Jump to content
IGNORED

Play Time Percentage?


Recommended Posts

As a big Retro game fan (had INTV as a kid)...I have a nice collection of old systems. What percentage is your playing time for each system these days?

 

Intellivision - 55% (have LTO Flash)

Atari 7800/2600 - 30% (have Super 78 controller + Harmony Cart)

Atari 5200 - 5% (have AtariMax Cart) - the 5200 controller sucks!!!!

ColecoVision - 5%

Other (NES, Sega Genesis) - 5%

 

Just need to add the AtairiMax for ColecoVision + Super Game module. What are the good all-in-one carts for NES and Sega? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How anyone can play 2600 over Intv is beyond me.

I'm with you. Are there some 2600 games that I'm not aware of that are worth more than a fleeting revisit?

I have a slew of 2-player 2600 on my cabinet that are good for 2 player simultaneous play (Freeway, Combat, Frogs n Flies, Bowling) that are good for a quickie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Activision Boxing was the only 2600 game I liked back in the 1980s. Warlords is a great pong game. And Atari 2600 Phoenix is very well done and prefer it over Intellivision Demon Attack. But the 2600 does not have games with depth like Intellivision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2600 has Pitfall II Lost Caverns and it goes very deep underground....

 

...but actually we go even deeper in Treasure of Tarmin

Well, compare Intellivision Biplanes and Atari Combat Biplanes. With Intellivision the planes can stall and crash. Intellivision Bowling had ball spin, lane slickness, and ball weights. Golf had trajectories so you could hit over trees, [hook and slice]. In Auto Racing you could lose traction and spin out of control. [in Space Battle you had to manage your fleets and avoid computer battles. Sea Battle had strategy and the different ship characteristics.] This is what I mean by depth. Atari programmers were directed to make games that were simple to learn. Alot of Intellivision games couldn't be played without reading the instructions first. Edited by mr_me
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, compare Intellivision Biplanes and Atari Combat Biplanes. With Intellivision the planes can stall and crash. Intellivision Bowling had ball spin, lane slickness, and ball weights. Golf had trajectories so you could hit over trees, [hook and slice]. In Auto Racing you could lose traction and spin out of control. [in Space Battle you had to manage your fleets and avoid computer battles. Sea Battle had strategy and the different ship characteristics.] This is what I mean by depth. Atari programmers were directed to make games that were simple to learn. Alot of Intellivision games couldn't be played without reading the instructions first.

intellivotion = Intellivision + devotion

no need to try to convince me. I was just making a joke with the meaning of the word "depth" and I absolutely agree with you :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you. Are there some 2600 games that I'm not aware of that are worth more than a fleeting revisit?

In my opinion, most definitely. Granted, nostalgia plays a role here, as I had the VCS before moving up to the Intellivision in 1981, but... just a few 'first party' titles off the top of my head...

 

Missile Command

Asteroids

Superman

Adventure

Warlords

Circus Atari

Indy 500

Sky Diver

 

Sure, they aren't as deep as most Intellivision games, but they have great gameplay and are just as entertaining.

 

Of course there are plenty more - especially third party titles - that are well worth a play.

 

 

 

 

Sent from my Keyboard Component using Jack's Conversational Intelli-talk cassette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have very limited Atari 2600 experience, but I really like Megamania, Laser Blast, and Beamrider (the three I play the most) so far. It's more timing and patterns, but it's tight and the gameplay is well paced. I still have plenty more Intellivision to experience, but it's nice to play on other systems for a bit. I have a ton of Nintendo that needs some love :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intellivision 25% ( this would be a lot higher if I could play 2 player games consistently )

2600 5% ( Paddle games and Activision games mostly )

TI99/4A 40% ( this is not so much game play as tinkering making games. However, Star Runner and Parsec are worth playing )

NDS 10% ( If the games loaded faster, I'd play more! But Brain Age, Sudoku and Boggle do get some love )

MAME 10% ( Galaga, QBert, Ping Pong, Gravitar, etc. )

C64 5% ( Accolade games etc. Way to many games to list )

ColecoV 5% ( Lady Bug, Venture, Carnival etc. )

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...