Jump to content
IGNORED

Atari Files For Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection


Recommended Posts

I thought you managed to smooth the waters and the plan was for you to become something along the lines of a community ambassador or liason?

 

More a stalemate. We made some "verbal" agreements about what I could and couldn't do. I consider atari2600.org mine, and legitimate. They didn't, and insisted on certain content. A for-example; I could not mention Boulder Dash on the site. In the end, we agreed to disagree... but I didn't want to deal with lawyers so I made things as inoffensive as possible. As to liason/ambassador; I offered but they never followed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More a stalemate. We made some "verbal" agreements about what I could and couldn't do. I consider atari2600.org mine, and legitimate. They didn't, and insisted on certain content. A for-example; I could not mention Boulder Dash on the site. In the end, we agreed to disagree... but I didn't want to deal with lawyers so I made things as inoffensive as possible. As to liason/ambassador; I offered but they never followed up.

 

Perhaps when the dust setlles and Atari US ends up re-organized or in new hands you'll be able to re-open the website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just about everyone here knows that Atari exists only as a name, and as a collection of legacy intellectual property. The magic in the company is gone.

 

An "Atari" game is just as much part of Atari as a "Memorex" iPod docking station is a part of the Memorex of years gone by. Which is to say, it the only relation it has is in the name. Nothing more.

 

At least if we're lucky, Atari will have the stain of Master of Orion 3 removed from its name. Wow, that was such an un-Atari screw-up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too had problems with the atari/infrograms company, they went after me for the use of atari logo and my clubs name (Atari Video Club) thats why we had to change our logo to AVCOnline on our shirts we sold at cafepress(we had an atari logo it before)

the fact is way before atari went infrograms we had a connection with the original Atari even before hasbro brought them.

Atari was even interested in fan base with the newsletters.

hopefully who ever gets atari now will do it justice and bring back to the fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are the actual court filings in PDF format. Enjoy!

http://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/121538654?extension=pdf&from=embed&source=embed

 

BTW, if you're not familiar with the documents I released this month, you may want to check out AtariLeaks, which may provide some additional insight into the previous death of Atari Corporation. http://www.atarileaks.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's not. This is the real deal. Curt and I found out yesterday about it through our contacts and have the full inside scoop. Can't say much about it all, other than someone who Curt and I would consider "good hands" is very intersted in it, and we're hoping he gets it (there's going to be bidding by a lot of people). And no, it's not Jim or Nolan. Keep in mind, the craptastic remakes and mobile titles over the past few years were all under Jim and Nolan's direction. Jim as CEO of Atari SA and President of Atari Inc. and Nolan as an advisor to the Atari SA board whose job has been to review and sign off on these games, such as the horrible Star Raiders reboot all the way on up to the current "offerings" of this past year.

 

What I find truly amazing is that the problems happened during a year that should have been one of the most profitable. They just wrapped up celebrating the 40th of the brand, how can you fuck up making money during that?

 

All I can say, is that I hope you and Curt have a connection with whoever wins the bid (or the 'good hands' as you put it). I can't think of anyone else who deserve the IP, or at least have access to the IP, more that you two. (Except maybe Al) :D

 

Bob

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the chants that "Atari will rise again!" remind me of people who say the South will rise again. It won't. Atari's nothing what it was before. We've seen them milk the nostalgic feel(and a few games to boot) numerous times. Atari seemed to do better selling posters/cups/t-shirts/bondage gear with the Atari logo on it, than actually do video games.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the chants that "Atari will rise again!" remind me of people who say the South will rise again. It won't. Atari's nothing what it was before. We've seen them milk the nostalgic feel(and a few games to boot) numerous times. Atari seemed to do better selling posters/cups/t-shirts/bondage gear with the Atari logo on it, than actually do video games.

 

Well, some rich nerd or a group of rich nerds can't really buy the South, but they could buy the Atari name and keep it out of the hands of greedy companies that just want to suck any juice they can out of the Atari name like a bunch of starving vampires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope everyone is treating this as good news. Atari is separating from the former Infogrames, and will emerge out of this as an American company. Bushnell is on the board of directors of Atari SA, and it is a pretty good bet he will move to the new Atari.

 

LOL, apparently you haven't read much of this thread or the previous available threads. Atari SA and Atar Inc. are one in the same; same CEO and President, and both based in the U.S. (with Atari SA out in Los Angeles). Jim moved operations to Los Angeles back in 2009 or so when he became CEO of Atari SA and they bought Cryptic, wanting Cryptic to run most of Atari SA's operations. At that point, anyone left at Atari Inc. was transfered to Los Angeles save for a few people, which is what Inc. still is today (a few people in a rented office space). Secondly, Nolan isn't on the board he's simply an advisor to it - and also shares the responsiblity for the mess Atari SA is in now.

 

It's more of a safe bet that whoever buys the Atari brand name and IP when it's liquidated will want a clean break and will not be having him signing off on games as he has been for the past few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expected this to happen about 7 months ago. They did not listen to people with cash in hand ready to purchase software - all they had to do was ask via the forums or even the FaceBook page. Actually, if they would have just scanned the comments in the FaceBook page for the past year, they would have noticed the repeated and never-ending requests. I didn't see anything ever being done. Business 101 - give the customers what they want and what they will buy - i.e. make them happy and you will make money in the process.

 

I am rooting for the SYZYGY Company right now. That and AtariAge are where the spirit of the real Atari lives.

Edited by smagnotta
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attached to this email is another PDF with the press release from Atari, SA (Paris, France) on December 27, 2012.

 

Unrelated, if there is any existing company that could actually leverage the Atari name and make it work, my vote would be on Valve. They're just now getting into the hardware business, too. And they totally understand their userbase.

ATA-PR-20121227-UK-DEF.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to see why the bankruptcy is happening. Look at Atari's official Facebook page, and then look at the posts before the bad news came. It's people asking for another Roller Coaster Tycoon, and others having numerous problems with products like Baldur's Gate, etc. I've seen less bitching on The Pinball Arcade's Facebook(still getting flak from 360 users).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who actually owns the I.P to the classic Atari arcades, ie: Gauntlet, Marble Madness, A.P.B etc. There's a a gold mine in those IMHO.

 

Midway. And the three games you mentioned are on the recently released compilation disc "Midway Arcade Origins".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unrelated, if there is any existing company that could actually leverage the Atari name and make it work, my vote would be on Valve. They're just now getting into the hardware business, too. And they totally understand their userbase.

 

I really doubt Valve would do any better with the Atari brand name or its IP. When you keep putting development into the hands of kids who barely understand the IP because the didn't grow up with it, you have the type of game that have been released over the last several years. All done by outside studios similar to Valve.

 

 

Midway. And the three games you mentioned are on the recently released compilation disc "Midway Arcade Origins".

 

No. Time Warner Interactive Entertainment. Midway Games is no more.

 

And Spurge, those were all later games by the company Atari Games. The earlier arcade game IP (released under Atari Inc.) is joint owned by the current Atari and TWIE (Atari SA/Atari Interactive owns the copyrights and IP, TWIE owns the arcade appearance).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really doubt Valve would do any better with the Atari brand name or its IP. When you keep putting development into the hands of kids who barely understand the IP because the didn't grow up with it, you have the type of game that have been released over the last several years. All done by outside studios similar to Valve.

That's one way the look at it. The angle I was approaching was something more similar to an Atari Corporation with a focus on gaming consoles. They'd sell their own in-house titles as well as third parties. (And Valve has third party sales down pat with Steam.) They'd have their own hardware (the Piston) and they look like they're getting into cool things like VR displays and biometric input for difficulty/pacing. Everyone knows they're going to enter the videogame console war.

 

Valve is estimated to be worth $3 billion. They're very responsive, they understand their userbase, and they're adored by many. They've got one hell of a software distribution system. Valve has got to be the best bet that the Atari name could ever possibly see in the foreseeable future. Churning out game titles? Valve makes good games, but they're don't crank out the titles. Doesn't matter. Their software distribution system has that issue taken care of, and they're more than happy to grab a slice of third party sales.

 

Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes here in the forum. It just seems like a natural fit to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...