mthompson Posted March 18, 2015 Share Posted March 18, 2015 I have to say that, even with the featured titles, I enjoyed this latest episode just as much as I have all of the others. The programmer interviews were great, and the game reviews were just as interesting and entertaining as the previous ones have been. Another fine installment! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+nurmix Posted March 18, 2015 Author Share Posted March 18, 2015 I have to say that, even with the featured titles, I enjoyed this latest episode just as much as I have all of the others. The programmer interviews were great, and the game reviews were just as interesting and entertaining as the previous ones have been. Another fine installment! Thanks, Mark! We try to make them entertaining! George was in rare form this time around... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+nurmix Posted March 26, 2015 Author Share Posted March 26, 2015 ...In your interview with Kimo Yap, unless I didn't hear it, did you ask him if the whole jungle motif for the game was his idea or did it come from Mattel or Children's Television Workshop? I got an answer from Kimo Yap, but it doesn't really answer your question completely: Kimo wrote: "The jungle theme... I actually don't remember. I'd guess it was a collaborative thing; or something that was decided before I started either by dbr (Rolfe) and/or Glenn and Mattel/Electric Company. In terms of Rolfe/Glenn it may have been partly chosen due by which what kind of animals were doable/available in the limited graphics of the time. Can't remember if there was a story board presented. Sorry I couldn't be of more help on this. There might be some old paper around somewhere on the project, although I doubt the answer to that would be in it, even if I could find it; it would be more technical stuff. If I find any of that stuff, though I'll let you know. Not sure what the legal status of it would be, though." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jointfilms.com Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 I got an answer from Kimo Yap, but it doesn't really answer your question completely: Kimo wrote: "The jungle theme... I actually don't remember. I'd guess it was a collaborative thing; or something that was decided before I started either by dbr (Rolfe) and/or Glenn and Mattel/Electric Company. In terms of Rolfe/Glenn it may have been partly chosen due by which what kind of animals were doable/available in the limited graphics of the time. Can't remember if there was a story board presented. Sorry I couldn't be of more help on this. There might be some old paper around somewhere on the project, although I doubt the answer to that would be in it, even if I could find it; it would be more technical stuff. If I find any of that stuff, though I'll let you know. Not sure what the legal status of it would be, though." Thanks Paul. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeM_Intellivision Posted March 26, 2015 Share Posted March 26, 2015 Hi Paul & Rick, Didn't get through much of this one yet but keep up the excellent work!! Top notch & much appreciated!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Lathe26 Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Well, since we've been talking about meeting in Portland, I finally started a new thread. http://atariage.com/forums/topic/237963-meetup-at-portland-retro-gaming-expo-on-oct-17th-18th/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+cmart604 Posted June 12, 2015 Share Posted June 12, 2015 EP19....where art thou? ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 EP19....where art thou? ? What about 18 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+cmart604 Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 What about 18 18 came out a while ago. catch up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 (edited) Then you should of asked where ep 19 was, in the ep 18 thread....not ep 17. Edited June 13, 2015 by revolutionika Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+cmart604 Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Then you should of asked where ep 19 was, in the ep 18 thread....not ep 17. Meh. I saw the EP17 thread first. ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Lathe26 Posted June 13, 2015 Share Posted June 13, 2015 Number 19 https://youtu.be/b8JlTIo--CQ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+nurmix Posted June 14, 2015 Author Share Posted June 14, 2015 Episode 19 is being worked on. There will be 3 interviews, a new Questions For Keith, and some other surprises. Needless to say, it's taking a while to get through all the editing. My goal is to have it out by this time next week. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+cmart604 Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Excellent news Paul! Looking forward to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mthompson Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Yes, great news. I'm glad that you take the time that's necessary to get the episodes done the way you like them and the way the listeners have come to enjoy them. As with so many things, quality takes time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soporj Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 This podcast is edited? Hard to tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JasonlikesINTV Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 This podcast is edited? Hard to tell. This seems like an non-constructive troll comment. You've made it clear in multiple threads that you don't care for Paul or the Intellivisionaries podcast. I'm sure constructive criticism is welcome, however there's no need to publicly insult their work. I'd like to think the Intellivision community it's better than that. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doctorclu Posted June 14, 2015 Share Posted June 14, 2015 Oh yeh it's edited. All the sound effects do not add themselves in on their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DZ-Jay Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 This seems like an non-constructive troll comment. You've made it clear in multiple threads that you don't care for Paul or the Intellivisionaries podcast. I'm sure constructive criticism is welcome, however there's no need to publicly insult their work. I'd like to think the Intellivision community it's better than that. It's constructive. Many times people have commented nicely on the length of the podcast and they've been responded with a snark. So, there you have it. I guess the Intellivision community is not above that. I'm of the same mind as soporj, and it's not an insult, more of an observation: out-takes; breathing; long interludes of repetitive music or sound effects; 5, 6, even 7 hours in length! Editing does not seem to be much of a key component of production. -dZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulBlazer Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 It's constructive. Many times people have commented nicely on the length of the podcast and they've been responded with a snark. So, there you have it. I guess the Intellivision community is not above that. I'm of the same mind as soporj, and it's not an insult, more of an observation: out-takes; breathing; long interludes of repetitive music or sound effects; 5, 6, even 7 hours in length! Editing does not seem to be much of a key component of production. -dZ. I disagree. I love the length of the podcast, the top quality that the guys do on it, the out takes, the music and sound effects, and the good editing that Nurmix does. As someone who does my own podcast, editing is a bitch. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 Okay okay i'm considering recording something. It may take me a dozen takes. And i think it may end up being longer than 5 minutes. please dont make masturbation video, cause thats what it sounds like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntellivisionDude Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 please dont make masturbation video, cause thats what it sounds like. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JasonlikesINTV Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 It's constructive. Many times people have commented nicely on the length of the podcast and they've been responded with a snark. So, there you have it. I guess the Intellivision community is not above that. I'm of the same mind as soporj, and it's not an insult, more of an observation: out-takes; breathing; long interludes of repetitive music or sound effects; 5, 6, even 7 hours in length! Editing does not seem to be much of a key component of production. -dZ. I'm not saying that the podcast is above criticism, I just felt that a short sarcastic remark was not a constructive way to do it...especially considering that it's a sentiment that's already been expressed and addressed. Offering specific criticism regarding the length, repetition, and outtakes may fall on more receptive ears (or not). Either way, I apologize to both of you if I was out of line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 (edited) Edited June 15, 2015 by revolutionika 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+JasonlikesINTV Posted June 15, 2015 Share Posted June 15, 2015 https://vimeo.com/107422829 What's happening? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.