Jump to content
IGNORED

PoP Slicer sound, should we update it ?


rensoup

PoP slicer sound poll   

71 members have voted

  1. 1. Should we update the slicer sound ?

    • keep current one
      40
    • new version 3
      16
    • new version 4
      1
    • new version 5
      12
    • new version 6
      2

  • Please sign in to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

 The others don't have the scrape chong scrape going on.... and the tink is out of place, it would have to blend in better and sound more like metal

so I changed from leaning 5 back to ORIGINAL for me...

Edited by _The Doctor__
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While 5 reminds more of a gunshot than powerful slicer and 3 I earlier preferred has a bit too high frequency of metallic sound, I changed my mind to stay with ORIGINAL. 

 

It's missing metallic effect, but at least original sounds powerful enough. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rybags said:

3 has that high pitched pure tone at the end that sounds just wrong.

Exactly, if only that metallic tone was a bit lower, it would sound much better.

 

Anyway, I still can't quite believe Atari PoP miracle we're discussing here!?

Edited by Jacques
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current one sounds best over all, not as metallic as I like, but all the rest sound worse to me, even 5 that I said before was a toss up between it and the current one. Number 3's end "tink" sounds like hitting a xylophone with the bar held to prevent reverberation...terrible.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, emkay said:

A real comparision is possible, if the same type of recording is used ... btw.

 

Interesting, it seems a bit too much of a "crash" sound at the beginning...  I think the current one in the game is heavier and more "windy" which suits the slicer better but that's an interesting take on it. 

 

Looks like it only needs 2 channels ? not sure why you're using 4 ?

 

Edited by rensoup
more details
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rensoup said:

Interesting, it seems a bit too much of a "crash" sound at the beginning...  I think the current one in the game is heavier and more "windy" which suits the slicer better but that's an interesting take on it. 

 

Looks like it only needs 2 channels ? not sure why you're using 4 ?

 

4 channels plus different frequency range, to have a "fuller" sound.

Are the FX in your videos done in RMT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, emkay said:

4 channels plus different frequency range, to have a "fuller" sound.

But it looks there's only 2 different notes: E-1 & A-1 (Not a RMT expert so I could be missing something) ?

 

Quote

Are the FX in your videos done in RMT?

yes, it's all RMT (music/sfx)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Here's the current jawclash in RMT for anyone interested. It uses 3 channels...

 

The nice thing about sound in PoP is that it was designed for the Apple2 so it's really limited: 1 tune or 1 sfx which means it's a good opportunity to show off Pokey as sfx can use all 4 channels.

 

Of course more channels means more CPU time but since I'm using dmsc's LZSS, decoding a single channel take 2-3 scanlines.

 

edit: I've been very surprised with what Pokey can output, it seems you can get digi like sounds with at just 50hz when using several channels 

 

popsfx_jawclash2.rmt

Edited by rensoup
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...