's definitely a bias towards the "interesting anecdote" or punchy headline. The worst is when a reporter has an agenda and selectively chooses facts to fit their preconceived story. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...