Jump to content
kyle

Anyone playThe History Channel Civil War on PS2?

Recommended Posts

I can't find any real reviews for the game on PS2. And all the ones i read for the game on the 360 say it sucks. So has anyone played it on the PS2? If so is it fun? I'm not a big fan of first person shooters but i do love civil war stuff so i was thinking of getting the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My bro just bought it and he's a cival war nut and reinactor. He's says it's awesome and really authentic, with long weapon reloads and ALOT of black powder smokeSometimes authentic isn't always fun, which is why many mainstream gamers say it sucks!(what!? no lasar guns????) . Cival War fans will love it though. I say the smoke from the weapons make the game awesome from videos i've seen. I've shot and old 1800's colt pitol and there is a ton of black powder smoke for each shot and the game recreates that quit well. Cival War looks a lot better than previous attemps at the genre.

Edited by ManShowBoy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found a few player reviews online for the PS2 port and they all sound good. Yet no officail reviews for the PS2. So i dunno? Maybe it's good on the PS2 and sucks on the 360? Oh well i think i'll add it to my chritsmas list to my wife LoL.

Edited by kyle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard the game is a rental game, nothing more. Its linear, short and has no online play. I still plan on trying it out. I'll probably try and snag a used copy for $9.99.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this at EBGames and this popped right in my head. "That would be the funniest game on XBOX LIVE." I didn't take the time to check if there was multiplayer though which I doubt it has.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with multiplayer is that with the new Live Camera, people would call you weird if you played it dressed in street clothes. I know that Confederate Uniform must be around here somewhere...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm hoping to get the game as a stocking stuffer.....since i am a big FPS fan and a big Civil War buff....i love all the medal of honors and this game seems to look alot like them.....as for the authenticity, the story has some true elements but as for the reload times.......should be more like 15-20 seconds, and thats if you could reload FAST back then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but as for the reload times.......should be more like 15-20 seconds, and thats if you could reload FAST back then

The skilled shooter (meaning everyone in the militia) could fire at least three shots in under a minute. So, no, 15-20 seconds isn't fast. Maybe for a hunter, yes, but not for the army.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The problem with multiplayer is that with the new Live Camera, people would call you weird if you played it dressed in street clothes.

Oh yeah this would be a gem with the Live camera. The hairy asses in the north fighting the nutsacks in the south.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

but as for the reload times.......should be more like 15-20 seconds, and thats if you could reload FAST back then

The skilled shooter (meaning everyone in the militia) could fire at least three shots in under a minute. So, no, 15-20 seconds isn't fast. Maybe for a hunter, yes, but not for the army.

 

:ponder: hunter......but it was all about the bushwhackers and snipers :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

snipers :cool:

Yeah, that had a lot of those during the civil war :roll:

 

perhaps you do not know that much about the civil war.... :ponder: there were many snipers on both sides......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

snipers :cool:

Yeah, that had a lot of those during the civil war :roll:

 

perhaps you do not know that much about the civil war.... :ponder: there were many snipers on both sides......

Do you mean snipers or bushwackers?

The weapons didn't have much of a range back then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the weapons did not have the range they do today........but they DID have the range enough to where if you were good enough, you could put yourself in a tree and pick off people. maybe the preferred term is sharpshooter for Civil War era snipers.....one good example of a sniper is the unknown Confederate sharpshooter who, on July 1st 1863, during the battle of Gettysburg, shot General John Reynolds from his horse and thus led the First Corps to back down until Hancock was put in charge.

 

sorry for the ranting......my major is in history so i tend to get into lecture mode when it comes to this stuff....especially military history

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the weapons did not have the range they do today........but they DID have the range enough to where if you were good enough, you could put yourself in a tree and pick off people. maybe the preferred term is sharpshooter for Civil War era snipers.....one good example of a sniper is the unknown Confederate sharpshooter who, on July 1st 1863, during the battle of Gettysburg, shot General John Reynolds from his horse and thus led the First Corps to back down until Hancock was put in charge.

 

sorry for the ranting......my major is in history so i tend to get into lecture mode when it comes to this stuff....especially military history

Ah, sharpshooter was probably the word I was looking for, when I said "bushwacker". Yes, and I agree that that is definitely the coolest job in the civil war by far. I thought you were talking about sniper as in, someone who had the advantage due to sheer range of weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

almost all my ancestors were killed in action during the Civil War, on my dad's mother's side...there were five brothers who fought for the Confederacy in the Missouri militia and four died during the First Battle of Booneville....if the fifth brother had died also, I wouldn't be here right now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This looks like it could have been great with better graphics. I know it's the gameplay that counts and not the graphics, but the only people this game could apply to is the history buffs, and we want it as real as it can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...