Jump to content
IGNORED

OPA Gary!


dhe

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, JB said:

https://www.arcade-museum.com/game_detail.php?game_id=9650

 

I guess in fairness, this is more of a clone. Was pretty sure they had a straight-up pirate cab too, but can't find it at present.

A clone is completely different, and it does not seem Taito ever sued Nintendo.  It may be a "blatant rip-off."  If one were to consider a rip-off or clone as piracy, one could also accuse Texas Instruments of pirating Space Invaders.  Even if Nintendo had violated Taito's copyright, similar to the Ms. Pac-Man saga, the fact pattern would bear no resemblance to the GaryOPA situation.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, OLD CS1 said:

A clone is completely different, and it does not seem Taito ever sued Nintendo.  It may be a "blatant rip-off."  If one were to consider a rip-off or clone as piracy, one could also accuse Texas Instruments of pirating Space Invaders.  Even if Nintendo had violated Taito's copyright, similar to the Ms. Pac-Man saga, the fact pattern would bear no resemblance to the GaryOPA situation.

Yeah. I thought they were one of the many companies with an overt pirate copy of Space Invaders. I appear to have been mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JB said:

Yeah. I thought they were one of the many companies with an overt pirate copy of Space Invaders. I appear to have been mistaken.

Semantics.  Piracy implies theft of a copy of the original game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

13 hours ago, OLD CS1 said:

A clone is completely different, and it does not seem Taito ever sued Nintendo.  It may be a "blatant rip-off."  If one were to consider a rip-off or clone as piracy, one could also accuse Texas Instruments of pirating Space Invaders.  Even if Nintendo had violated Taito's copyright, similar to the Ms. Pac-Man saga, the fact pattern would bear no resemblance to the GaryOPA situation.

The TI and Nintendo clones pre-dated by several years the Atari vs. Philips case over K.C. Munchkin!'s similarities to Pac-Man, which set the precedent that a clone can copy the expressive concepts in an original work, which violates copyright. It may be that Japanese copyright law didn't give Taito the standing to attempt a suit against Nintendo.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, InfiniteTape said:

The TI and Nintendo clones pre-dated by several years the Atari vs. Philips case over K.C. Munchkin!'s similarities to Pac-Man, which set the precedent that a clone can copy the expressive concepts in an original work, which violates copyright. It may be that Japanese copyright law didn't give Taito the standing to attempt a suit against Nintendo.

Thank you.  I was looking for that information, as well.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Yeah, but that's the whole point of DMCA, with its anti-circumvention provisions, and similar laws. Scare people into compliance, regardless of whether circumvention might have fair uses under copyright or not. There is the whole Right-to-Repair movement as one result. Is Gary's case an example of justice, or simply monopoly enforcement, going well beyond the original intent of copyright? He made an observation about what was an obvious use of the gadget; that was taken as evidence of criminal intent. Was that a fair assessment? Consider your answer carefully and apply it to your own field of endeavor, which will likely have its own grey areas.

 

Recently I was asked to update a well-known automotive diagnostic tool with pirated $crazy_expensive firmware and/or database (which is the real monopolistic money item here). Probably would have been a sideload of some kind, but I declined, since the tool would obviously phone home for OTA updates, is serialized, and I'm sure the vendor tracks these things. Not to mention it felt like a setup anyway. Some people need to have an angle on you, even if they have to manufacture it, it seems. Obviously Gary should have known better, but he got a raw deal, and the big fish apparently got away. Glad to hear he's served his time, and wish him well.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I know that in Germany we have a term "personal bankrupcy" that can be declared when your debts are so high that you cannot pay them back in a reasonable time. In that case, you have to reveal all your income, your assets (formerly called the "Offenbarungseid" - the "oath of revelation") and then you have to pay as much as you can, with a few things being exempt (like your home for a certain size - may require you to move to a smaller one), your contact means (telephone), TV, and I think Internet connection and a PC. Then there is a "period of well-behavedness" when you are subject to special obligations for your actions (especially spending money), after which you are released from the rest of your debt for good. Of course this means that the creditor will never get the full amount that you owe him.

 

Isn't there a kind of "personal bankrupcy" in the US or Canada? For companies there is, if I remember correctly, a "Chapter 11" regulation. I know it because my dad worked for Pan Am at Frankfurt Airport (Ground services) until they were bought by Delta Airlines - after getting under Chapter 11.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chapter 7 has no plan of repayment as chapter 11 requires.

In other words if you want to keep it you got to pay for it.

The umpteenth amendment, you have the right to be debt freeeeeeeee!

Like stay free and freedom in a box 

For lawyers.

 

Want out of debt? "One call - that's all"!!

this is not an ad for debt consolidation of bankruptcy... I'm the last person you want to talk to.

https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-basics/chapter-7-bankruptcy-basics

Edited by GDMike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, InsaneMultitasker said:

This article popped up on my start page tonight. The youtube video quality (audio) is pretty bad but mostly understandable.  

 

Nintendo Will Punish Hacker Gary Bowser For Rest Of His Life (kotaku.com)

 

 

The punishment should fit the crime, and what Nintendo is asking for is way over the top, particularly since Gary was likely small fry in that operation.

I'm pretty sure he'll find a way around it 😀

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mizapf said:

Isn't there a kind of "personal bankrupcy" in the US or Canada?

Yes, but certain kinds of debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.  Student loans, for instance.  The process is handled in a special court proceeding in which creditors may attend to protest the discharge of their debts.  In this case, the court may have already provided, as part of the judgment, the restitution must be affirmed.  If not, should Gary file for bankruptcy, Nintendo can send attorneys to the hearing and the bankruptcy trustee will determine if it can be discharged.

 

Referring back to my earlier post, Nintendo has nothing to lose here.  It is likely Gary does not have $10 million in earning ability remaining in his life, short of any inheritances or windfalls such as a lottery or casino win, or a legal judgment in his favor.  Insurance pay-outs are generally off-limits.  In any case, whether he just lives out the rest of his life and never pays off the $10m, or he discharges the debt in bankruptcy, Nintendo will write it off as a loss and claim tax benefits on the balance.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, atrax27407 said:

I wonder if he will face charges for his CD/DVD pirating scheme

We had this startup company in Gainesville that really took off called GroveShark.

 

Oddly, they found out, companies didn't like other companies selling songs, that didn't belong to them.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 3/31/2023 at 9:40 AM, OLD CS1 said:

I just wonder if he will see this thread once he is out :waving:

Thanks, I do see it now. -- As shown in this thread I got released from federal prison, and then moved to ICE as alien, where finally on May 25, they flew me back to Toronto, were now I am trying to restart my life, broke and homeless but free!

On 4/18/2023 at 9:03 AM, atrax27407 said:

I wonder if he will face charges for his CD/DVD pirating scheme which is the reason he fled Canada in the first place?

You sure been hyping alot of wrong info in this thread. I know I made mistakes in the past, and I have haters, but at least get your facts right. I never fled Canada because I was going to face charges.

 

I left Canada because I got tried of cold weather and the high cost of living (which is even worse now that I am back here, just a small apt. is over $1500 a month) and originally I went to Dominican Republic to help out a long-time friend with his real estate down there, and I fell in love with the place, I was not running away from the law, and I don't have any outstanding issues back here in Canada.

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...