AtariGeezer Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, mozzwald said: You have this working on the ESP32 yet or just the 8266? Care to share yet? Yes on the ESP32, when I have tested all functions, you bet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariGeezer Posted December 26, 2019 Share Posted December 26, 2019 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 26, 2019 Author Share Posted December 26, 2019 For any ESP/Arduino hackers who want to help: Simple task: We want to use OTA for firmware updates (of course), it would be helpful to take a look at tests/esp32/multilator and to adapt it for OTA use. Not So Simple task: ( @ivop ? ) Try to see if we can do an OTA firmware upgrade from an Arduino firmware, to any Arduino Firmware written in ESP32-IDF (or ESP8266-RTOS, which is the same thing) -Thom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 26, 2019 Author Share Posted December 26, 2019 (edited) Also, can somebody write a better Diskulator? The current Diskulator is here: https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/atariwifi/tree/master/esp32/tests/multilator/atari The list of active commands is here: https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/atariwifi/wiki/SIO-Commands-for-Device-ID-%2470 You can see the overall flow of how to send commands to FujiNet, to do things like: * Configure the desired WiFi network * Get a phone book of TNFS hosts * Write an entry into TNFS hosts * Mount a TNFS Server * Read TNFS directory * Read device slots and what's assigned to them * Mount an ATR image from TNFS into a device slot and even things like * how to use player/missile graphics to make a long text-sized colored bar for selection All of these things follow the same basic pattern: * Get the needed parameters * Fill those out in the DCB * call SIOV. the multilator is also a case study in how to make a boot disk from a CC65 binary (the very hacky way of removing the standard binary file headers and segments, and adding a boot loader header at the beginning of crt0.s) It is, at the end of the day, an example. I used CC65 because I am comfortable with it. If you want to do one in assembler, go ahead. please do. More examples for everyone. If you wanna do it in ACTION! ? sure. again, same premise? BASIC? Yes, it will work there too. I'm asking because I need to continue mapping out features and functionality, and I want to get more people involved in writing something better than I can. Edited December 26, 2019 by tschak909 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 27, 2019 Author Share Posted December 27, 2019 #FujiNet with High Speed SIO! Shown here is my Atari 1200XL with a Fujinet (ESP32 version) attached and booting into a MicroSpartaDOS menu full of games, and doing so at US Doubler speed (POKEY Divisor $0A which is 52640 baud) still a lot to do, but it works! Hope everybody is having a great holiday! 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle22 Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 Nice! How about high speed R: and N: Handler? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 28, 2019 Author Share Posted December 28, 2019 sigh. too early. Trust me, given the frequency and the reasons for which I post updates, when that exists, it will happen. For R: and N: this is compounded by the fact that these R: and N: drivers will need a custom SIOV, which I do not know how to write yet, so until I can, or until someone else takes up that mantle... Which again, This is an open project, if you want a feature, please, dive in and help. The scope of what I am needing to do is massive! -Thom 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flashjazzcat Posted December 28, 2019 Share Posted December 28, 2019 Don't forget that you can apply Hias' high speed SIO to all device IO if you have U1MB. If the server implements the Ultraspeed protocol, it should work. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 29, 2019 Author Share Posted December 29, 2019 Just spent the last day and a half implementing and trying to debug ATX based on code in the SDrive-Max... Output is from Wayout.atx ... This...is gonna take some time. urgh. -Thom #FujiNet ATX CMD DEVC: 31 CMD CMND: 53 CMD AUX1: 0 CMD AUX2: 0 CMD CKSM: 84, ACK CMD DEVC: 31 CMD CMND: 52 CMD AUX1: 1 CMD AUX2: 0 CMD CKSM: 84, ACK atx_read(); Status now 10 Bytes per sector now: 128 Drive Request delay. 3.22ms atxCurrentHeadTrack != tgtTrackNumber. (0, 1) Track stepping done. read track header @:48 Read Track header. Track has 18 sectors. Track header is 32 bytes. Retries left 4 Sector #0 - seeking to 88 Read sector header, status 0, timev 273 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 96Sector #1 - seeking to 96 Read sector header, status 0, timev 1639 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 104Sector #2 - seeking to 104 Read sector header, status 0, timev 3009 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 112Sector #3 - seeking to 112 Read sector header, status 0, timev 4375 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 120Sector #4 - seeking to 120 Read sector header, status 0, timev 5746 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 128Sector #5 - seeking to 128 Read sector header, status 0, timev 7118 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 136Sector #6 - seeking to 136 Read sector header, status 0, timev 8486 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 144Sector #7 - seeking to 144 Read sector header, status 0, timev 9859 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 152Sector #8 - seeking to 152 Read sector header, status 0, timev 11226 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 160Sector #9 - seeking to 160 Read sector header, status 0, timev 12592 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 168Sector #10 - seeking to 168 Read sector header, status 0, timev 13960 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 176Sector #11 - seeking to 176 Read sector header, status 0, timev 15326 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 184Sector #12 - seeking to 184 Read sector header, status 0, timev 16697 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 192Sector #13 - seeking to 192 Read sector header, status 0, timev 18063 tt: 15415 atxLastAngle now: 18063tgtSectorIndex: 13, tgtSectorOffset: 1856Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 200Sector #14 - seeking to 200 Read sector header, status 0, timev 19428 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 208Sector #15 - seeking to 208 Read sector header, status 0, timev 20796 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 216Sector #16 - seeking to 216 Read sector header, status 0, timev 22160 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 224Sector #17 - seeking to 224 Read sector header, status 0, timev 23529 Proceeding forward, currentFileOffset now: 232We're good, no need to retry. Sector data follows: 00 01 00 06 00 10 a9 52 8d 02 03 a9 01 8d 01 03 a9 00 8d 0b 03 a9 13 8d 0a 03 a9 00 8d 04 03 a9 80 8d 05 03 20 53 e4 10 39 a9 00 8d 0b 03 a9 25 8d 0a 03 a9 00 8d 04 03 a9 10 8d 05 03 20 53 e4 30 20 ad 0a 03 c9 a4 f0 17 ee 0a 03 ad 04 03 18 69 80 8d 04 03 ad 05 03 69 00 8d 05 03 4c 3d 06 18 60 a0 65 a9 00 99 00 06 88 10 fa 38 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Rotational delay is now 15415 Waiting for next angular position 19271 Status returned as: ff, num bytes: 128 reqSec: 1, sector_size 128, statusByte: ff 00 01 00 06 00 10 a9 52 8d 02 03 a9 01 8d 01 03 a9 00 8d 0b 03 a9 13 8d 0a 03 a9 00 8d 04 03 a9 80 8d 05 03 20 53 e4 10 39 a9 00 8d 0b 03 a9 25 8d 0a 03 a9 00 8d 04 03 a9 10 8d 05 03 20 53 e4 30 20 ad 0a 03 c9 a4 f0 17 ee 0a 03 ad 04 03 18 69 80 8d 04 03 ad 05 03 69 00 8d 05 03 4c 3d 06 18 60 a0 65 a9 00 99 00 06 88 10 fa 38 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CMD DEVC: 31 CMD CMND: 52 CMD AUX1: 13 CMD AUX2: 0 CMD CKSM: 96, ACK atx_read(); Status now 10 Bytes per sector now: 128 Drive Request delay. 3.22ms Status returned as: ef, num bytes: 0 reqSec: 19, sector_size 128, statusByte: ef CMD DEVC: 31 CMD CMND: 52 CMD AUX1: 1 CMD AUX2: 0 CMD CKSM: 84, ACK atx_read(); Status now 10 Bytes per sector now: 128 Drive Request delay. 3.22ms Status returned as: ef, num bytes: 0 reqSec: 1, sector_size 128, statusByte: ef CMD DEVC: 31 CMD CMND: 52 CMD AUX1: 13 CMD AUX2: 0 CMD CKSM: 96, ACK atx_read(); Status now 10 Bytes per sector now: 128 Drive Request delay. 3.22ms Status returned as: ef, num bytes: 0 reqSec: 19, sector_size 128, statusByte: ef CMD DEVC: 31 CMD CMND: 52 CMD AUX1: 1 CMD AUX2: 0 CMD CKSM: 84, ACK atx_read(); Status now 10 Bytes per sector now: 128 Drive Request delay. 3.22ms Status returned as: ef, num bytes: 0 reqSec: 1, sector_size 128, statusByte: ef Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 29, 2019 Author Share Posted December 29, 2019 Okay, I have checked in the ATX test program in esp32/atx/tests if anyone wants to hack on it. It almost works. urgh. https://github.com/FujiNetWIFI/atariwifi/tree/master/esp32/tests/atxtest -Thom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 31, 2019 Author Share Posted December 31, 2019 Hey guys, it's the end of the year. Hope everyone's had a good one! I've recorded this #FujiNet video to show the reliability performance improvements that have been made in Multilator over the last week, which are fantastic even over links to cloud hosts! In this video, we copy a disk image TO a real Atari 1050 disk, AS WELL as to another disk image, on ANOTHER cloud host, and boot them! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a8isa1 Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 Which test do I need to install to examine high speed SIO? Do I need to enable something in the sketch? -SteveS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted December 31, 2019 Author Share Posted December 31, 2019 (edited) in tests/multilator, go to sio_high_speed: set the pokey divisor, then add a call to update the baud rate at the bottom of the sketch, e.g. SIO_UART.updateBaudRate(52640); // for pokey divisor A. Keep in mind, I am not flipping back and forth in the current code, this will cause problems. You'll also want to use the latest 8266 board support (2.6.3), as updateBaudRate is a new function. -Thom Edited December 31, 2019 by tschak909 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariGeezer Posted December 31, 2019 Share Posted December 31, 2019 On 12/27/2019 at 7:41 PM, Kyle22 said: Nice! How about high speed R: and N: Handler? Last night I was able to use the Express cart to call your BBS using the fujunet board, but at 19200 baud it looses data, not sure if a ring / circular buffer would help or not. One solution might be an accellerated E: handler? Also, can you update my account on your BBS? Guess I haven't called enough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle22 Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Express cart must have slow code that can't handle the speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle22 Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 If we are successfully doing Data I/O @ 125KBaud, then there is NO reason we should drop characters @ 19.2. The hardware is faster than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariGeezer Posted January 1, 2020 Share Posted January 1, 2020 Guys, Here's a bit of code to wet your appetite This will help you in getting rid of that state machine... void Handle_SIO() { byte nDev = 0; byte nCmd = 0; byte Aux1 = 0; byte Aux2 = 0; byte ChkSum = 0; int nRtn = 0; if (SerSIO.available() > 0) { nRtn = SerSIO.readBytes(&SIO_CmdFrame, 5); if (nRtn == 5) { long time = micros(); // Wait For COMMAND to go HIGH while ((digitalRead(CMD_PIN) == LOW) && ((micros() - time) < 600)) { yield(); } SIO_CmdLineLow = false; //InvertBuffer(&SIO_CmdFrame, 4) ChkSum = Calc_SIO_Checksum(SIO_CmdFrame, 4); if (ChkSum != SIO_CmdFrame[4]) { return; } nDev = SIO_CmdFrame[0]; nCmd = SIO_CmdFrame[1]; Aux1 = SIO_CmdFrame[2]; Aux2 = SIO_CmdFrame[3]; SerBUG.print("SIO_CmdFrame -> "); SerBUG.print(nDev, HEX); SerBUG.print(","); SerBUG.print(nCmd, HEX); SerBUG.print(","); SerBUG.print(Aux1, HEX); SerBUG.print(","); SerBUG.print(Aux2, HEX); SerBUG.print(","); SerBUG.print(R_Dev.BootFlg, HEX); SerBUG.print(","); SerBUG.println(R_Dev.PollCnt, HEX); if (nCmd == '?') { // POLL COMMAND? Process_RDev_GetBootParms(Aux1, Aux2); // (Type 1/2 Poll command) } else { R_Dev.PollCnt = 26; if ((R_Dev.BootFlg != 0xFF) && (nDev == 0x31)) { //SerBUG.println("DDev"); switch (nCmd) { case 'S': // $53 Get PSEUDO DISK STATUS Process_DDev_Status(Aux1, Aux2); break; case 'R': // $52 Get Byte(s) Process_DDev_Read(Aux1, Aux2); break; default: R_Dev.BootFlg = 0; // Set Boot Flag Minus Send_SIO_Response(NAK); // Issue a (N)ak Response break; } return; } } switch (nDev) { case 0x50: // R1: case 0x51: // R2: case 0x52: // R3: case 0x53: // R4: Process_R_Dev(nDev, nCmd, Aux1, Aux2); break; case 0x58: // W1: WiFi Modem Process_W_Dev(nDev, nCmd, Aux1, Aux2); break; case 0x70: // N1: Network Device (TNFS) Process_N_Dev(nDev, nCmd, Aux1, Aux2); break; default: break; } } else { // Error Occured if (nRtn < 1) { // Serial Error } else { // Less Than 5 Bytes Received } } } else { if (R_Dev.Concurrent) { // Drop Out of Concurrent Mode R_Dev.Concurrent = false; } } } 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariGeezer Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 (edited) Here are 2 binaries for the ESP32 board if anyone would like to test the 850 Emulation or TNFS routines (I'll have to make a small doc to use the TNFS routines)... AtaWiModem.ino.esp32.bin AtaWiModem.ino.esp32thing.bin Edited January 2, 2020 by AtariGeezer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted January 2, 2020 Author Share Posted January 2, 2020 Hi! Happy New Year! (I say this, after saying thank you for the main loop that you posted), why no source? -Thom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtariGeezer Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 (edited) On 12/25/2019 at 11:59 AM, tschak909 said: Part of the work I am planning to do outside of the "D:" emulation, focuses on the following aspects: * Creating a new N: device for TCP and UDP communication * Creating an R: device that actually implements a proper device, instead of just dumping into R-Verter mode. -Thom I'll post my source code after you do this Edited January 2, 2020 by AtariGeezer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted January 2, 2020 Author Share Posted January 2, 2020 (edited) @AtariGeezer Ok, I'm going to call you out, right now. You're a douche. Seriously, fuck you for promising to share source code, in return for a device. -Thom Edited January 2, 2020 by tschak909 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle22 Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 I love Programming and such, but involved We won this before it was over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted January 2, 2020 Author Share Posted January 2, 2020 ??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyle22 Posted January 2, 2020 Share Posted January 2, 2020 11 minutes ago, tschak909 said: Ok, I'm going to call you out, right now. You're a douche. -Thom Why would you ATTACK me for telling the truth? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tschak909 Posted January 2, 2020 Author Share Posted January 2, 2020 @Kyle22 are you saying that you and @AtariGeezer are the same person? -Thom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
AtariAge on Instagram
Watch us on YouTube
Chat on Discord
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.