moycon #26 Posted May 17, 2006 I wonder if Nintendo has been hitting the emulation sites hard and heavy. Seems to me many classic game collector probably already have the 1000's of ROMs for the NES, SNES and N64 emulators that they got for nothing years ago. But when launching a new system that heavy relies on these same ROMs...might be hard to convince people to pay any amount for them when they could get em for free (albeit illegally) plus many many more ROMs than Nintendo will ever be able to offer. I have noticed the pirate NES systems people would sell at the mall kiosks have all but disappeared. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NovaXpress #27 Posted May 17, 2006 They might be thinking that way, but it would be a waste of time. Anyone who might be into emulation and has the equipment to do so is already doing it. I know many gamers who own a PC, yet few even want to try emulators. They like the games, but they won't go to any trouble in order to play them. By offering them for sub/download on modern game systems, that takes all the work out of it. Most of those who'll be playing Sonic and Scramble would never think of trying an emulator. Remember, we are not normal people around here. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SHAGOHOD X99 #28 Posted May 20, 2006 DAMN, Hudson Soft didn't say WHICH 100 games are going to the Wii though. Also I'm wondering if Nintendo is going to bother with properly translating a lot of the better games that came out on the PC-Engine Duo? Are we going to be able to play say... Galaxy Police Woman SAPPHIRE Dracula X: Rondo of Blood Macross 2036 and stuff like that, that had lots of either text or original recorded voices? Should at least be subtitled in English at best for the cinema-cut scenes. Being a 28 yr old father now, I had to sell off the bulk of my game collections (the PC-Engine being among it), and it be great to be able to play all the latest Nintendo has to offer, all the GC lineup AND all this old school stuff. Thus I hope when Nintendo says that the Wii will have TG-16 that also extends to the PC-Engine, otherwise none of this is anything to get pumped up about. I want to finally play the RPGs like Record of Lodoss War that never made the jump stateside, even though TTi at the time was supposedly going to bring that game, along with Macross (called Robotech 2036) and a whole slew of others about the time Turbo Duo came out. Shit I'd stay up all night to play Soldier Blade again, then power up some Last Alert to hear the Guy Kazama horrible dubbing and stop the Force Project! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtariJr #29 Posted May 20, 2006 maybe the wii is your answer instead of the GPX which you couldnt make work easily. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SHAGOHOD X99 #30 Posted May 20, 2006 maybe the wii is your answer instead of the GPX which you couldnt make work easily. It's looking more and more like it. I just hope Nintendo isn't going to be half assed about this whole emulation/ROM thing. I mean all of the good stuff for TG-16 (on that note) was released in Japan for the most part. Also I haven't heard anything yet about arcade games being downloadable and playable on Wii. If somehow MAME or something like it would run all the classics, I'd gladly download like a mofo. Hell I'd rather pay to have the stuff rather than being all Cloak & Dagger about the whole thing. I'm a man with a one track mind, I want to play LSA Squad again. I haven't played it since 1988 @ a flea market, spent the last five years trying to find the upright of it to no avail. Then lost out on someone's modded XBOX with MAME and 200 ROMS already on it, (one of them being LSA Squad) by like a day. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tan #31 Posted May 29, 2006 it's nice that hudson is thinking big on this but realistically 100 TG16 games? i love my turbo and the games i have for it but really it's not exactly a mainstream system, even when it was sold in stores, and the turbo library versus the pc engine one is less than 100 games is it not? take away badly aged sports games and games with multiple system versions, and what do you have left? most collectors can't even name a great top 25 or 50 tg16 games more than likely it'll be 30 tg16 games and 70 japanese pc-engine games, still a good number but not all defining like they make it sound, if the tg16 could pull off all what 90 some tg16 games that were made?, then genny snes nes should have no less than 200 a piece and maybe 100 for the n64, which would prob make a subscription much much cheaper than buying each one, and hopefully not too expensive because of the extra crap games bloating the list. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JB #32 Posted May 29, 2006 it's nice that hudson is thinking big on this but realistically 100 TG16 games? i love my turbo and the games i have for it but really it's not exactly a mainstream system, even when it was sold in stores, and the turbo library versus the pc engine one is less than 100 games is it not? take away badly aged sports games and games with multiple system versions, and what do you have left? most collectors can't even name a great top 25 or 50 tg16 games more than likely it'll be 30 tg16 games and 70 japanese pc-engine games, still a good number but not all defining like they make it sound, if the tg16 could pull off all what 90 some tg16 games that were made?, then genny snes nes should have no less than 200 a piece and maybe 100 for the n64, which would prob make a subscription much much cheaper than buying each one, and hopefully not too expensive because of the extra crap games bloating the list. They haven't said it's 100 PCEngine games, TG16 games, Studio 2 games, or anything. Just 100 games. It's a given some of their NES titles will be there. And since they're running around grabbing every game they can find, there's no telling what they'll drag out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AtariJr #33 Posted May 29, 2006 does anyone here know if nintendo and sega are doing the same thing as hudson, as far as spending lots of time and money buying games that were on their system made by now dead 3rd party companies? or are nintendo and sega going for just 1st party games and games that are on companies that support them that arent dead yet (like square or konami). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JB #34 Posted May 29, 2006 does anyone here know if nintendo and sega are doing the same thing as hudson, as far as spending lots of time and money buying games that were on their system made by now dead 3rd party companies? or are nintendo and sega going for just 1st party games and games that are on companies that support them that arent dead yet (like square or konami). I'm betting that except for Hudson, everyone's supplying just their own software. It makes more sense from a business perspective, as it's cheaper. If Konami wants Contra: Hard Corps on the Wii, they can sign a contract themselves. Even though it was a Genesis game, it's not Sega's problem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites