We talked about this a few years ago. Maybe in hindsight he thought different but I kinda agree that WMCJ has a bit more depth.
People's thoughts are going to differ over time and Adisak wasn't going to be any different.
I found his brief comments about reviews quite interesting.
HVS themselves gave certain UK magazines an opportunity to go over the top on critiscm.
Whilst i am not personally a fan of Ruiner Pinball, it's not deserving of the 23% score Ultimate Future Games awarded it.On a similar note, they awarded WMCJ 35% and ST Format should never of used The Rev Stuart Campbell as a reviewer either as the 22% score he awarded it was rather absurd (but he's also the reviewer that gave Defender 2000 it's 3/10 Edge score and similar score in ST Format).
Adisak also spoke of issues with the game which were beyond his control-do you happen to know which in particular he refers to?.
He's been kind enough to talk about the frame rate issues, explain what resolution it runs in, but awful use of colours, blocky background's, quiet music , limited speech sample's...etc.
A lot of questions remain unanswered .
Do you know if they watched the film and/or were Basketball fans themselves?
Back on subject of how they responded to poor reviews:https://www.gamesind...ttacks-reviewer
Edited by Lost Dragon, Wed Dec 5, 2018 9:24 AM.