But if you needed to be there when it all went down in order to write a book, not many historybooks would be written. What you're saying, if I understand correctly, is that in order to write a book on a subject in history you need to have been there or the book can not be considered trustworthy, interviewing the people who were there is not enough because that's only hearsay. Like I said, with that outlook on things not many historybooks would be written.