classicgamer74 Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 In my latest I discuss Double Dragon and it's various ports, including the Atari 2600 port. What was your opinion of that one and/or the others? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KevinMos3 Posted April 21, 2020 Share Posted April 21, 2020 I always liked the 2600 version, but struggled to get to the final mission (as a kid, I would usually run out of time or lives toward the end of mission 3). The graphics captured my imagination, wondering what the next screens would hold. At first, I was a little disappointed that it didn't play like the NES version, (you can't just walk up and start punching the enemies). The strategy I used was to stay in the lower left corner and kick, which took too much time and is why I would end up running out of time somewhere in mission 3. It wasn't until I started hacking the graphics several years ago that I finally learned the strategy of using the elbow smash to dominate the enemies. Now, I REALLY enjoy the game. Mastering the elbow smash opened up the game to learn other gameplay strategies to eek out more points. I like to taunt the enemies with a few kicks or punches before knocking them down with an elbow smash. On screens with a weapon, I like to do the same (kick or punch a couple times before I smack them with a bat or barrel. Knives are still more challenging to acquire). Any time I sit down thinking I'll only play for a few minutes, I end up getting hooked and play through to the end. I bought the 7800 version from Video 61 sometime around '94. I really liked the background graphics, but was turned off by the character sprites. The gameplay seemed more forgiving than the 2600 version, but I still found it too difficult to get very far. I don't remember how far I used to get back then. However, like with the 2600 version I became much better at playing the game when hacking the graphics. Also, like the 2600 version, I REALLY enjoy playing the game now, and easily get hooked any time I start to play thinking I'll just take a minute. The NES version was THE Double Dragon version among my friends, so I always wanted the Atari versions to be more like the NES one. Looking back at it now, I can appreciate how the Atari versions were more like the arcade, whereas the NES version was reworked to be more suited for a home console. I don't remember playing the SMS version as a kid, but when I finally did play it, I was turned off by the graphics. I think it's the brown character outlines that didn't appeal to me, so I did a graphics hack a few years back that changed the character outlines to black and tweaked the player sprite. Although it plays more like the NES version, I think I enjoy the Atari versions more. I always loved the Lynx version. I was really impressed with the graphics and gameplay. I love the large sprites and consider it a showcase title. I didn't notice until recent years that it seems to have the graphics of the Genesis version and it's missing some of the mission transitions to save ROM space. I haven't played the Amiga version, but I don't like the character sprites. I've not spent much time with other computer ports either, Amstrad, ZX Spectrum, Atari ST, Commodore 64 (although I do own a version of this), etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.