Jump to content
IGNORED

Which to buy: Side3 vs AVG Cart?


Larry

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Mr Robot said:

Do tell...

The loader now stores the entire FAT directory in up to 64KB of SRAM, for starters (allowing up to 1,000 files per folder without paging), as well as the pointer array for said file list. Stand-alone ATR support (which of course uses a RAM-based OS) uses much of the rest of the SRAM (I am still implementing this, but four 180K images, say, will just about fill everything). Note that once mounted, a cartridge image will (optionally) remain active and in SRAM until you un-mount it (regardless of repeatedly going in and out of the loader), hence the loader doesn't use those same areas of SRAM for its own purposes.

 

That's not to say third parties can't exploit things in any way they wish. I think video playback from a non-contiguous FAT file would be possible using DMA and perhaps utilising the entirety of SRAM as a read-ahead cache, for example.

Edited by flashjazzcat
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bfollowell said:

For me, I wanted the best compatibility with the most cartridge types and, from my research at the time that I bought my Ultimate Cart, the UC won. Also, I knew I planned to build a 1088XEL with the CF3 installed, so I really wouldn't need the HD emulation of the SIDE2, or the SIDE3.

 

Just an FYI, the UC supports the most common cart formats so it covers a great number of carts, the AVG support a bunch more, SIDE 2 only supports 8K carts, SIDE 3 looks like it will support at least the same formats as the AVG.

 

Ultimate Cart got left behind due to lack of software updates or continued development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Larry said:

Watching your videos and owning a SIDE2 + U1MB.  Not trying to offend you -- that's just how I see it.

Setting up a hard drive is unavoidably complicated (on SIDE2, AVGCART and I expect SIDE3). Running stuff from Jon's SIDE loader is as simple as it gets; fast search, MAP files for multi disk software etc. it's just awesome.

 

For 'running stuff' I'd say AVGCART is more complicated, the available options are not on screen as an aide memoire, you have to know what button does what. I've written some docs to help with that. @tmp feels it's better to have more lines of available files on screen over window chrome. I feel there may be some space between those two opinions but that's just me, I'm not developing either of them.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr Robot said:

Just an FYI, the UC supports the most common cart formats so it covers a great number of carts, the AVG support a bunch more, SIDE 2 only supports 8K carts, SIDE 3 looks like it will support at least the same formats as the AVG.

 

Ultimate Cart got left behind due to lack of software updates or continued development.

 

True, but as I said, at the time I ordered my UC, about a year-and-a-half ago, AVG development was very early and it was nowhere near the UC in terms of compatibility. It has definitely met and even surpassed it since that time though. Ah, hindsight is always 20/20.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mclaneinc said:

If true that's good to hear

It's true, @tmp had me add that to the docs last night.

You're right about the cables, and I have no intention of making any more of those ?, it's all on the user and whether tmp wants to start making them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bfollowell said:

 

True, but as I said, at the time I ordered my UC, about a year-and-a-half ago, AVG development was very early and it was nowhere near the UC in terms of compatibility. It has definitely met and even surpassed it since that time though. Ah, hindsight is always 20/20.

 

 

Yes, when I got my Ultimate Cartridge, I really thought it was the "ultimate."  Innovation marches on, doesn't it?  When I bought my first 800, I believed that was "as good as it gets" for a home computer.  Then the IBM PC juggernaut was unleashed followed by Windows and here we are at 4GHz multi-core with Windows 10.  And the beat goes on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DrVenkman said:

Which is a damned shame because it is, as you pointed out, completely open-source. :( 

 

https://github.com/robinhedwards/UltimateCart

It is! I tried to install the dev environment just to have a go at it but it's a nightmare to even get it installed and set up correctly. Such a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, bfollowell said:

 

True, but as I said, at the time I ordered my UC, about a year-and-a-half ago, AVG development was very early and it was nowhere near the UC in terms of compatibility. It has definitely met and even surpassed it since that time though. Ah, hindsight is always 20/20.

 

I have an almost unused UC in my collection for exactly those reasons too :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Mr Robot said:

It's true, @tmp had me add that to the docs last night.

You're right about the cables, and I have no intention of making any more of those ?, it's all on the user and whether tmp wants to start making them.

 

To be fair, the cables are not exactly hard to do, mounting the mini connector on the pcb is more daunting for those that have not soldered before, bridging the connector pins isn't easy but looks like it might be..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheMontezuma said:

You make too good evaluation videos ?

Thank you very much, but please bear in mind that the last video was made a month ago and the firmware is still being finished. So one is evaluating a device based on WIP previews which are rather out of date, and with the benefit of no first hand experience whatsoever.

 

Just to be clear: I have owned an AVG cart for a year or more, and I helped its designer when he was implementing IDE emulation. Only last weekend, I fitted the SIO cable to a customer device and was quite impressed with the result.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is hard to compare the two properly as its still being finished, in truth both devices are still evolving firmware wise at this point.. I don't know how far Jon is from finishing the firmware, the last video hinted at a LOT of coding to do.

 

As for if it will all ATR's jon has already answered that with

 

Quote

It should work with anything which does not attempt to directly drive serial IO by bypassing the operating system. There are some such ATRs and XEXs, of course, which have no hope of being loaded from a cartridge or PIO solution

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, xxl said:

can every ATR be loaded from SIDE3? or only some, as it was with SIDE2?

SIDE2 had no stand-alone provision for ATR loading whatsoever, so I can only assume you're talking about ATR support in concert with your nemesis the Ultimate 1MB. And I'm sure that as a seasoned developer you're well aware that any PBI hosted ATR which chooses to bypass SIOV and communicate directly with the serial bus will not work in such circumstances. Those that do (i.e. the vast majority), however, work without issue and at speeds many times higher than the fastest available SIO baud rates.

 

If you bother to read the thread, you'll see I already acknowledged that direct SIO support is the most 'compatible' solution:

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, StickJock said:

To modify the question a bit, which cartridge if you do NOT have the Ultimate 1MB upgrade?

If you want to run ATRs without U1MB and without any SIO2PC or other SIO2xxx device, AVG will probably suit you well. If the pros and cons of stand-alone ATR support are not a concern, however, you can base your decision on price, availability, design, user interface, etc. Both devices run cartridges and XEX files on stock machines without U1MB. SIDE3's battery-backed real time clock may sway you in SIDE3's direction if you are a SpartaDOS X fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...