Jump to content
IGNORED

Clam Shells


dhe

Recommended Posts

The Nylon is every bit as bitchy as I remember it being, as concerns its habit to warp and distort while printing.  Be that as it may, the ways it decided to warp were not show stoppers for the test.  The wiggle problem was properly resolved by making the bottom of the shell flat, and  YES-- Cards with the "hang-out" in the back do in fact fit inside the clamshell, and then fit inside the PEB without wiggle. (Tested with TI RS232 card.)

 

Here are the files for the community.

 

PebShell_B.stlPebShell_A.stlPEB card clamshell side B.stpPEB card clamshell side A.stp

 

You will need screws.  I modeled these with just blind holes, but the holes are both deep enough and large enough to be "screw thread tapped" with a self-threading screw.  I sourced some suitable ones from the local Walmart.  They are #6 1/2 inch sheet metal screws.  They are self tapping, with a coarse thread.  The package looks like this:

 

c9630f0c-ddfd-41de-af64-742d31b01768.17f

To use them PROPERLY, you have to do a bit of a gentle procedure before assembling the shell:

 

Turn side A over to expose the screw posts. Start the screw with a manual screwdriver, and turn *VERY VERY SLOWLY*.  If it feels very tight, back the screw out a bit, then re-tighten, then continue.  Do this until about half the thread has been pulled into the screw post.  Do this for all 4 screw posts.  Remove the screws.

 

Turn side B over to expose the screw lands.  If you turned on supports, (which you NEED to do, to support the long PEB retention tabs!) you probably have support material in the counterbored holes, and will need to remove it.  We can kill 2 birds with one stone here--  Insert the screw as you did with side A, and turn very slowly.  As the screw penetrates and goes out the other side, it will put pressure on the support material, and lift it out of the recess.  Use a small metal tool to lift it the rest of the way, and pull it out.  Tap it through the rest of the way until thread is fully through, then back out the screws again.

 

Assemble the shell, with your card, lining up the LED, the back-porch (if applicable) and the 4 screw holes.  Like the original PEB shell, it has overhanging lips that mate between sides A and B.  (Some fiddling may be required.)  Insert screws one at a time into the shell via the counterbored hole sockets on the back of side B.  Screw the screws down until the heads are flush with the back of side B. (A small amount of head might still be raised, after fully tightening; This is fine, there is enough room between PEB cards that they wont interfere.)

 

These screws have been tested with both nylon and PLA prints.  PLA is more fragile. Be very gentle when tapping the posts.

 

Edited by wierd_w
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For vintage cards (like a Geneve), I would say that you could run a strip of heat pipe in there.  There is quite a lot of 'room' inside the shell.  You could shave off (break off?) a bit of the top of each of the bottom two screw posts, so that the shell still closes with the heat dissipation solution being pressed down onto the regulators.

 

Two of these would probably work?

https://guide.alibaba.com/shop/aluminum-heatsink-45mm-x-45mm-x-14mm-for-voltage-regulator-scr-mosfet_1003661028.html

Shave the bottom two screw posts down 1mm or so, and then utilize mechanical clamping (with some good thermal paste) to keep the heatsink pressed under the regulator, utilizing the through-hole design.

 

 

I really intended these replacement shells for more modern cards with more modern electronics in them though. (TIPI, modern SAMS, et al.)

Edited by wierd_w
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, wierd_w said:

 

I really intended these replacement shells for more modern cards with more modern electronics in them. (TIPI, modern SAMS, et al.)

Oh, got it.  When I looked at the printed case it seemed to be built more for the older cards that required a case, like the 32K, etc.   I have a few cards like the TIPI PEB and HRD4000B where the front edge connector extends into the slot, so I wasn't certain how that would come into play.   Here's a picture for reference with cards from left to right: TI RS232, Geneve, Horizon 4000B, Myarc HFDC, SCSI card, TIPI-PEB, Myarc FDC, Horizon 3000. 

 

image.thumb.png.12aa5659042a054314e59c1f33f1115c.png

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see.. I was unaware that the board makers had done this.

 

A minor modification would make it possible to enclose them, but would eliminate the rear retention tab completely. (It would extend the size of the "back porch" slot so that it covers the whole card area, allowing the entirety of the board to stick out.)

 

These kinds of things are why I include the .stp files. (so that you can easily modify the geometry in the CAD software of your choice)

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2021 at 1:13 AM, wierd_w said:

Your creality 5 might be able to do it, but it would be a tight fit.

 

Long direction end-to-end measurement of the model is 206mm.  (my printer has a 200mm max area).  Your Creality 5 has a 220mm x 220mm bed, so it should be able to do it.

Barely.

 

The huge Chiron I ordered is a bit overkill, but damnit, I am TIRED of dealing with the issue of "printer too small" :)

235x235 it says on both my 3 and 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wierd_w said:

I see.. I was unaware that the board makers had done this.

 

A minor modification would make it possible to enclose them, but would eliminate the rear retention tab completely. (It would extend the size of the "back porch" slot so that it covers the whole card area, allowing the entirety of the board to stick out.)

 

These kinds of things are why I include the .stp files. (so that you can easily modify the geometry in the CAD software of your choice)

 

 

Pretty much every modern board has tabs at front and back to allow them to use the stabilization fingers in the card cages. Another major difference is the holes in the board--unless they support a heatsink, they are just not there, and even when they do, they are generally out of alignment with the case screw holes. Note that the metal cases also have some bumps and posts that go through the board in the vicinity of the 60-pin connector. The corresponding holes in the circuit cards are missing, and often, the studs/posts will impact components.

 

I have a few boards that I designed with all of the correct holes/spacing, but as I couldn't get enough board cases to make it practical, I didn't take that option too far. Having new cases available does increase the attractivity of doing boards for clamshells again though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Since I have the dehydrator (kinda) working, I can do long prints with nylon now, without the filament absorbing water like a depends undergarment.

 

As such, I have made some modifications to the previous design, specifically to stiffen the shell up a bit for use with the smurf-blue weed trimmer nylon. Once I test the changes, and am happy with them, I will upload them.

 

There is nothing wrong with the prior models; this is explicitly changes made specifically to add the extra stiffness needed for the nylon.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look how much better it looks when it stays dry while printing. :)

 

20210421_183239.thumb.jpg.163de0702f73b1f4613c12abd538039f.jpg

20210421_183018.thumb.jpg.41ba3269d41a38e0f345decdfa4041f2.jpg

 

part B could stand to have the stiffener waffle core a little taller.  I was worried it would interfere with the backs of the cards, but test assembly shows there is room. I am gonna use it.

 

initial results show a significant improvement in shell stiffness while retaining sufficient flexibility to stay tough and strong. 

 

i will incorporate the desired changes in part B, print again, test again, then probably release.

 

Nylon is about the ideal material for these, as it is heat resistant, impact resistant, tough, and reasonably flexible.

 

 

if i do a run of these, how many should I make?

 

The smurf-blue is very inexpensive: I get ~2 normal rolls worth of nylon, for ~30$.  Nylon normally runs between 40$ and 70$ per standard roll. Comparatively, this is about 15$ per standard roll, price wise. So, between half and a quarter the price. Only downside: only comes in smurf blue. Other colors are possible but would be special order. I estimate i could make about 10 per standard roll, so ~1.50$ worth of nylon per shell. The screws are like 5$ for 30 screws, so just a few cents more for 4 screws. Biggest cost centers are power use and shipping costs.

 

the corners lift a bit while printing but it does not impact function. Still retains the card well, and fits snug in the PEB slot.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad that wont be an issue.

 

Still, how many should I make? I already sent DHE some shells like he wanted. 

 

Are there any other takers, or should I just sideline this project until somebody needs them?  It takes a pretty long time to print these, as the chiron is a bit slow. About a whole solid 25hrs of just the print time, so having a few on hand would allow more speedy shipment...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...